The Healey administration stays a staunch opponent of pure gasoline as a new ballot signifies Bay Staters want the power supply over renewables, and because the feds intention to revive a pipeline challenge that might decrease utility prices by $1 billion.
Gov. Maura Healey, a champion of renewable power, particularly wind, has felt strain over the previous few months as utility prices soared attributable to a mixture of a bitterly chilly winter and the state’s decarbonization agenda.
The governor has responded, rolling out a plan she’s stated will ultimately reduce billions from taxpayer payments and ordering the state DPU to demand utility firms cut back prices by a minimum of 5% for the rest of the heating season.
The Division of Public Utilities authorized fee hikes of upwards of 30% for the state’s major gasoline firms, Eversource and Pure Grid, final fall.
As Bay Staters grapple with the sky-high payments, a brand new ballot from nonpartisan watchdog Fiscal Alliance Basis reveals that probably voters view an enlargement of pure gasoline pipelines extra favorably than a full dedication to renewables.
Roughly 47% of the 800 probably voters who participated within the ballot earlier this month supported the development of recent pipelines into the state, whereas 37% most popular a whole push to renewables.
Of the respondents, 48.2% have been Impartial, 40.6% Democrat and 11.1% Republican.
Healey critics have blamed the state Legislature’s mandate that the Bay State transition to renewable power for the winter’s excessive utility prices, accusing the governor of “killing” two gasoline pipeline tasks as legal professional basic throughout the previous decade.
“Obviously, Gov. Healey as AG worked really hard to stop the pipelines — she bragged about it on the campaign trail,” Fiscal Alliance Govt Director Paul Diego Craney stated in a briefing on Friday. “It seems like that’s kind of coming back to haunt her.”
After asserting that her administration will ship a $50 utility invoice credit score in April to clients of Eversource, Nationwide Grid, and Unitil, Healey stated that “people say a lot of things that are just not true” about her actions round pipeline growth.
“Back when I was attorney general my job was to protect ratepayers whether you’re a homeowner or a business owner,” Healey stated at an occasion final Monday.
A examine that Healey’s workplace approved in 2015 discovered that Massachusetts didn’t want a brand new pure gasoline pipeline as investing extra in power effectivity would guarantee the electrical grid’s reliability via 2030. Months later, power large Kinder Morgan Inc. backed out of a $3.3 billion pure gasoline pipeline proposed via Massachusetts and southern New Hampshire.
The plan Healey introduced final week additionally orders the DPU to increase automated discounted fee enrollment for low-income households and implement tiered discounted charges, amongst different duties.
In accordance with the governor, her plan will save ratepayers $220 million instantly and $5.8 billion over 5 years.
Power and Environmental Affairs Secretary Rebecca Tepper highlighted how Massachusetts offers a “significant amount of natural gas to the entire region” via a ship at a liquefied pure gasoline facility in Everett.
“The issue that we have in New England is that for a few days of the year, prices are high maybe seven days,” Tepper stated. “You don’t build a gigantic pipeline for seven days a year.”
Tepper’s remark has acquired sharp criticism on social media.
“There is no group of people more out of touch with reality than the individuals in the Healey-Driscoll Administration. Just a slap in the face to Massachusetts residents,” the Massachusetts GOP wrote in an X submit on Friday. “With your help, the gaslighting will stop in 2026!”
State Rep. Marc Lombardo, a Billerica Republican, added Saturday: “This is why energy prices are through the roof. (Gov.) Healey and her Energy secretary are completely detached from reality! They think YOU are stupid.”
In a press release to the Herald final month, a governor’s spokesperson highlighted how Healey as AG, “successfully argued that the people of Massachusetts should not be footing the bill for two new natural gas pipelines.”
“Once the companies learned that they were going to have to pay for the pipelines without passing the costs onto consumers, they withdrew their proposal,” the spokesperson stated.
Supply expenses spiking payments via the roof over the winter have been tied to elevated funding for state environmental initiatives together with Mass Save, a program that helps Massachusetts’ “statutorily-required greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals.”
The Trump administration is trying to revive a 124-mile pipeline that may carry gasoline from Pennsylvania throughout New York to Albany, the place pure gasoline would enter New England via different pipelines.
Opposition from environmental activists prompted the state of New York to dam the challenge in 2020. President Trump met with New York Gov. Kathy Hochul on Friday, discussing the pipeline’s future, in keeping with nationwide studies.
The Hartford Courant has reported that Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont is backing the challenge.
Trump posted on Reality Social forward of his assembly with Hochul that the pipeline might save New England households $2,500 to $5,000 a yr. An unbiased evaluation discovered that the challenge might reduce power prices by $1 billion.
Healey has voiced alarm over the Trump administration’s tariff spat with Canada and the way the president has ordered a memorandum halting the event of recent offshore wind, an power supply confirmed turbulent in Massachusetts.
“We have the Saudi Arabia of wind right off our shores,” Healey stated final week, “we have some of it churning already, we’ve got other projects in deployment. That’s going to be a game changer, that’s going to drive down people’s bills for businesses and homeowners.”
“I don’t want to be subject to the wills of Russia and international markets,” the governor added.
Initially Printed:
