Grand Jury Rejects New Indictment Towards Letitia James

Date:

NORFOLK, Va. (AP) — The Justice Division failed Thursday to safe a brand new indictment in opposition to New York Lawyer Basic Letitia James after a choose dismissed the earlier mortgage fraud prosecution inspired by President Donald Trump, in response to individuals conversant in the matter.

Prosecutors went again to a grand jury in Virginia after a choose’s ruling halting the prosecution of James and one other longtime Trump foe, former FBI Director James Comey, on the grounds that the U.S. lawyer who offered the circumstances was illegally appointed. However grand jurors rejected prosecutors’ request to deliver prices.

It’s the most recent setback for the Justice Division in its bid to prosecute the frequent political goal of the Republican president.

Prosecutors are anticipated to attempt once more for an indictment, in response to one individual conversant in the matter who spoke on the situation of anonymity as a result of they weren’t approved to publicly focus on the case.

James was initially charged with financial institution fraud and making false statements to a monetary establishment in reference to a house buy in Norfolk, Virginia, in 2020. Lindsey Halligan, a former White Home aide and Trump lawyer, personally offered the case to the grand jury in October after being put in as U.S. lawyer for the Japanese District of Virginia amid strain from Trump to cost Comey and James.

James has denied any wrongdoing and accused the administration of utilizing the justice system to hunt revenge in opposition to Trump’s political opponents. In a press release Thursday, James stated: “It is time for this unchecked weaponization of our justice system to stop.”

New York Lawyer Basic, Letitia James, speaks after pleading not responsible exterior the USA District Courtroom on Friday, Oct. 24, 2025, in Norfolk, Va.

“This should be the end of this case,” her lawyer, Abbe Lowell, stated in a press release. “If they continue, undeterred by a court ruling and a grand jury’s rejection of the charges, it will be a shocking assault on the rule of law and a devastating blow to the integrity of our justice system.”

The allegations associated to James’ buy of a modest home in Norfolk, the place she has household. Through the sale, she signed a normal doc known as a “second home rider” during which she agreed to maintain the property primarily for her “personal use and enjoyment for at least one year,” except the lender agreed in any other case.

Moderately than utilizing the house as a second residence, James rented it out to a household of three, permitting her to acquire favorable mortgage phrases not out there for funding properties, prosecutors alleged.

It’s the most recent instance of pushback by grand jurors because the starting of the second Trump administration. It’s so uncommon for grand jurors to refuse to return an indictment that it was as soon as stated that prosecutors might persuade a grand jury to “indict a ham sandwich.” However the Justice Division has confronted setbacks in entrance of grand juries in a number of current circumstances.

Even when the costs in opposition to James are resurrected, the Justice Division might face obstacles in securing a conviction in opposition to James.

James’ legal professionals individually argued the case was a vindictive prosecution delivered to punish the Trump critic who spent years investigating and suing the Republican president and received a staggering judgment in a lawsuit alleging he defrauded banks by overstating the worth of his actual property holdings on monetary statements. The superb was later tossed out by the next courtroom, however either side are interesting.

The protection had additionally alleged “outrageous government conduct” previous her indictment, which the protection argued warrants the case’s dismissal. The choose hadn’t dominated on the protection’s arguments on these issues earlier than dismissing the case final month over the appointment of Lindsey Halligan as U.S. lawyer.

U.S. District Choose Cameron McGowan Currie took concern with the mechanism the Trump administration employed to nominate Halligan to steer one of many Justice Division’s most elite and necessary workplaces.

Halligan was named as a substitute for Erik Siebert, a veteran prosecutor within the workplace and interim U.S. lawyer who resigned in September amid Trump administration strain to file prices in opposition to each Comey and James.

The next evening, Trump stated he can be nominating Halligan to the function of interim U.S. lawyer and publicly implored Lawyer Basic Pam Bondi to take motion in opposition to his political opponents, saying in a Reality Social submit that, “We can’t delay any longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility” and “JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!”

Comey was indicted three days after Halligan was sworn in by Bondi, and James was charged two weeks after that.

The Justice Division had defended Halligan’s appointment however has additionally revealed that Bondi had given Halligan a separate place of “Special Attorney,” presumably as a option to defend the indictments from the potential for collapse. However Currie stated such a retroactive designation couldn’t save the circumstances.

Richer reported from Washington.

Share post:

Subscribe

Latest Article's

More like this
Related

Supreme Court docket Permits Texas To Use Trump-Backed Congressional Maps

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court docket on Thursday...

Ilhan Omar Hits Again At Trump With 2 Pointed Sentences After His Repeated Assaults

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) on Tuesday delivered a biting...

Donald Trump Pardons Democratic Politician: ‘Your Nightmare Is Finally Over’

President Donald Trump mentioned he'll challenge a preemptive pardon...