Home Blog Page 1896

Texas Republican leads fight to bring home imprisoned former Marine from Russia

marine charged russia 80541.jpg 2021.11.20 2021.%25i.1637442568.6 c0 59 1244

Rep. August Pfluger is leading the effort to bring home a former U.S. Marine Trevor Reed from Russia, where he was sentenced to nine years in prison over assertions that he assaulted a police officer.

Mr. Pfluger, Texas Republican, has been in contact with Mr. Reed’s family since he first came to Congress in 2021.

“My involvement was, first and foremost, because he’s a constituent or his parents are, and secondly, because it’s the right thing to do to speak up for somebody. Thirdly, because he’s a veteran and he’s being used as a political pawn,” Mr. Pfluger told The Washington Times.

Mr. Reed, 30, has been detained and jailed in Russia for over two years over allegations that he endangered the “life and health” of Russian police officers in a drunken altercation.

Mr. Reed and his family, however, denied the charges against him. U.S. officials have also called the evidence against him flimsy.

Mr. Reed recently ended a days-long hunger strike last week in protest of his detainment, as well as alleged human rights abuses by the Russian government.

Mr. Pfluger led a resolution calling for the release of Mr. Reed in June, which passed the House with bipartisan support.

Since then, the lawmaker said he has continued to coordinate with the Biden administration and his colleagues to keep drawing attention to the case. 

Mr. Pfluger praised officials at the State Department for their coordination and highlighted the importance of sending a message that the country backs those unfairly imprisoned by U.S. adversaries.

“There’s very few things that are truly bipartisan,” Mr. Pfluger said. “The resolution expressed that we as Americans care that no American was left behind, and this is an American that is being held against his will.”

President Biden brought up Mr. Reed as well as U.S. Marine and former Michigan police officer Paul Whelan over their detainments in a June meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Mr. Whelan was sentenced to 16 years in prison in 2020 for espionage-related charges.

“I raised the case of two wrongfully imprisoned American citizens, Paul Whelan and Trevor Reed,” Mr. Biden told reporters. “The families of the detained Americans came up and we discussed them. We’re going to follow through with that discussion. I am not going to walk away on that.”

Mr. Pfluger said he was in contact with Mr. Reed’s family about a week ago, and has coordinated visits with them in Washington, D.C. and Texas.

“In the last conversation, I just told them, I was praying for him, and that we were thinking about him,” Mr. Pfluger said. “Our office and some people that had served with him wrote some letters to really encourage him both mentally and spiritually and physically to hang in there.”

Why Crypto.com Is Putting Its Name on the Staples Center

18crypto facebookJumbo

It was then, during a slump in cryptocurrency prices, that Mr. Marszalek decided to rebrand Monaco. He contacted Matt Blaze, a cryptography professor then at the University of Pennsylvania, who had owned the crypto.com domain name for 25 years. During that time, Mr. Blaze had refused to part with the web address and had publicly disdained the new digital gold rush.

But this time, Mr. Blaze couldn’t resist. In a July 2018 blog post, he wrote that he had “gotten a growing barrage of offers, many of which were obviously nonserious, but a few of which were, frankly, attention-getting, for the crypto.com domain.” He said he had “shrugged most of them off, but it became increasingly clear that holding on to the domain was making less and less sense for me.”

Mr. Blaze, now a professor at Georgetown University, declined to comment. In a Zoom interview from a stark white room in Hong Kong, Mr. Marszalek also declined to discuss what he paid for the Crypto.com domain name, but pointed to an article on the tech site The Verge that suggested the address could be worth millions.

In an interview, Mr. Marszalek, 42, a Polish-born entrepreneur, said Crypto.com and its parent company, Foris Technology, had their headquarters in Singapore. Crypto.com’s trading app, which allows people to buy and sell Bitcoin, Ether and 150 other digital currencies, makes money by taking a fee on transactions. Mr. Marszalek said the company was profitable but did not provide exact figures.

“As with all cryptocurrency businesses this year, the market has been phenomenal,” he said. He added that Crypto.com’s revenue between April and June was about a quarter of that of Coinbase, a leading cryptocurrency exchange, which generated $2.2 billion in revenue in that period.

Crypto.com is only the ninth-largest cryptocurrency exchange by daily volume, according to CoinMarketCap, a site that tracks cryptocurrency trading and prices. Yet the bull market has allowed the company to fund an eye-popping marketing push.

U.S. Rests Its Case in the Elizabeth Holmes Trial

00holmes prosecution facebookJumbo

SAN JOSE, Calif. — For the past 11 weeks, prosecutors revealed emails from desperate investors. They held up falsified documents side-by-side with the originals. They called dozens of witnesses who lobbed accusations of deceit and evasiveness.

And on Friday, after questioning their 29th witness, prosecutors concluded their arguments against Elizabeth Holmes, the founder of the failed blood testing start-up Theranos. Ms. Holmes has pleaded not guilty to 11 counts of defrauding investors over Theranos’s technology and business, in a case that has been billed as a referendum on Silicon Valley’s start-up culture.

The prosecution’s resting its case is a major turning point in the trial of Ms. Holmes, whose rise and fall captivated the public and who has been held up as a symbol of the tech industry’s hubris and the last decade’s culture of grift.

For weeks, prosecutors sought to paint Ms. Holmes, 37, as a liar who built Theranos into a $9 billion start-up while knowing all along that the company’s blood tests, which were trumpeted as revolutionary, didn’t work. Prosecutors methodically outlined six main areas of Ms. Holmes’s deception, including lies about Theranos’s work with the military and pharmaceutical companies, its business performance and the accuracy of its blood tests.

Her lawyers are now expected to argue that Theranos was merely a failure and not a fraud, raising the question of whether Ms. Holmes will take the stand in her own defense. In filings, her lawyers have indicated that she is likely to testify.

The stakes of the trial are high. If Ms. Holmes is convicted, she faces up to 20 years in prison for each count of fraud, and prosecutors may be emboldened to go after more start-ups that stretch the truth to raise funding. An acquittal could send a message that Silicon Valley start-ups, which have exploded in power and wealth over the last decade, are difficult to hold to account.

“When prosecutors rest their case, they are basically saying they have enough to ask the jury to convict the defendant right then and there,” said Andrey Spektor, a lawyer at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner and former federal prosecutor in New York’s Eastern District. He said he expected the defense to put on a case, rather than simply allow the jury to decide whether the prosecutors failed to prove theirs.

Ms. Holmes, a Stanford University dropout who founded Theranos in 2003 and raised $945 million from investors, was indicted on fraud charges in 2018. Her case has been plagued for years by delays: First over process, then the pandemic and finally, Ms. Holmes’s giving birth to a baby in August.

When the trial finally began in September, prosecutors called former investors, partners and Theranos employees to testify. Jim Mattis, the retired four-star Marine Corps general and former defense secretary who was a Theranos director, took the stand, as did a former Theranos lab director who endured six grueling days of questioning. In one surreal moment, a forensics expert recited text messages between Ms. Holmes and her then-boyfriend and business partner at Theranos, Ramesh Balwani, who is known as Sunny.

This week, Alan Eisenman, an early investor in Theranos, testified that Ms. Holmes cut him off and threatened him when he asked her for more information about the company. Yet even after that treatment, Mr. Eisenman poured more money into the start-up, believing its seemingly fast-growing business would deliver riches to backers like him.

When asked about his understanding of the value of his Theranos stock today, Mr. Eisenman said, “It’s not an understanding, it’s a conclusion. It’s worth zero.”

The prosecution’s most compelling evidence included a series of validation reports that Ms. Holmes sent to potential investors and partners that made it look as though pharmaceutical companies including Pfizer and Schering-Plough had endorsed Theranos’s technology. Representatives from each company testified that they had not endorsed Theranos’s blood test and were surprised to see their companies’ logos added to the report.

