Barack Obama’s infamous admonishment to enterprise homeowners that “you didn’t build that” was unhealthy sufficient, however a latest assertion by Donald Trump is much more collectivist: he claims he owns the shop.
The Monetary Instances studies on a Time Journal interview of President Trump (“Donald Trump Claims to Have Received Call from Xi Jinping and to Have Cut ‘200 Deals’ on Trade,” Monetary Instances, April 25, 2025):
When requested what Xi had informed him within the dialog that Trump claims occurred, the US president referred to the facility he had as gatekeeper for the US shopper market. “It’s a giant, beautiful store, and everybody wants to go shopping there. And on behalf of the American people, I own the store, and I set prices, and I’ll say, if you want to shop here, this is what you have to pay,” Trump informed Time.
Plainly Mr. Trump was complicated imports and exports, for what his commerce coverage is concentrated on is deciding which suppliers his retailer will purchase from. However let’s ignore this small element.
If the chief ruler of a rustic says he owns the shop, he’s expressing one thing fairly near Marxist principle, of which a significant pillar is the collective (“social”) possession of the technique of manufacturing, which embrace stores. The nation is a collective, and the shop is collective property. The obvious homeowners of personal shops, if there are any, profit from a particular privilege from the collective or are merely state brokers. No person should buy from, or promote to, the collective retailer with out the permission—and tax gouging—of the gatekeeper.
Invoking “the people” is a mere excuse to justify the state’s possession of the technique of manufacturing. Nothing will be owned by all people, for possession means management. Collective possession implies that no particular person “owner” might promote his share; fairly the opposite, he’s caught with it and should make sacrifices for it. In Chapter 13 of Justice and Its Environment, Anthony de Jasay discusses the “social ownership” pretense of Marxist collectivism. Proudly owning and controlling the technique of manufacturing “on behalf of the people” or the working class is simply a propaganda trick. In each collectivism of the left (Marxism and socialism) and collectivism of the suitable (populism and fascism), the shop belongs to those that management the state or act as its brokers. (Word the massive principal-agent downside there.) A populist chief offers a distinct taste to the parable of collective possession by pretending that he embodies the folks.
Useless so as to add, no classical liberal theorist ever argued that the chief official of the federal government of a free nation would “own the store.”
Who would have thought that the populist ruler of America was extra Marxist than at this time’s run-of-the-mill social democrats or socialists? In reality, it’s not stunning as a result of the left and the suitable each maintain collective and political decisions as superior to particular person and personal decisions. Mr. Trump isn’t a Marxist, he’s simply one other type of collectivist.
Another speculation is that, along with his retailer possession declare, Mr. Trump was simply making noises along with his vocal chords, with out greedy the which means of the sounds. An economist is methodologically reluctant to make this prognosis however, in a latest Purpose column, Jacob Sullum suggests one thing alongside these traces.
******************************
The proprietor of the USA Retailer sitting behind his checkout counter
