Home Blog Page 2058

Biotech investors sound alarm on Senate drug-pricing bill

als drug 61942.jpg 2022.06.15 08.49.04.761054.jpg 2022.08.03 10.13.17.756697 c0 238 5713

A group of biotech investors and doctors are warning that the Senate’s drug-pricing proposal, aimed at lowering skyrocketing prices, would “strike a huge blow” to patient access and halt research on new treatments for Alzheimer’s disease, heart disease and cancer.

Democratic senators last month announced a deal on legislation they say would lower inflation, reduce the deficit, address climate change and cut the cost of prescription drugs.

One of the provisions would require the U.S. government to negotiate the prices of dozens of higher-cost prescription drugs covered under Medicare. Negotiating drug prices has been a long-sought goal of Democrats who want to rein in the power of Big Pharma and respond to public outrage over high prescription drug prices, particularly for seniors.

Under the legislation, drugs that are nine to 13 years away from FDA approval would be subject to negotiated pricing from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The plan would not only save money for seniors, it would save the government $100 billion over the next ten years.

But biotech investors are warning that the types of drugs subjected to negotiations while nine or more years away from FDA approval will lose critical investment dollars.

“The bill as written right now, where CMS would be given the power to essentially set the prices with really draconian punishments for any company that doesn’t accept the prices they want for drugs, would be harmful to some innovation,” Peter Kolchinsky, a biotechnology investor who runs the Boston-based firm RA Capital Management, said Wednesday.  

Investors say the nine-year negotiation threshold, which applies to “small molecule” drugs, would deter investments in research for the kinds of treatments that have become staples in Americans’ medicine cabinets.

Examples of small molecule drugs now on the market include blood pressure medicines, cholesterol-lowering drugs such as Lipitor, and aspirin.

“The harms of this bill, if unchanged, would be that it will put an end to a lot of Pharma revenues for older drugs, but it will eliminate the incentive for Pharma to work with small companies or acquire small companies that are developing small molecule drugs for diseases of aging, because ultimately there won’t be enough profit for anybody, not the small company, not the former, to bother taking on all that risk and cost for just nine years on the market,” Mr. Kolchinsky said.

The biotech investors want Democrats to re-write the legislation to extend the FDA negotiation deadline to 13 years for small molecule drugs.

“Leave it at nine and you just break the system,” Mr. Kolchinsky said.

The Congressional Budget Office, which analyzed the impact of negotiated drug prices, estimated the prescription drug negotiation provision would reduce the number of new drugs introduced in the U.S. market by just 1% over the next 30 years, which amounts to 15 fewer drugs out of 1,300 that will be produced.

“The alarm bells need to be put into the context of other estimates by the Congressional Budget Office that indicate that the number of drugs not coming to market would be relatively small,” Tricia Neuman, senior vice president of the Kaiser Family Foundation and executive director of the KFF program on Medicare policy, told The Washington Times.

Ms. Neuman said the question left for biotech investors, if the bill becomes law, is whether “a nine-year period without negotiations, without any type of price constraints established in a negotiation-price process, is sufficient to bring a drug to market.”

“The CBO implicitly is suggesting the answer is yes, given the small number of drugs that they think would not come to market,” she said.

But biotech investors say the proposed regulations in the Senate bill would have a profound impact on the development of new drugs, which Dr. Gaurav Gupta, founder of Ascendant BioCapital, said has experienced “a golden age of innovation” with new treatments that have extended the lives of cancer patients and successfully treated other diseases.

“It seems like those wheels are starting to turn almost against the sector here in a way that is not only counterproductive but is baffling to most of us,” Dr. Gupta said.

One investment analyst said cutting drug prices under the Senate plan will have a $345 billion market impact by 2031 and force investors to take on more risk by reducing revenue on some drugs by 55% or more and in some cases, 100%.

“When you drop by 55% revenue, you don’t get 55% less drugs, you get 70% or 80% less drugs,” said Duane Schulthess, managing director of Vital Transformation, which represents the drug industry.

The Medicare provisions in the Senate bill go further than negotiating drug prices.

Under the legislation, drug companies beginning this year would have to provide rebates if they raise the price of any drug on the market faster than the rate of inflation. 

The bill would also eliminate the 5% coinsurance requirement above the catastrophic threshold in 2024 and cap Medicare prescription drug out-of-pocket spending at $2,000 beginning in 2025. Overall, the Medicare changes would save the government nearly $300 billion over the next decade.

Advocates for lowering drug prices say Big Pharma has jacked up drug prices beyond the rate of inflation to raise profits while thwarting the advance of generic and less-expensive equivalents to their treatments.

In the first week of July, pharmaceutical companies increased prices on more than 100 brand-name prescription drugs. The companies hiked prices on 800 brand-name drugs in January.

“Those price increases have continued to rival or exceed the rate of inflation as part of a long-standing trend of brand name drug companies seeking to maximize profits by increasing prices on drugs that face little or no competition,” said Jon Conradi, a spokesperson for CSRXP, which advocates for market-based reductions in drug costs. “They’re able to continue hiking those prices because they game the patent system and engage in other anti-competitive practices to extend monopolies and maintain exclusive pricing power.”

RSS

‘It stinks’: Nationals fans understand Soto trade, but that doesn’t mean they like it

Nationals Dodgers Baseball 88410.jpg 351d8 c0 241 5784

Sorry Nationals fans, Tuesday wasn’t just a bad dream. Juan Soto is actually a Padre. 

Tuesday’s trade was something that Nationals fans have feared for months, as Soto wasn’t just one of the best hitters in the world but also one of the few remaining players from the World Series team in 2019. 

No one knows how the trade will play out. On the surface, it feels like a fair deal — Soto, while a generational talent, is just one player, and the Nationals got back five promising prospects in return. The winner of the trade may not be known for over a decade. 

General manager Mike Rizzo said after making the trade that it was the pragmatic thing to do, especially after Soto and his agent, Scott Boras, turned down the would-be record-breaking $440 million contract the Nationals offered in July. 

The logic behind the trade, though, doesn’t lessen the sting. 

“It stinks,” Nationals fan Valerie Barger said before the team’s game against the Mets Wednesday. “I can’t say we didn’t see it coming, but I think we all hoped it wasn’t coming.”

The consensus from Nationals fans at the ballpark Wednesday was that they weren’t surprised. The leak in mid-July that Soto was on the trading block after turning down the mega deal gave fans time to go through the grieving process. For Northern Virginia resident Michael Carter, he reached acceptance pretty quickly. 

“I wasn’t surprised about the trade,” said Carter, who sports a 2019 World Series tattoo with the Nationals logo on his left forearm. “I knew it was coming. It was just a matter of what kind of haul we’d get for him.”

The flip side of the deal — Soto and Josh Bell in exchange for six Padres players — is the amount of promising talent the Nationals got in return. Rizzo said he thinks the move will “accelerate” the team’s rebuild, which began last summer with the Trea Turner-Max Scherzer trade to the Dodgers. 

The core of the deal was a group of four youngsters: two former top 100 prospects who made their MLB debuts this season in shortstop C.J. Abrams and southpaw MacKenzie Gore; and a pair of current top 100 prospects in outfielders Robert Hassell III and James Wood, both of whom are still in the minors. The team also procured 18-year-old flamethrower Jarlin Susana and veteran first baseman Luke Voit. 

Hassell, Wood and Susana now rank as the Nationals’ Nos. 1, 3 and 8 prospects, respectively, on MLB.com. According to FanGraphs, Washington’s farm system went from the 24th-ranked in MLB to eighth after the trade. 

“We got a lot of good prospects,” first-year season-ticket holder Tom Raneses said. “At first, I thought management was making a mistake. But now that he’s gone, I’m hoping these select players have more potential in the long run.”

While the trade is what matters, the fulcrum of the Soto dilemma was when he turned down a contract that would have paid him more total dollars than any other player in MLB history. But one of the main reasons Soto and Boras turned down the offer was due to its length. The $440 million price tag is eye-popping. But spread across 15 years, the average annual value is $29.3 million — a figure that wouldn’t put him in the top 15 among active MLB players. 

“I don’t think the offer was all that great,” Carter, 29, said. “I expected a super-max deal where he gets the most money of anyone ever. The amount he was getting per year was less than [Mike] Trout, less than other top players in the league.”

Raneses, a 62-year-old D.C. resident, said the move to a contending club like the Padres is what’s best for Soto, a superstar at just 23 years old. He’ll join fellow phenoms Manny Machado and Fernando Tatis Jr. in San Diego, making potential playoff runs for each of the next three seasons. 

Meanwhile, the Nationals, who already owned the worst record in the majors when they had Soto, are staring down the barrel of a long August and September — and maybe all of 2023 as well. Between losing Soto, uncertainty over ownership and being hamstrung with a Stephen Strasburg contract that is arguably the biggest albatross in baseball, the Nationals are in a precarious position. 

But Carter isn’t worried, because the Nationals have been in a similar rebuild in the past — and won a world championship a decade later. 

“I’m not super concerned,” he said. “You have to think about where we were back in 2009 and how long it took us to get to the point where we actually won a World Series. I think Rizzo knows what he’s doing.”

For Barger, a 26-year-old D.C. resident, the trade was a tough pill to swallow. But, for her, being a baseball fan is about far more than just one player. 

“For as sad as I am, it doesn’t mean I’m not a Nats fan anymore,” she said. “I’m still going to come. At the end of the day, you have to realize this is a business.” 

Mickelson, others sue PGA Tour over LIV Golf suspensions

liv golf 51810 c0 173 4146

Phil Mickelson, Bryson DeChambeau and a group of players who defected to Saudi-funded LIV Golf filed an antitrust lawsuit Wednesday against the PGA Tour, the first step in a legal fight that could define the rules of where players can compete.

The Wall Street Journal first reported the filing in U.S. District Court in San Francisco. The complaint also includes an application for a temporary restraining order by Talor Gooch, Hudson Swafford and Matt Jones to compete in the FedEx Cup playoffs.

Six players who have competed in LIV Golf events are among the top 125 in the FedEx Cup standings and would be eligible for the start of the PGA Tour’s postseason that starts next week.

The PGA Tour has suspended members for playing in LIV Golf events without a release to play in tournaments the same week of a PGA Tour event. The tour does not allow releases for tournaments held in North America. The last two LIV Golf events – with $25 million in prize money for 54 holes with no cut – were in Oregon and New Jersey.

The Journal reported that details of the lawsuit indicate the PGA Tour suspended Mickelson in March for allegedly recruiting players to LIV Golf. When he applied for reinstatement in June, the tour denied it because he had played in the first Saudi event held outside London.

Copyright © 2022 The Washington Times, LLC.

Driver in hit and run crash that killed Nicki Minaj’s father sentenced

Nicki Minajs Father Killed 74574.jpg 09df8 c0 110 1620

MINEOLA, N.Y. — The driver in a hit-and-run crash that killed the father of rapper Nicki Minaj last year was sentenced Wednesday to a year in jail, in keeping with a promise the judge made when the man pleaded guilty in May.

Charles Polevich, who pleaded guilty to leaving the scene and tampering with evidence in the crash on New York’s Long Island that killed Robert Maraj, was also ordered to pay a $5,000 fine and had his driver’s license suspended for six months.

Polevich’s lawyer, Marc Gann, suggested his client may have had a medical issue at the time of the crash and that he wasn’t fully aware of what had happened when he fled.

Polevich, 72, said in court that he’s “been heartsick since realizing the extent of the tragedy” and that there was “no excuse” for his behavior.

Maraj’s widow, Carol Maraj, said in court that Polevich had left her husband “like a dog on the street” and that sparing him a longer jail sentence was a “slap in the face for the family,” Newsday reported.

Polevich struck Maraj, 64, while Maraj was walking along Roslyn Road in Mineola in February 2021. Polevich stopped briefly to ask Maraj if he was OK, but didn’t call for help, prosecutors said.

Instead, Polevich went home, parked the car – a white, 1992 Volvo station wagon – in his garage and covered it with a tarp, prosecutors said. Maraj was taken to a hospital and pronounced dead the next day.

Prosecutors sought a sentence of one to three years behind bars, but Nassau County Judge Howard Sturim said in May, when Polevich pleaded guilty, that he would get “no more than one year in jail.”

Brendan Brosh, a spokesperson for the Nassau County district attorney’s office, said that “given the severity of the defendant’s conduct,” prosecutors felt a stiffer sentence was warranted.

“We continue to express our condolences to the family of Robert Maraj,” Brosh said.

Gann asked for a 90-day jail sentence, arguing that other factors outside of Polevich’s control were partially to blame for the crash, including road construction, street lights that weren’t working and Maraj’s physical condition.

Maraj’s widow, Carol Maraj, is suing Polevich over the crash.

Polevich, who had been splitting time between Long Island and Guam, where he runs a drilling and water purification business, surrendered to police a few days after the crash.

Detectives said they used pieces of surveillance video to track the Volvo involved in the crash to Polevich’s Mineola home.

Nicki Minaj, the platinum-selling, Grammy-nominated rapper of “Anaconda,” “Super Bass” and other hits, was born Onika Tanya Maraj in Trinidad and was raised in Queens.

In a post on her website, Minaj, 39, called her father’s death “the most devastating loss of my life.”

Copyright © 2022 The Washington Times, LLC.

Jennette McCurdy Is Ready to Move Forward, and to Look Back

07mccurdy1 facebookJumbo

When Jennette McCurdy was 16, she was in her third year on “iCarly,” the hit teen sitcom on Nickelodeon. Millions of young viewers admired her for her comic portrayal of Sam Puckett, the wisecracking pal of its title character, and she was proud that her lucrative work was helping to support her family.

McCurdy was also living under the stringent control of her mother, Debra, who oversaw her career, determined her meals — her dinners consisted of shredded pieces of low-cal bologna and lettuce sprayed with dressing — and even administered her showers.

Her mother gave her breast and vaginal exams, which she said were inspections for cancer, and shaved her daughter’s legs while McCurdy remained largely uneducated about the changes her body was experiencing.

She struggled with obsessive-compulsive disorder, eating disorders and anxiety triggered by the constant attention she received as a celebrity, but she felt trapped in her work. She also believed she owed her unfaltering loyalty to her mother, who had recovered from breast cancer when Jennette was very young, only for her cancer to return in 2010, at the height of her daughter’s fame.

Debra McCurdy died in 2013, and Jennette, now 30, is still reckoning with the gravitational pull exerted by her mother, who steered her to the trade that gave her visibility and financial stability while she controlled virtually every aspect of her daughter’s existence.

When Jennette McCurdy wrote a memoir, which Simon and Schuster will publish on Aug. 9, it was clear to her that her relationship with her mother would provide its narrative force. “It’s the heartbeat of my life,” she said recently.

The book is titled “I’m Glad My Mom Died,” and its cover bears the image of McCurdy, a narrow half-smile on her face, holding a pink funeral urn with confetti strands peeking over its rim. The presentation might be off-putting to some readers; the author is well aware. But she also feels it accurately encapsulates a coming-of-age story that is alternately harrowing and mordantly funny.

When you have grown up as she has, feeling tenderness and anger toward a person you’ve seen wield immense power while fighting for her own life, she said, “You can’t believe how hard and how laughable it is at the same time. That’s completely my sense of humor.”

“I feel like I’ve done the processing and put in the work to earn a title or a thought that feels provocative,” she added.

Though McCurdy may have the résumé of a seasoned Hollywood veteran, she carried herself like a wide-eyed tourist on a visit to New York in late June. Over afternoon tea at the BG Restaurant in midtown Manhattan, she gazed at fellow patrons, asked for Broadway theater recommendations and chided herself about a transcendental meditation class she’d taken near her home in Los Angeles.

“So far, I haven’t seen any results,” she said with a chuckle, “but we’ll see.”

When it comes to new endeavors, McCurdy said, “I think things should feel natural. So much of my life was about forcing or pushing things. So when something feels like it’s working, I’ll let that be, and anything else can fall by the wayside.”

As McCurdy recounts in her memoir, she was 6 when she started auditioning for acting roles, having been shepherded into the work by her mother, who was herself discouraged from becoming an actress by her own parents.

Growing up in Southern California, McCurdy was cast in TV commercials and shows like “Mad TV,” “Malcolm in the Middle” and “CSI” before landing “iCarly,” which had its debut in 2007. Yet she never had any illusions about who was really benefiting from these accomplishments. As she writes of the moment she learned she had booked “iCarly,” “Everything’s going to be better. Mom will finally be happy. Her dream has come true.”

McCurdy endured various embarrassments and indignities at Nickelodeon, where she writes of being photographed in a bikini at a wardrobe fitting and being encouraged to drink alcohol by an intimidating figure she simply calls the Creator. In situations where her mother was present, Debra did not intervene or speak up, instructing Jennette that this was the price of showbiz success: “Everyone wants what you have,” she would tell her daughter.

When McCurdy was promised an “iCarly” spinoff, she assumed she’d be given her own show — only to receive a co-starring slot on “Sam & Cat,” which paired her with the future pop-music sensation Ariana Grande.

There, she says her superiors on these shows prevented her from pursuing career opportunities outside the show while Grande thrived in her extracurricular work. As McCurdy writes, “What finally undid me was when Ariana came whistle-toning in with excitement because she had spent the previous evening playing charades at Tom Hanks’s house. That was the moment I broke.”

As McCurdy grew older and more independent, her relationship with her mother became further strained. The book reproduces an email in which her mother calls her “a SLUT,” “a FLOOZY” and “an UGLY MONSTER,” then concludes with a request for money for a refrigerator. When Debra had a recurrence of cancer and died, Jennette, then 21, was liberated — and left to navigate a complex world without her guidance, contending with destructive romantic relationships, bulimia, anorexia and alcohol abuse.

“iCarly” ended its original run in 2012, and “Sam & Cat” ran just one season from 2013-14, after which, McCurdy writes, she turned down a $300,000 offer from Nickelodeon if she agreed never to speak publicly about her experiences at the network. (A press representative for Nickelodeon declined to comment.)

She was free to reclaim her personal life and pursue other projects, like the Netflix science-fiction series “Between.” But she found it difficult to let go of the resentment from how she’d been treated when she was younger. As she said in an interview, “It felt like all these decisions were being made on my behalf and I was the last one to know about them. That’s really infuriating. It led to a lot of rage.”

Even now, McCurdy found that revisiting the era of her child stardom resurfaced raw feelings about a parent, and an industry, that had failed to protect her.

“My whole childhood and adolescence were very exploited,” she said, her eyes brimming with tears. “It still gives my nervous system a reaction to say it. There were cases where people had the best intentions and maybe didn’t know what they were doing. And also cases where they did — they knew exactly what they were doing.”

Marcus McCurdy, the oldest of Jennette’s three brothers, said that their mother was consistently volatile when they were growing up.

“You were always walking on eggshells — is it going to be nice mom or crazy mom today?” he said. “One day she’d be fine, the next day she’d be yelling at everybody. Every holiday was super overdramatic. She’d lose her mind on Christmas if something wasn’t perfect.”

Friends and colleagues from Jennette McCurdy’s time as a child actor said they could sense the tension in her relationship with her mother, even if they did not yet know the exact details.

“Jennette can be outgoing, very forward and bright and electric,” said David Archuleta, the pop singer and “American Idol” finalist. “I could also tell she was very guarded, very protective of her mom and they were very close.”

Archuleta, whose career was closely controlled by his father when he was a minor, said such arrangements can be destructive for children.

“Because you’re always with that parent, they don’t really let you around anyone else,” Archuleta said. “You don’t look at it as a control thing — you look at it as, ‘Oh, they’re looking out for me.’ And they make you feel like everyone is against you.”

Over time, Archuleta added, the parent may turn toxic. “It gets to where it’s like, ‘You can’t make any decisions on your own. You can’t do anything on your own. You’re too dumb.’”

Miranda Cosgrove, the star of “iCarly,” said that though she and McCurdy quickly became close on the show, she was initially unaware of many difficulties her friend was facing, which McCurdy only revealed as they became older.

“When you’re young, you’re so in your own head,” Cosgrove said. “You can’t imagine that people around you are having much harder struggles.”

In a softer voice, Cosgrove added, “You don’t expect things like that from the person in the room who’s making everyone laugh.”

For McCurdy, opening up about herself to the wider world has been a long-term process. In her late teens and early 20s, she wrote essays for The Wall Street Journal that shared some of her insights into child stardom. But today she feels she was not fully candid.

“If I had been truthful at that time,” she explained, “I would have said, ‘Yeah, I wrote this and then I went and made myself throw up for four minutes afterward.’”

A few years ago, McCurdy started writing a new series of personal essays, including several about her mother, and shared them with her manager at the time. “My manager sent me back a nice email that said, ‘This is great — I don’t really know what to do with this.’ I’ll never forget the ‘xoxo’ at the end.” (McCurdy no longer works with that manager.)

Instead, she began performing a one-woman show, also called “I’m Glad My Mom Died,” in Los Angeles. Though the pandemic impeded plans to take the show on the road, McCurdy used some of her down time to craft the memoir. “I really wanted to build it out a lot more, get more into the childhood aspect of the story and work through the arc in a way that you only can with a book,” she explained.

Marcus McCurdy said he supported his sister’s decision to write her memoir, even if her calling it “I’m Glad My Mom Died” has caused some consternation in the family.

“Our grandmother is very upset about that title,” Marcus said, adding that he and his sister share a similar sense of humor. “It’s more of a coping mechanism,” he said. “You can either be like, ‘Woe is me, my life is horrible.’ Or you find the humor in these things that are really tragic.”

Archuleta also said it was empowering for McCurdy to write her book. “It’s given her back some of her strength, her confidence,” he said.

McCurdy is writing another set of essays about coming into her own in her 20s, as well as a novel. (Its protagonist, she said, is “either who I wish I could be in some aspects, or who I hope I never am in other aspects. But it’s probably me, right?”)

Aside from a few watch parties that her family held for her earliest episodic TV work, McCurdy told me, “I’ve never seen any of the shows that I’ve been on.” For her, these were fraught documents of her suffering and unwelcome reminders of the helplessness she felt at the time.

A few years ago, after the cancellation of her Netflix series, McCurdy decided to take a break from acting. As she writes in the memoir, “I want my life to be in my hands. Not an eating disorder’s or a casting director’s or an agent’s or my mom’s. Mine.” She did not take part in a recent revival of “iCarly” on Paramount+. But McCurdy said that her experience with her one-woman show has shown her there might be ways that performance could be constructive for her in the future.

“It felt significant in repairing some of the really weighted, complicated relationships that I had with acting,” she said. “It felt like finally I’m saying my words and saying things I want to be saying. I’m myself.”

Though McCurdy can still find it uncomfortable to reflect on her past, it also makes her hopeful to focus on the present and to see the friends and colleagues who are part of her life because she alone chose for them to be in it.

“I have people around me now that are so supportive and so loving,” she said. “It makes me tearful with joy. I feel so safe. I feel so much trust and so much openness.”

Iowa school district sued for hiding ‘gender support plans’ from parents

virus outbreak schools 68305.jpg 2022.04.20 07.48.38.121791 c55 0 2945

Seven unnamed parents have filed a federal lawsuit against an Iowa public school district for hiding students’ gender transitions from their mothers and fathers.

According to the lawsuit, filed Tuesday in federal court, the Linn-Mar Community School District is violating “a century of Supreme Court precedent” by keeping secret “temporary” files on students and punishing classmates who dispute their new genders.

The district’s school board voted April 25 to approve the “Transgender and Students Nonconforming to Gender Role Stereotypes” policy. It allows students starting at age 12 to create a “gender support plan” facilitating their transition to transgender or non-binary sexual identities.

“The Policy authorizes children to make fundamentally important decisions concerning their gender identity without any parental involvement and to then hide these decisions from their parents,” states the complaint, which the conservative Parents Defending Education filed on behalf of the parents.

Linn-Mar’s policy adds that classmates who fail to “respect a student’s gender identity” can be suspended or expelled for violating the district’s anti-bullying/harassment policy, equal education opportunity policy, and Title IX. Faculty and staff may be fired on the same grounds.

According to the complaint, the seven plaintiffs have children in the district who either refuse to acknowledge the pronouns of gender-transitioning peers or who are “likely to be subjected” to the gender support plans without parental knowledge or consent.

The lawsuit asks the court to overturn the policy for violating the First Amendment right of students to voice their belief in two biological sexes, as well as the 14th Amendment right of parents to “establish a home and bring up children” and “to control the education of their own.”

Linn-Mar Community School District, which includes the Cedar Rapids area, did not respond Wednesday to a request for comment.

By keeping the gender support plans in a temporary file, the lawsuit notes that the district is skirting the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), which entitles parents to access their children’s permanent files.

RSS

Haley Stevens defeats Andy Levin in Michigan primary pitting two Democratic House members

Election 2022 House 05380.jpg 43b77 c0 338 4058

Rep. Haley Stevens, a first-term lawmaker, defeated Rep. Andy Levin in a Michigan Democratic House primary Tuesday night that pitted the two incumbents against one another.

Ms. Stevens, 39, declared victory when she opened a double-digit lead in the primary battle.

Ms. Stevens had  60% of the vote after polls closed Tuesday evening and Mr. Levin, 61, had 40%, with about 57% of precincts reporting.
Mr. Levin conceded by phone around 10:30 p.m. EDT, according to his campaign.

“My friends, it’s not a mystery why we beat the odds. We stayed in Congress because we listened. I listened,” Ms. Stevens said in declaring victory in Birmingham shortly after 9 p.m.

While both were forced into the newly re-mapped 11th Congressional District, Ms. Stevens was granted 45% of her original district in the new district, while Mr. Levin was left with only 25% of his old district in the newly formed seat.

Mr. Levin, who comes from a powerful Michigan political family and began his career in Congress in 2018, was outspent by the more moderate Ms. Stevens two to one.

Ms. Stevens received $3.2 million from the United Democracy Project, an AIPAC-aligned Super PAC, while Mr. Levin upset pro-Israel organizations for sponsoring the progressive-backed ”Two-State Solution Act” that would make the creation of an independent Palestinian state an official U.S. policy.

However, the J-Street PAC, a more liberal pro-Israel organization advocating for a Two-State solution, supported Mr. Levin.

This article was based in part on wire-service reports.

Kansas voters reject pro-life amendment to state constitution

Election 2022 Abortion Kansas 28343.jpg 7ad03 c0 389 5499

Kansas voters rejected Tuesday a ballot measure to remove abortion rights from the state constitution, handing a resounding victory to the pro-choice movement in the first popular vote on the issue since the fall of Roe v. Wade.

With 90% of the vote counted, the No State Right to Abortion amendment was behind by 62.2% to 37.8%, marking a disappointing defeat for pro-life advocates and a pivotal win for Planned Parenthood and pro-choice groups.

“I’ve seen enough: in a huge victory for the pro-choice side, the Kansas constitutional amendment to remove protections of abortion rights fails,” tweeted Dave Wasserman, House editor for the Cook Political Report.

The amendment, also called Value Them Both, would have affirmed that “there is no Kansas constitutional right to abortion,” overriding a 2019 Kansas Supreme Court decision holding that the state constitution guaranteed the right to “personal autonomy,” including abortion.

If passed, the measure would have cleared the way for the Republican-led legislature to tighten restrictions on abortion.

Women may obtain elective abortions in Kansas up to 20 weeks’ gestation, or 22 weeks after their last menstrual cycle, and then afterward when the woman’s health is severely compromised. The state also requires parental consent for minors; pre-procedure ultrasounds; counseling, and a 24-hour waiting period.

The Kansas outcome comes as an early barometer of the broader electorate’s thinking on the emotional issue and is somewhat surprising given the state’s conservative bent.

Democrats hope the court’s ruling could bolster their odds of defending the House and Senate in what is otherwise shaping up to be a tough election year.

Supporters of the effort were mum about whether they would pursue an outright abortion ban if the referendum passed.

Al Qaeda leader’s death renews debate over hasty U.S. Afghanistan withdrawal

afghanistan unhappiest country 21281 c0 280 6720

The successful U.S. intelligence drone strike that killed longtime al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri at his Kabul safe house has also reignited the debates over President Biden’s chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan last year and whether the country’s new Taliban leaders are honoring a pledge to rein in terror groups operating on Afghan soil.

Mr. Biden and administration officials say the death of one of the world’s most wanted terrorists underscores the withdrawal’s success because — despite widespread skepticism — U.S. intelligence operatives were able to track and take out al-Zawahri without any American troops on the ground.

But critics, including a number of Republican lawmakers, said al-Zawahri’s ability to set up up operations and evade capture for so long in Afghanistan’s capital highlights fears that the nation is re-emerging as a safe haven for al Qaeda and other terror groups such as Islamic State since the Taliban came to power last year.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said Mr. Biden “deserves credit” for approving the mission.

“But al-Zawahiri’s return to downtown Kabul further indicates that Afghanistan is again becoming a major thicket of terrorist activity following the president’s decision to withdraw U.S. forces,” the Kentucky Republican said in a statement. “Killing al-Zawahiri is a success, but the underlying resurgence of al Qaeda terrorists into Afghanistan is a growing threat that was foreseeable and avoidable. The administration needs a comprehensive plan to rebuild our capacity to combat it.”

For years, al-Zawahri topped the FBI’s most wanted list and the State Department offered a $25 million reward for information that led to his capture. He was one of the masterminds of Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and took over al Qaeda in 2011, following Osama bin Laden’s death in 2011.


SEE ALSO: U.S. slams Taliban for hosting al Qaeda leader killed in drone strike


The drone strike that killed al-Zawahri came nearly one year after U.S. and allied troops hastily withdrew from Afghanistan as the U.S.-backed government collapsed in the face of a Taliban offensive. The resulting chaos and casualties not only ended two decades of U.S. military involvement in Afghanistan but sent Mr. Biden’s poll numbers on a descent that the White House has been unable to reverse.

Exacerbated by inflation and other economic woes, Mr. Biden’s approval ratings remain at their lowest levels since he was sworn into office in January 2021.

Badly needed win

The death of al-Zawahri is a badly needed foreign policy win for Mr. Biden, whose flagging fortunes are starting to reverse after last week’s Senate breakthrough on his climate and spending bill. It also strengthens his claims that America can still wage counterterrorist operations in Afghanistan after the restoration of Taliban rule.

“This is a particularly notable accomplishment for President Biden, who decided to withdraw remaining U.S. forces and leave Afghanistan to the Taliban, relying only on ‘over-the-horizon’ counterterrorism operations against al Qaeda,” said William F. Wechsler, senior director at Atlantic Council think tank, who acknowledged he and many analysts doubted the far-range monitoring of terror threats was feasible.

“But [with al-Zawahri’s death], Biden and his team will go to sleep tonight with a deep sense of vindication and take a well-deserved victory lap,” Mr. Wechsler said.


SEE ALSO: U.S. hits Russia with new round of sanctions as Ukraine war grinds on


Al-Zawahri was killed Saturday night when a U.S. intelligence drone fired two Hellfire missiles at him as he stood onto the balcony of an al Qaeda safe house in Kabul, a senior administration official said. He was the only one killed in the strike.

Intelligence operatives had been tracking the Egyptian-born al Qaeda leader since April, updating the president over the past three months.  

Speaking about the strike on Monday, Mr. Biden doubled down on his belief that the U.S. could contain terrorism threats from Afghanistan without American combat boots on the ground.

“I made a promise to the American people that we’d continue to conduct effective counterterrorism operations in Afghanistan and beyond,” Mr. Biden said. “We’ve done just that.”

Questions and answers

But others say the attack raises as many questions as answers. Chief among them is how al-Zawahri was able to maintain a residence in a prominent Kabul neighborhood close to many official Afghan government buildings. They say it’s evidence that the Taliban has yet to follow through on pledges to curb terrorist groups on its soil, and that some factions of the Taliban government may actually have kept up ties with al Qaeda even after coming to power.

U.S.-led forces led bin Laden, al-Zawahri and other Taliban leaders from Kabul in the 2001 invasion in response to the September 11 attacks. The terror leaders were said to be hiding in the lawless borders separating Afghanistan and Pakistan, and bin Laden himself was located and killed in a provincial Pakistani city. 

“The Taliban’s Afghanistan is a sanctuary for al Qaeda,” said Katherine Zimmerman, a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. “Zawahri clearly felt safer in the Taliban-run capital than in his old hideout.”

Administration officials pushed back on the idea that Afghanistan has become a staging ground for Islamic terror groups to plot attacks against the U.S.

“Ask the members of al Qaeda how safe they feel in Afghanistan right now,” White House national security spokesman John Kirby told reporters. “I think we proved.. this weekend that it isn’t a safe haven and it isn’t going to be going forward.”

But the administration has also released concerning evidence about al Qaeda’s presence in Afghanistan and indications that the Taliban is offering refuge to the terror organization that has waged attacks on the U.S.

White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan said Tuesday that members of the Haqqani Network, which the U.S. considers an Islamic terror group with strong ties to the Taliban, were aware that al-Zawahri was in Kabul. Mr. Sullivan said that even though al-Zawahri wasn’t involved in the day-to-day planning attacks on the U.S., he continued to pose “a severe threat against the U.S.”

Mr. Sullivan told CBS News that the U.S. is communicating with the Taliban about their “obligation” not to allow al Qaeda to use Afghanistan as a base for plotting attacks.

The Doha Agreement signed by the Trump administration in February 2020 outlined the terms of the U.S.’s withdrawal from Afghanistan. In exchange for a phased pullout of foreign troops, the Taliban pledged not to attack American forces and not to allow al Qaeda or other terror groups to launch attacks from within the country.

The Taliban Tuesday condemned the U.S. strike as “a clear violation” of the Doha deal. In response, the U.S. insisted that the Taliban’s harboring of al-Zawahri was also a violation of the Doha agreement, thus justifying the strike.

Since the U.S. has vacated Afghanistan, al Qaeda leadership has been advising the Taliban, a United Nations Security Council report released last month said.

“The Taliban’s victory in Afghanistan has also buoyed the global al Qaeda network as local leaders use the Taliban’s roadmap to outlast the local counterterrorism forces,” Ms. Zimmerman said.

The United Nations report found that al Qaeda’s threat remained high in conflict-rich regions like Afghanistan and its neighboring countries, though the U.N. also warned that the terror group could strike in a non-conflict area as well.

Al Qaeda has faced only limited interference from the Taliban, and some of its senior officials are providing advisory services to the Kabul government, the report said.

That same report concluded that ISIS-K, the Islamic State offshoot that carried out an attack last year near the Kabul International Airport that killed more than a dozen U.S. military personnel and more than 150 Afghan civilians, has also become increasingly active in Afghanistan.

Meet the criminal trio: Misak Khidiryan, Olga Alisimenko, and Sergey Alisimenko, their shady schemes in the DPR and the LPR, and their ties with the Federal Security Service in Russia

According to numerous Ukrainian media, the country’s law enforcement agencies have recently found another conversion center in Ukraine. Surprisingly enough, this institution is led by multimillionaire Misak Khidiryan.

According to law enforcement officials, Misak Khidiryan is the main leader of an organized criminal group. Furthermore, this person is believed to be associated with organized criminal groups from Armenia, which used the proceeds of their operation to support the Russian Federation which is currently having a war with Ukraine.

In addition, this criminal business is also led by the following people: Sergey Alisimenko and his wife Olga Alisimenko.

Let us start with the first participant of this criminal trio. Olga Alisimenko (born on November 15, 1986) is considered to be the main leader and manager of the conversion center. She had problems with the law in the past and was convicted under Article 190 of the Criminal Code for committing fraudulent actions. The office of this “business lady” is located in the prestigious ‘Parus’ center. Currently, Olga is in hiding. Most probably, she is hiding on the territory of the Russian Federation.

Where did the money of Misak Khidiryan come from?

The second member of the criminal trio is Olga’s husband Sergey Alisimenko (born on February 25, 1977). He is well-known in specific circles by his “Alisa” nickname. Modern script writers can easily use the biography of this man to shoot an astonishing criminal thriller. Many years ago, Alisimenko was a member of the gang of the infamous “Prysch”. When the leader of the group was killed, Alexander Lischenko aka Licha decided to become its new leader. He is a true master of committing particularly serious crimes: racketeering, theft, robbery, intimidation of businessmen, and seizure of other people’s property. Unfortunately, “Alisa” betrayed his comrades and ran away from them. Furthermore, after moving to the side of competitors, he tried to kill his former chief. Already on May 4, 2021, the car of his boss aka “Licha” was fired upon. However, those bandits were unlucky. They managed to kill the driver, but their main target remained alive.

The third character of our story is the most mature and interesting. We are talking about Misak Khidiryan, a citizen of the Russian Federation, who has been engaged in various financial frauds on the territory of Ukraine and Russia for a long time. In addition to the shady scheme created with the Alisimenko couple, Khidiryan is involved in illegal VAT refunds, and also participates in the process of understating the customs value of goods entering through L’viv and Odesa customs. It is clear that such ‘feats’ would be simply impossible without serious help from the management of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine.

hidiryan misak oganesovich.
Misak Khidiryan

Alisimenko was involved in the organization and implementation of particularly serious crimes. In addition, Misak Khidiryan was also involved in similar activities. Both of our heroes know everything about robberies, thefts, extortion, and intimidation of entrepreneurs, and taking over someone else’s property. Sergei Alisimenko is not just a bandit, but also a traitor who left his friends and, having gone over to the side of the enemies, tried to kill his ex-boss. Last year, his car was attacked by criminals, but they managed to kill only his driver. The Licha himself managed to stay alive.

The second member of the criminal organization was the wife of Sergey, Olga Alisimenko born in 1986. In addition, she was the main organizer of the conversion center with Misak Khidiryan.

In the past, Olga Alisimenko was also convicted of fraud under Article 190 of the Criminal Code. While doing her “business”, Olga had an office in the prestigious “Parus” center. However, currently, this “business lady” is on the run and hiding in the territory of the aggressor country.

The last participant in this story is Misak Khidiryan. He is a citizen of Russia and he played the main role in this entire scheme. For many years in a row, this person has been doing financial fraud on the territory of our country and a number of neighboring countries. In addition to the criminal history with the conversion center, Khidiryan was directly involved in illegal VAT refund schemes. He participated in reducing the customs value of products that passed through the Odesa and L’viv customs. He carried out these schemes thanks to serious and influential friends among the management of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine.

In order to commit even more crimes, Misak Khidiryan acquired a fake identification code and created dozens of fictitious companies that were headed by men of straw. Khidiryan used these companies to carry out all illegal operations.

Another important element of his biography is the face of close cooperation with the Federal Security Service in Russia. In fact, this person should not stay on the territory of our country since information about him can be found in the database of unwanted migrants.

The highlight of this whole story is the fact that Olga Alisimenko had intimacy with Khidiryan and even gave birth to a child. However, this fact is carefully and actively hidden from the public. It is also worth adding that Olga enjoys her life. Despite the status of an unemployed person, she is the owner of two luxury cars (Porsche and Mercedes), 1 hectare of land in the very center of Kyiv, and a 160 square meters apartment on Shelkovichnaya Street. She also owns premises in Podil Area, as well as a land plot in the Boryspil District.

178996 8

Finally, we will reveal a stunning fact: According to unconfirmed reports, this criminal trio was covered by Roman Nasirov, who is a former people’s deputy and ex-head of the State Fiscal Service.

We would also like to highlight the fact that there is a reason to hide the entire story of Misak Khidiryan. In fact, we are talking about hundreds of stolen millions and the geopolitical fiasco of neighboring Ukraine.