Welcome to YC Enviornment, which isn’t a prime secret battle membership for Y Combinator founders however relatively a collection of video games that provide you with a obscure sense of what it’s wish to be a accomplice at YC.
Created by a scholar in Berlin, YC Enviornment’s YC Associate Simulator recreation reveals you a publicly out there pitch video from an organization that utilized to YC, together with the 12 months of their software. You click on “accept” or “reject,” after which discover out for those who made the identical selection as YC.
It’s rather a lot more durable than it seems to be. YC is estimated to just accept round 1% of candidates, and at a sure level, some luck is required to essentially seize a accomplice’s eye — possibly your pitch is the primary {that a} accomplice watched after a really rejuvenating espresso break, or possibly your organization is the final video on the checklist and everybody’s drained.
“Many rejected founders went on to build incredibly successful companies afterwards,” reads a notice at first of the sport. “Rejection means nothing — even the most successful founders got rejected multiple times.”
YC Enviornment has different video games that ask you to match an organization title to its emblem, or guess what 12 months an organization did YC based mostly on its description (spoiler alert: There’s much more AI in recent times). However the YC Associate Simulator recreation is probably the most fascinating because it makes us confront our personal decision-making processes.
As a tech journalist, I believed I might be fairly good on the YC Associate Simulator. I is probably not an investor, however I do know what it’s wish to sift via an inbox filled with startup pitches and select which of them pique my curiosity — I’ve walked the ground of TechCrunch Disrupt’s Startup Battlefield 200 Expo with the duty of figuring out corporations to interview and write about. However this recreation is tough. In spite of everything, we’re working inside totally different parameters, because the newsworthiness of an organization will not be immediately tied to its potential to show a revenue.
(For instance: As I write this, there’s an AI pet sitting in my lap that I’m planning to evaluate. Would I put cash on the guess that Casio will flip a revenue off the funding it takes to create a glorified Furby that retails for $430? No. Do I anticipate that an article about my life with an AI pet will probably be fascinating to readers? Sure.)
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
If something, the sport reveals simply how subjective these processes may be. However after I learn YC co-founder Paul Graham’s software information, my guesses began to get extra correct.
“You have to be exceptionally clear and concise,” Graham wrote. “Whatever you have to say, give it to us right in the first sentence, in the simplest possible terms.” (For the report, this recommendation additionally applies to emailing journalists.)
I performed the sport once more, however this time, I paid much less consideration to what the corporate was pitching and extra consideration to how shortly they may convey what their firm does. After all, I wouldn’t advocate this technique for evaluating a startup in actual life (scorching take: it is best to care what an organization does!), however for the needs of the sport, I ended up selecting an organization’s destiny extra precisely.
This in all probability isn’t a coincidence. When OpenAI founder and CEO Sam Altman was president of YC, he remarked in an interview that the incubator spent simply 10 minutes reviewing every firm’s software to decide.
“It turns out that in 10 minutes, if the only question you’re trying to answer is, ‘Does this person have the potential to be the next Mark Zuckerberg?’ … You can answer that question in 10 minutes,” Altman stated in 2016. “Not with 100 percent accuracy, obviously, but good enough that our business model works.”
