VATICAN CITY (AP) — Cardinals failed once more Thursday morning to discover a successor to Pope Francis, sending black smoke billowing up via the Sistine Chapel chimney after two extra inconclusive rounds of conclave voting.

With no candidate securing the required two-thirds majority, or 89 votes, the world might want to wait longer for a brand new chief of the Catholic Church. The 133 cardinals took a lunch break earlier than returning to the Sistine Chapel for Thursday’s afternoon voting session, the place two extra ballots have been doable.

Regardless of the frustration, hopes have been nonetheless excessive {that a} pope could be chosen shortly, maybe as early as Thursday afternoon’s fourth or fifth poll.

“I hope by this evening, returning to Rome, I’ll find white smoke,” stated Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, the 91-year-old dean of the Faculty of Cardinals who presided over the Mass earlier than the conclave. Re is just not collaborating within the balloting as a result of solely cardinals beneath 80 are eligible to solid votes.

Re, who was quoted by Italian media as talking Thursday in Pompeii, stated he was sure the 133 cardinals would elect “the pope that the church and world need today.”

For most people, the rhythm of the voting is dictated in some ways by the Vatican tv cameras: a smoke sign is close to when the cameras resume their fastened shot on the Sistine Chapel’s skinny chimney, with white smoke indicating a winner, and black which means no consensus.

On Thursday, massive college teams joined the combination of humanity awaiting the result in St. Peter’s Sq.. They blended in with individuals collaborating in pre-planned Holy 12 months pilgrimages and journalists from around the globe who’ve descended on Rome to doc the election.

“The wait is marvelous!” stated Priscilla Parlante, a Roman.

“We are hoping for the white smoke tonight,” stated Pedro Deget, 22, a finance scholar from Argentina. He stated he and his household visited Rome throughout the Argentine pope’s hold forth and have been hoping for a brand new pope in Francis’ picture.

“Francis did well in opening the church to the outside world, but on other fronts maybe he didn’t do enough. We’ll see if the next one will be able to do more,” Deget stated from the piazza.

The Rev. Jan Dominik Bogataj, a Slovene Franciscan friar, was extra vital of Francis. He stated if he have been within the Sistine Chapel, he’d be voting for Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem who’s on many papal contender lists.

“He has clear ideas, not much ideology. He’s a direct, intelligent, and respectful man,” Bogataj stated from the sq.. “Most of all, he’s agile.”

On Wednesday evening, the billowing black smoke of the primary poll poured out of the chapel chimney simply after 9 p.m., about 4.5 hours after the cardinals filed into the Sistine Chapel to take their oaths at the beginning of the conclave. The late hour prompted hypothesis about what took so lengthy: Did they need to redo the vote? Did somebody get sick or want translation assist? Did the papal preacher take a very long time to ship his meditation earlier than the voting started?

“They probably need more time,” stated Costanza Ranaldi, a 63-year-old who travelled from Pescara in Italy’s Abruzzo area to the Vatican.

A few of the cardinals had stated they anticipated a brief conclave. But when current historical past is any information, it’ll probably take a number of rounds of voting to choose the 267th pope.

For a lot of the previous century, the conclave has wanted between three and 14 ballots to discover a pope. John Paul I — the pope who reigned for 33 days in 1978 — was elected on the fourth poll. His successor, John Paul II, wanted eight. Francis was elected on the fifth in 2013.

The cardinals opened the secretive, centuries-old ritual Wednesday afternoon, collaborating in a ceremony extra theatrical than even Hollywood might create. Vivid purple cassocks, Swiss Guards standing at consideration, historic Latin chants and oaths preceded the slamming shut of the Sistine Chapel doorways to seal the cardinals off from the surface world.

Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the 70-year-old secretary of state beneath Francis and a main contender to succeed him as pope, assumed management of the proceedings as probably the most senior cardinal beneath age 80 eligible to take part.

Parolin appeared to have acquired the blessings from none aside from Re, the revered elder among the many cardinals. In the course of the conventional change of peace throughout the pre-conclave Mass on Wednesday, Re was caught on a scorching mic telling Parolin “Auguri doppio” or “double best wishes.” Italians debated whether or not it was only a customary gesture acknowledging Parolin’s position operating conclave, or if it might need been a casual endorsement or perhaps a untimely congratulations.

The voting follows a strict choreography, dictated by church regulation.

Every cardinal writes his selection on a bit of paper inscribed with the phrases “Eligo in summen pontificem” — “I elect as Supreme Pontiff.” They method the altar one after the other and say: “I call as my witness, Christ the Lord who will be my judge, that my vote is given to the one who, before God, I think should be elected.”

The folded poll is positioned on a spherical plate and tipped right into a silver and gold urn. As soon as solid, the ballots are opened one after the other by three completely different “scrutineers,” cardinals chosen at random who write down the names and browse them aloud.

The scrutineers, whose work is checked by different cardinals known as revisors, then add up the outcomes of every spherical of balloting and write it down on a separate sheet of paper, which is preserved within the papal archives.

Because the scrutineer reads out every identify, he pierces every poll with a needle via the phrase “Eligo.” All of the ballots are then certain along with thread, and the bundle is put apart and burned within the chapel range together with a chemical to provide the smoke.

Giada Zampano, Helena Alves and Vanessa Gera contributed to this report.

Related Press faith protection receives help via the AP’s collaboration with The Dialog US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely accountable for this content material.