Daniel Edlin, who worked at Theranos and was a fraternity brother of Ms. Holmes’s brother, Christian, testified that the start-up faked demonstrations of its machines for potential investors, hid technology failures and threw out abnormal blood test results.

Mr. Mattis testified that he was not aware of any contracts between Theranos and the military to put its machines on medevac helicopters or on the battlefield, as Ms. Holmes had frequently told investors.

The prosecution concluded its case with testimony from Roger Parloff, the journalist who wrote a magazine cover story about Ms. Holmes, helping propel her to acclaim. Mr. Parloff’s article was sent to numerous investors as part of Ms. Holmes’s pitch.

Yet notably absent from the courtroom were some of the most prominent witnesses on the prosecution’s list. Ms. Holmes’s rise was aided by her association with business titans such as the media mogul Rupert Murdoch, elder statesmen such as Henry Kissinger and Admiral Gary Roughead, and the lawyer David Boies. Theranos was felled, in part, by whistle-blowers such as Tyler Shultz, the grandson of George Shultz, the former secretary of state who sat on Theranos’s board. None of them testified.

Also absent was Mr. Balwani, who was charged with fraud alongside Ms. Holmes and faces trial next year. His role as a fiery defender of Theranos who went after anyone who questioned the company has been in the background of much of the testimony.

At nearly every turn, Ms. Holmes’s lawyers sought to limit testimony and evidence. They attacked the credibility of investors, using legal disclaimers to show that investors knew they were gambling on a young start-up. The lawyers also poked holes in investors’ limited due diligence on Theranos’s claims. At one point, they directed Erika Cheung, a key whistle-blower who worked in Theranos’s lab, to read the entire organizational chart of the people employed in lab to show she played a small role in the overall operation.

The defense successfully argued to have one count of fraud against Ms. Holmes dropped. A patient who received a suspicious test from Theranos was barred from testifying earlier this month.

Ms. Holmes’s lawyers are likely to try to shine a spotlight on her relationship with Mr. Balwani. The two dated in secret. In court filings, Ms. Holmes alleged he was emotionally abusive and controlling. Mr. Balwani’s lawyers have denied the claims.

Testimony from Ms. Holmes is likely to revive the media circus surrounding the trial’s early days, which died down as the weeks of testimony wore on. It would also open her up to potentially damaging cross-examination from prosecutors or perjury.

“Most criminal defendants do not testify, particularly in white-collar cases where the government has many challenges to overcome, like in proving intent, and sometimes even in just proving that a crime occurred,” Mr. Spektor said. Ms. Holmes’s case is different, he said, because the offense is clear cut and the evidence is fairly easy to understand.

Throughout the proceedings, Ms. Holmes has been quiet in the courtroom, only whispering to her lawyers or family members. But the jury heard her forcefully defending Theranos against accusations of fraud in video interviews played in court. They also heard her accept blame.

“I’m the founder and C.E.O. of this company,” she said in one of the videos. “Anything that happens in this company is my responsibility.”

Canada approves COVID-19 vaccine for kids ages 5 to 11

Virus Outbreak Canada 46027.jpg 3302c c0 129 3000

Health officials in Canada have approved the use of PfizerBioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine for children ages 5 to 11. 

“This is the first COVID-19 vaccine authorized in Canada for use in this age group and marks a major milestone in Canada’s fight against COVID-19,” Health Canada said in a statement Friday. 

The health agency said it received an application from Pfizer and BioNTech asking to expand the use of Comirnaty, the official name of the drugmakers’ COVID-19 vaccine, on Oct. 18. The vaccine was authorized for use in people 16 years and older on Dec. 9, 2020 and for children from 12 to 15 years old on May 5. 

Health Canada said it decided the benefits of the vaccine for younger children outweigh the risks. The department has authorized a two-shot regiment of 10 micrograms to be given three weeks apart. The dosage for children 5 to 11 years old is one-third the size of the dosage approved for people 12 years of age and older. 

Data from a clinical trial showed the vaccine was 90.7% effective at preventing COVID-19 in 5- to 11-year-olds with no serious side effects identified, according to Health Canada. 

The agency said it is requiring Pfizer and BioNTech to continually provide data about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine among these younger children. Health Canada added it also will monitor safety data of the vaccine and take necessary action if any safety issues arise. 

Just over 75% of Canada’s population are fully vaccinated against COVID-19 as of Friday, health data shows. Meanwhile, more than 85% of the country’s residents aged 12 and up are fully inoculated. 

Canada’s approval of the vaccine comes about two weeks after U.S. health officials green-lighted Pfizer’s COVID-19 shots for children ages 5 to 11. 

Health, The New York Today

Teamsters Vote for Sean O’Brien, a Hoffa Critic, as President

00teamsters facebookJumbo

Sean O’Brien was a rising star in the International Brotherhood of Teamsters in 2017 when the union’s longtime president, James P. Hoffa, effectively cast him aside.

But that move appears to have set Mr. O’Brien, a fourth-generation Teamster and head of a Boston local, on a course to succeed Mr. Hoffa as the union’s president and one of the most powerful labor leaders in the country.

A Teamsters vice president who urged a more assertive stand toward employers like the United Parcel Service — as well as an aggressive drive to organize workers at Amazon — Mr. O’Brien has declared victory in his bid to lead the nearly 1.4 million-member union.

According to a tally reported late Thursday on an election supervisor’s website, he won about two-thirds of the votes cast in a race against the Hoffa-endorsed candidate, Steve Vairma, another vice president. He will assume the presidency in March.

The result appears to reflect frustration over the most recent UPS contract and growing dissatisfaction with Mr. Hoffa, who has headed the union for more than two decades and whose father did from 1957 to 1971. The younger Mr. Hoffa did not seek another five-year term.

In an interview, Mr. O’Brien said success in organizing Amazon workers — a stated goal of the Teamsters — would require the union to show the fruits of its efforts elsewhere.

“We’ve got to negotiate the strongest contracts possible so that we can take it to workers at Amazon and point to it and say this is the benefit you get of being in a union,” he said.

David Witwer, an expert on the Teamsters at Pennsylvania State University at Harrisburg, said it was very rare for the Teamsters to elect a president who was not an incumbent or backed by the incumbent and who was sharply critical of his predecessor, as Mr. O’Brien was of Mr. Hoffa.

Since the union’s official founding in 1903, Dr. Witwer said in an email, “there have been only two national union elections that have seen an outside reformer candidate win election as president.”

During the campaign, Mr. O’Brien, 49, railed against the contract that the union negotiated with UPS for allowing the company to create a category of employees who work on weekends and top out at a lower wage, among other perceived flaws.

“If we’re negotiating concessionary contracts and we’re negotiating substandard agreements, why would any member, why would any person want to join the Teamsters union?” Mr. O’Brien said at a candidate forum in September in which he frequently tied his opponent to Mr. Hoffa.

Mr. O’Brien has also criticized his predecessor’s approach to Amazon, which many in the labor movement regard as an existential threat. Although the union approved a resolution at its recent convention pledging to “supply all resources necessary” to unionize Amazon workers and eventually create a division overseeing that organizing, Mr. O’Brien said the efforts were too late in coming.

“That plan should have been in place under our warehouse director 10 years ago,” he said in the interview, alluding to the position of warehouse division director that his opponent, Mr. Vairma, has held since 2012.

In an interview, Mr. Hoffa said the union was broke and divided when he took over and that he was leaving it “financially strong and strong in every which way.”

He said he was proud of the recent UPS contract, calling it “the richest contract ever negotiated” and pointing out that it allows many full-time drivers to make nearly $40 an hour.

He said Mr. O’Brien’s critique of the union’s efforts on Amazon was unfair. “No one was doing it a decade ago,” Mr. Hoffa said. “It’s more complex than just going out and organizing 20 people at a grocery store. He sounds like it’s so simple.”

Mr. O’Brien did not elaborate on his own plans for organizing Amazon, saying he wanted to solicit more input from Teamsters locals, but suggested that they would include bringing political and economic pressure to bear on the company in cities and towns around the country. The union has taken part in efforts to deny Amazon a tax abatement in Indiana and to reject a delivery station in Colorado.

Mr. O’Brien, who once worked as a rigger, transporting heavy equipment to construction sites, was elected president of a large Boston local in 2006. Within a few years, he appeared to be ensconced in the union’s establishment wing.

In a 2013 incident that led to a 14-day unpaid suspension, Mr. O’Brien threatened members of Teamsters for a Democratic Union, a reform group, who were taking on an ally of his in Rhode Island. “They’ll never be our friends,” he said of the challengers. “They need to be punished.”

Mr. O’Brien has apologized for the comments and points out that the reform advocate who led the challenge in Rhode Island, Matt Taibi, is now a supporter who ran on his slate in the recent election.

The break with Mr. Hoffa came in 2017. Early that year, the longtime Teamsters president appointed Mr. O’Brien to a position whose responsibilities included overseeing the union’s contract negotiation with UPS, where more than 300,000 Teamsters now work.

But the union relieved Mr. O’Brien of his position several months later, after he had sought to include critics of Mr. Hoffa on the bargaining team, including the head of a large Louisville local who had narrowly lost the Teamsters presidency to Mr. Hoffa in the previous election despite being considered a long shot.

“I got tremendous pushback,” Mr. O’Brien said in the interview. “I wouldn’t step away from my goal of getting the right people at the table.”

Mr. Hoffa said he didn’t think it would be productive to have the Louisville leader on the team. “I didn’t want to get rid of Sean O’Brien,” he said. “Sean O’Brien was insistent.”

Two years later, Mr. O’Brien appeared at the convention of Teamsters for a Democratic Union and discussed his support for many initiatives long backed by the group, like ending a rule that required a two-thirds vote to reject a contract when fewer than half of eligible members cast ballots.

The union approved its 2018 UPS contract under the two-thirds rule even though it was opposed by a majority of the members who cast a vote.

Mr. Hoffa said that his hands were tied by the rule but that it also served a purpose: “We’re going to see how they’re going to be able to ratify contracts without the two-thirds rule,” he said. “It’s going to be certainly challenging to him.”

Ken Paff, a longtime leader of Teamsters for a Democratic Union, said Mr. O’Brien built credibility with the group by pushing for these reforms at the Teamsters convention this year, where many of them were adopted, including abolition of the two-thirds rule.

“T.D.U. could have never won on our own,” Mr. Paff said. “We’ve put them forward in the past and got creamed, but the O’Brien team backed them.” That team included Fred Zuckerman, the Teamsters leader from Louisville, Ky., who ran against Mr. Hoffa in 2016 and will now be the union’s No. 2 official, its secretary-treasurer.

Mr. Vairma, the Hoffa-backed candidate for president, supported some of the reform measures as well, including ending the two-thirds rule, and seemed to try to seize the reformist mantle himself at times during the campaign.

He portrayed a vote for his slate as a vote to diversify the union; his candidate for secretary-treasurer, Ron Herrera, a vice president, is one of the few Hispanic officials to have served in the union’s top ranks. He also tried to implicate Mr. O’Brien in the union’s slow-footed approach to Amazon. “Sean, you sat on the executive board, and I didn’t see you doing anything during your past nine years of trying to project a proactive program with Amazon,” Mr. Vairma said at one debate.

The two candidates agreed on several issues: that self-driving trucks represent a potential danger to the public and their members; that the union must fight employers’ efforts to improperly classify workers as independent contractors; and that Covid-19 vaccine mandates should not be imposed by employers without first bargaining with unions.

But the differences became apparent during sparring on the UPS contract, which Mr. Vairma accused Mr. O’Brien of “demonizing,” and in their overall posture toward employers.

Mr. Vairma warned that Mr. O’Brien was reckless, while Mr. O’Brien criticized his opponent for being overly timid. “Steve, you already conceded that in your 25-year career, you only struck six times, so UPS knows you’re not going to strike,” he said.

Biden resumes duties after colonoscopy, transfer of power to VP Harris

Biden 51689.jpg f3c19 c0 0 6000

President Biden resumed his presidential duties Friday after a brief transfer of power to Vice President Kamala Harris while he underwent a colonoscopy.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said the president was in “good spirits” after the procedure and will remain at Walter Reed Medical Center while he completes the rest of his physical.

The president spoke with Ms. Harris and his chief of staff, Ron Klain, at about 11:35 a.m. when he recovered from the anesthesia, said Ms. Psaki.

Mr. Biden had transferred power to Ms. Harris while he underwent the endoscopic examination of his rectum and colon.

Mr. Biden, who turns 79 on Saturday, is the nation’s oldest president.

Ms. Harris, the nation’s first woman vice president, became the first woman to assume presidential power.

Mr. Biden had the medical procedure done at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland, as part of his annual physical, Ms. Psaki said.

“As was the case when President George W. Bush had the same procedure in 2002 and 2007, and following the process set out in the Constitution, President Biden will transfer power to the Vice President for the brief period of time when he is under anesthesia,” Ms. Psaki said in a statement. “The Vice President will work from her office in the West Wing during this time.”

Ms. Psaki said the White House will release a full summary of the president’s physical later this afternoon.

Pressed for months about when Mr. Biden would get an exam, the White House repeatedly pledged to be transparent about the results.

Earlier this year, Ms. Psaki promised to make “all of that information available” about the results of his physical.

Ahead of the 2020 presidential election, Mr. Biden released a summary of his medical history, which described him as “healthy” and “vigorous.”

The three-page report found that Mr. Biden was treated for irregular heartbeat, gastroesophageal reflux and allergies.

Former President Trump also underwent a colonoscopy at Walter Reed in 2019. Former White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham alleges in her new book that Mr. Trump refused anesthesia for the procedure so he would not have to transfer power to Vice President Mike Pence. 

Vets get a big jump in retirement pay to help fight inflation

Veterans Day Connecticut 17673.jpg ac093 c0 285 3000

In another sign that the U.S. military is facing the same economic headwinds as the civilian population, the Defense Department announced Friday that military retirees and survivors will receive a 5.9% cost-of-living boost in pay and survivor benefits.

It’s the largest such bump-up in percentage terms since 1982, reflecting sharply increasing numbers for U.S. inflation overall since the summer.

The Defense Department said the hike, which takes effect on Jan. 1, was calculated based on the official Consumer Price Index for the 12 months ending Sept. 30.

The move comes just two days after Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin announced a temporary 10% boost in the basic housing allowance for service members, justifying the move as a way to meet rising economic challenges brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Pentagon officials say those in the ranks are facing rising levels of food insecurity, extended wait times for housing, drastically reduced housing inventories and sudden, sharp increases in rents and home prices in markets across the country.

“Our men and women in uniform and their families have enough to worry about. Basic necessities, like food and housing, shouldn’t be among them,” Mr. Austin told reporters Wednesday, labeling the economic stress a “readiness issue.”

Led by surging food and gas prices and continuing supply chain bottlenecks, U.S. consumer goods inflation jumped by nearly a full percentage point in October, posting the biggest annual gain in 31 years.

The Biden White House said the rising prices reflect temporary pressures largely tied to the recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. But many economists say government spending under Mr. Biden has been a major contributor and that rising prices may not abate for some time to come.

Speaker Pelosi dodges retirement question again

Congress Budget 85326.jpg 2b177 c0 213 5110

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi refused on Friday to say if she plans to run for reelection, or would make her plans known upon the possible final passage of President Biden’s multitrillion-dollar spending package. 

“I’m not here to talk about me, I’m here to talk about ‘Building Back Better’,” Mrs. Pelosi, 81, told The Washington Times at a press conference immediately following the House passage of Mr. Biden’s social welfare bill.

The fate of the legislation remains in question, as the bill heads to an evenly divided Senate. But questions persist about whether Mrs. Pelosi, California Democrat, will retire after serving in the House since 1987.

Mrs. Pelosi was previously asked about her future plans last month by Jake Tapper on CNN’s  “State of the Union,” to which she replied,  “Oh, you think I’m going to make an announcement right here and now?”  

She later added, “Why would I tell you that now… Probably, I would have that conversation with my family first, if you don’t mind.”

However, the House Republicans’ campaign arm is confident about their party’s chances of taking back the speaker’s gavel following the 2022 midterms. The GOP points to recent retirements of key Democratic lawmakers like Reps. Jackie Speier of California and John Yarmouth of Kentucky as signs that Mrs. Pelosi is on her way out soon as well. 

“There is no good news for House Democrats and their historically thin majority. No wonder Speaker Pelosi appears to be planning her retirement,” National Republican Congressional Committee spokesman Mike Berg said in a statement.

Name drop: Guardians’ launch starts with store sign smashing

guardians launch baseball 69056 c0 248 6048

CLEVELAND (AP) — A special opening day for the newly named Cleveland Guardians began with a bang.

Not the one they hoped for, either.

As fans were buying the first available Guardians merchandise on Friday as the team officially transitioned from Indians after 106 years, a sign installed outside the team store at Progressive Field broke free from its mount and crashed to the sidewalk.

“Well, that’s an ominous sign,” yelled one onlooker.

A worker was on a ladder checking bolts when the sign snapped a small section of the ballpark’s stone exterior, fell about 15 feet and smashed into pieces. No one was injured.

Fans began lining up early in the morning to buy new caps, sweatshirts, T-shirts and other gear bearing the Guardians’ logos.

“This kind of exceeds expectations,” said Karen Fox, the team’s director of merchandising. “Having people show up at 6:30, and then we had 100 people in by 9:14. You can kind of see the store looks like we’re having a game today.”

The team also changed its social media handles to complete the changeover, a process that began in June 2020, when owner Paul Dolan announced the Major League Baseball team was dropping Indians in the wake of a social reckoning on racist names and symbols.

The Guardians ran into a legal issue along the way as a local roller derby team also called the Guardians filed a lawsuit alleging trademark infringement. The sides reached an amicable resolution earlier this week allowing both to use the name.

___

More AP MLB: https://apnews.com/hub/MLB and https://twitter.com/AP_Sports

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC.

NATO chief: alliance watching Russian troops near Ukraine

germany politics 87634 c0 17 4880

BERLIN (AP) – NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said Friday that the alliance is closely monitoring an unusual concentration of Russian forces on the border with Ukraine, warning that similar troops were used by Moscow in the past to intervene in neighboring countries.

Speaking at a defense seminar in Berlin, Stoltenberg said NATO had seen a significant military buildup by Russia close to the borders of Ukraine lately.

“We are now closely monitoring the developments along the borders,” he said. “This matters for NATO and we have the capacity, we have the capabilities to collect information, to monitor it closely and to understand what is going on there.”

Stoltenberg said that the alliance had made clear to Russia that “we see their significant military buildup.”

“We see an unusual concentration of forces and we know that they have used these type of forces before to actually intervene and invade other countries, Georgia and Ukraine,” he added.

Moscow provided military support to separatists in the breakaway Georgian region of South Ossetia in 2008.

Russia also annexed Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula in 2014 and has supported a separatist insurgency that broke out that year in eastern Ukraine and still controls territory there.

“We call on Russia to be transparent and to prevent an escalation and to help and to reduce the tensions along the borders with Ukraine,” Stoltenberg said.

The NATO chief also spoke about the challenge posed by China due to its rising economic and military might.

“The aim of China is to have the most advanced and strongest military capabilities within a few decades,” he said. “And they invest: What they do now on nuclear is really big. They are building many new silos for missiles, and they’re investing in extremely advanced technologies.”

“China is coming closer to us: in space, in cyberspace,” Stoltenberg said.

“We see them in Africa. We see them in the Arctic. We see them trying to control critical infrastructure,” he added, noting the recent debates in some NATO countries over Chinese companies’ involvement in building 5G mobile networks.

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC.