A little bit of apocrypha that’s floated across the artwork world for the previous a number of years: when Artforum revealed one in every of Jack Whitten’s blazingly chromatic “slab” work on its cowl in 2012, an eminent historian of recent and up to date artwork allegedly needed to know: Who is that this second-rate Gerhard Richter? Like all gossip that sticks round, it struck a nerve on various ranges. The scholar was Richter’s nice champion, having made a profession of theorizing him as a type of “final” painter who went on portray lengthy after the medium had been deemed traditionally unviable—i.e., useless. His identification of Whitten as Richter’s epigone was an embarrassing mistake, for Pink Psyche Queen had been created in 1973, seven years earlier than the German artist started making his much-lauded squeegee work, which in pictures have a putting resemblance to Whitten’s slabs.
Thus a snide comment turns into a wry parable on the fallibility of artwork historians, at a second when their authority seems to be at its lowest ebb. But it surely additionally makes the bigger level that till very lately most individuals didn’t know Whitten’s work and had by no means even heard of him. This was all of the extra exceptional as a result of he had lived and labored in New York since 1960, was recognized and revered by nearly each summary painter there, had taught within the metropolis’s main artwork faculties and proven in its galleries, had exhibited his slab work on the Whitney Museum of American Artwork in 1974, and had had a ten-year survey on the Studio Museum in Harlem in 1983.
Regardless of the obvious similarities between Whitten’s slabs and Richter’s squeegees, they signify impartial options to the issue of how you can paint after Summary Expressionism and all it had come to represent in the course of the chilly warfare (which may hardly have meant the identical factor to the 2 artists). My suspicion is that these our bodies of labor may very well have little or no to do with one another. No matter is perhaps discovered from the comparability, nonetheless, one factor is definite: Whitten’s slabs don’t declare the exhaustion of portray or its historic stalemate however moderately represent a surging growth of its prospects.
Within the painting-saturated current, any try to clarify how devastatingly the “death of painting” rhetoric dominated the final quarter of the 20th century appears like a babbling conspiracy principle. But it surely actually occurred, and it reverberated in artwork faculties and magazines properly into the primary decade of this century. A sequence of revisionist exhibitions slowly started to shift that rhetoric by letting a brand new era see for itself portray’s persevering with vitality. There was the internationally touring present “High Times, Hard Times,” curated by the artwork historian Katy Siegel in 2006, which checked out experimental summary portray in Decrease Manhattan within the late Sixties to mid-Seventies, mainly by ladies and sexual and racial minorities who noticed the intertwined psychological and bodily processes of portray as a mode of liberation. These underappreciated artists, together with Whitten, Concord Hammond, David Diao, Howardena Pindell, and Dorothea Rockburne, have solely lately attracted the business and institutional consideration they deserve, and the present’s catalog has been a much-used handbook for artwork college students and sensible sellers alike.
Amongst this group, Whitten’s slabs stood out. Phrase bought round. He secured his first gallery illustration in years, Alexander Grey in Chelsea after which Zeno X in Belgium. A decent solo presentation of his work was shortly organized on the PS1 Up to date Artwork Heart in Queens in 2007, and he was more and more included in essential museum group reveals, similar to “Blues for Smoke” on the Museum of Up to date Artwork in Los Angeles in 2013. His first retrospective, “Five Decades of Painting,” was in 2014 on the Museum of Up to date Artwork San Diego. (It traveled, however to not New York.) Nonetheless, it took his becoming a member of the worldwide mega-gallery Hauser and Wirth for the tide to show definitively, which ought to be greeted with gratitude and a few skepticism in regards to the market as a bestower of “greatness.” Whitten’s first exhibition with the gallery in New York in 2017 contained new work that have been among the many strongest he’d ever made; they’d a shimmering grandeur that dispelled any whiff of cynicism round his blue-chip “rediscovery” as a uncared for grasp. On this case all of the PR hype had the advantage of being true. However the second of triumph was bittersweet: by then he was ailing, and he died lower than a 12 months later, in January 2018, on the age of seventy-eight.
Within the aftermath of his loss of life the artwork world equipment kicked into overdrive, with a pair of the marquee museum reveals that had eluded him for therefore lengthy. “Odyssey: Jack Whitten Sculpture, 1963–2017,” opened on the Baltimore Museum of Artwork and traveled to the Met Breuer in 2018; 4 years later “Jack Whitten: The Greek Alphabet Paintings” opened at Dia Beacon. A big quantity of his unpublished writings edited by Siegel, Notes from the Woodshed (2018), turned ubiquitous in artists’ studios; it was quickly joined by Jack Whitten: Cosmic Soul (2022), a scholarly monograph by the artwork historian Richard Shiff. And now, lastly, the Museum of Trendy Artwork has mounted “Jack Whitten: The Messenger,” a retrospective of work, sculptures, and drawings curated by Michelle Kuo that permits the artist to be seen in full for the primary time.
Whitten was born in Bessemer, Alabama, simply exterior of Birmingham, in 1939, to Annie Bell, a seamstress, and Mose Witten, a coal miner, below what he known as “American apartheid”: whole segregation enforced by ever-present racial violence. Mose died when Jack was 5, leaving Annie with seven kids to boost on her personal. The household was industrious by necessity and musical by nature. Jack performed tenor sax in the highschool marching band and in a dance band referred to as the Dunbar Jazzettes. A instructor set him up with a job portray indicators for department shops promoting weekly gross sales. He made flyers and backdrops for varsity occasions and was commissioned by an activist to color a protest poster depicting a black man sure in chains, for which he was paid fifty cents.
It was a coup when he was accepted on a piece scholarship to the Tuskegee Institute, the place he joined the ROTC and was a pre-med scholar on observe to grow to be an air power physician. That profession path abruptly resulted in his second 12 months, throughout a category heading in the right direction choice for bombing campaigns. He defined later that it was as if one thing touched him, in the way in which southern individuals describe a religious calling. In a daze he stood up and mentioned out loud, “What the fuck am I doing here?” In opposition to everybody’s strenuous objections he dropped out and transferred to Southern College in Baton Rouge to review artwork. He carefully adopted the civil rights motion—he had met Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. whereas he was nonetheless at Tuskegee—and co-organized a nonviolent protest. There he was confronted, he mentioned, with the face of true evil, as he endured all method of verbal and bodily assault. Traumatized, he threw every little thing he owned right into a lake and boarded a Greyhound bus to New York Metropolis.
Within the fall of 1960, at twenty, Whitten was admitted to the Cooper Union and located himself within the coronary heart of Bauhaus artwork and design pedagogy. He was the one Black artwork scholar in his class, and it was his first time in an built-in classroom, to not point out in shut proximity to white individuals with out having an instantaneous sense of menace. Robert Blackburn ran the printmaking workshop and swiftly introduced him to fulfill Romare Bearden, thereby introducing him to an earlier era of Black artists within the metropolis that included Jacob Lawrence and Norman Lewis, who turned early mentors and lifelong pals. However Whitten’s biggest creative inspirations have been the still-reigning New York Faculty painters, starting with Arshile Gorky. He noticed in Gorky, the Armenian immigrant who elevated his childhood recollections to the extent of fantasy via his personal hard-won summary language, a method ahead. He repaid this debt with Quantum Wall, VIII (For Arshile Gorky, My First Love in Portray) (2017; see illustration at proper), his final completed work, which was hanging on his studio wall on the time of his loss of life.
His entry into the multiracial bohemia of New York’s Decrease East Aspect threw his background into aid in sudden methods. He later characterised his artwork from the Sixties—similar to Birmingham 1964 (1964), a small mixed-media work wherein a newspaper {photograph} of a protester being attacked by a canine erupts via a bit of what appears like charred aluminum foil—as grappling with the issues of “identity.” On the identical time he produced various enigmatic darkish work wherein swells of pale paint had been pushed via a skinny fabric, producing what appear like summary pictures within the method of nineteenth-century spirit pictures, with names like Christ and Psychic Eclipse and a numbered sequence of “Heads” together with Head IV Lynching. These modest works are like glimpsing a visage in some dully reflective glass.
In an effort to know the geometrical construction of African artwork, Whitten requested his sculpture instructor, the Japanese American artist Leo Amino, to show him the rudiments of wooden carving. In the summertime of 1965 he produced two Jug Heads out of American elm blackened with shoe polish, which have been related to the wealthy Black American visible custom—folks and outsider arts—of his childhood. By the tip of the last decade, for his first solo present at Allan Stone Gallery in 1969, he was making vivid, fluent, all-over abstractions, together with Backyard in Bessemer VI (1968), a private recollection in homage to Gorky’s Backyard in Sochi, and a sequence of memorial work titled Martin Luther King’s Backyard, wherein faces and different imagery flicker inside calligraphic overlays.
Whitten was working within the studio and studying philosophy with fevered depth, whereas selecting up gigs as a cabinetmaker to help himself and shouldering the monetary and emotional duties of his marriage to Florence Squires, which fell aside just a few years after their daughter, Keita, was born. He later summed up his expertise of the Sixties:
Carl Jung, Freud, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Hegel, Husserl, Joseph Campbell, Japanese philosophy, Zen, Black Nationalism, Vietnam, city riots, political assassinations, medication, intercourse, household, racism, and portray all contributed to an enormous private meltdown in 1968.
In response he noticed a psychiatrist, began learning karate and Hatha yoga, and have become, for a time, a vegetarian. He additionally married Mary Staikos, a classmate from Cooper and an artist who turned a number one paper conservator. Their daughter, Mirsini, was born in 1972, and the couple remained collectively for 50 years.
Staikos, a first-generation Greek American, had by no means visited her ancestral residence within the Peloponnese; they deliberate a visit for the summer time of 1969. Two days earlier than leaving Whitten had a dream of a useless tree nonetheless rooted within the floor like Odysseus’s bedpost: he was to seek out this tree and carve it. Scouting round for the most affordable potential lodging, the couple in the end ended up in southern Crete, and within the middle of the small village of Agia Galini he noticed the tree, identical to within the dream. He quickly discovered the person who owned it and obtained permission to carve. Amid the great thing about the Mediterranean, having fun with octopus and raki, Whitten skilled an absence of the racism he’d recognized his total life. By the tip of that summer time the couple had grow to be native celebrities and have been accepted by the village like household. This inaugurated a cycle—summers on Crete, the place he carved, gardened, and fished, then a return to New York Metropolis to color, write, and train—that they repeated for the remainder of their lives.
Since he’d first arrived in New York, Whitten had haunted town’s nightclubs in pursuit of jazz, which Mary recalled as “the background music” of their lives. He heard Thelonious Monk, Ornette Coleman, and Miles Davis on the previous 5 Spot and was pals with Cecil Taylor, Albert Ayler, and Pharoah Sanders, amongst different musicians. Whitten had bought his personal tenor sax by 1963, deciding as an alternative to embody in visible type his understanding of jazz’s musical construction—one in every of high-driving abstraction that opens into nearly unfathomable freedom. One second that reverberated for him for many years was a dialog with John Coltrane, who described his compositions as a “wave.” Whitten translated these “sheets of sound” into Mild Sheet I (1969), a big unstretched canvas wherein monumental silk-screened gestures create diaphanous veils of yellow, pink, purple, and grey over nested squares.
At the moment New York’s reigning god of portray, Willem de Kooning, in his sixties and on the top of his energy, was producing a physique of labor that mixed muscular motion and aching sensitivity in agile yellows, pinks, grays, and blues. With out seeming to check with something however paint itself, he might conjure the transitory results of the panorama, of daylight on water or sand, of residing our bodies and sensate flesh, or the palette and contours of Raphael or Titian—not simply the look however the really feel of them—results that adamantly remained simply paint on a flat floor. Whatever the labor concerned, de Kooning needed these works to look effortlessly quick, like “a wind blowing across the surface.” They continue to be to at the present time the very best achievement in gestural summary portray.
The lyrical hand of Whitten’s Sixties work betrays de Kooning’s heavy affect, which he turned more and more determined to flee: “As I learned more about painting, [de Kooning’s] signature gesture in painting not only attracted me but I became obsessively entwined in his method. I struggled to wean myself from hero worship.” Getting back from Crete refreshed, Whitten got down to strategy the canvas with different instruments he had readily available: an Afro decide and a carpenter’s noticed, with which he raked the floor to create patterns. These new works bore titles like Homage to Malcolm (1970), a big darkish triangle radiating out from or receding again into two smaller triangles on the middle, with subdued flashes of reds, greens, and blues enacting a black iridescence.
De Kooning’s marks have been huge, so Whitten must discover a option to make them larger; de Kooning’s work have been quick, so he’d have to determine how you can make them quicker. His resolution was ingenious. In his studio on Broome Avenue he constructed a wonderfully degree fourteen-by-twenty-four-foot platform so he might work horizontally like Jackson Pollock, attaching unstretched canvas to it after which exactly controlling the circulate and course of poured paint. He constructed a sequence of enormous squeegee gadgets that he referred to as “developers,” vast sufficient to pull throughout the whole floor with one go. By including weights and altering their blades, he might have full management. Experimenting with the proportions of gel mediums, pigments, and chemical components to hurry up or decelerate drying, he would construct layers of colour. Then, in a single movement, he’d pull the developer throughout the portray, making horizontal streaks that ripped open pockets of colour, with the layers of pigment suspended in various densities of translucent plastic. This swift motion concerned his total physique and required Zen-like focus, nearly literalizing de Kooning’s “wind” to provide the image.
This wasn’t a rejection or a critique of de Kooning however an astonishing invention impressed by the problem he posed. Whitten’s accelerated sense of pace and simultaneity, mixed along with his matter-of-fact mechanisms and custom-made supplies, solely deepens the thriller, as a result of the longer a viewer appears, the more durable it turns into to know precisely how any given impact is achieved. (Typically he even handed over the uneven surfaces with a razor-sharp carpenter’s airplane, additional revealing colours and concealing course of.) His relentless experimentation with supplies, together with working straight with producers to create his personal distinctive paints, paid off. Fifty years on, the surfaces stay immaculately recent.
As soon as dry, the canvas was stretched over a wood body and stapled on the again in order that the painted swipe appeared to embody the whole thing of the oblong object, beginning behind the wall, wrapping across the aspect and throughout the entrance, then disappearing once more, as if it have been only a momentary excerpt of a steady circulate. This side would have been extra salient on the time of those works’ inception, when there was main dialogue in regards to the relation of portray to sculpture. In response to this crucial consciousness of a portray as an object, the creation of what Whitten referred to as “slabs” was a novel method of carrying gestural portray ahead.
He started to position objects similar to wires and stones (what he termed “disruptors”) beneath the canvas, in order that when the developer was pulled, they created a shadowy indent, a visible stutter. The outcomes are a tightly calibrated marriage of composition and likelihood. This system allowed him to desert brushstrokes, which, for higher and worse, are conventionally learn as marks testifying to the presence of their particular writer, with all the private psychology that means; Whitten considered brushstrokes as relational, and that visually following them was tantamount to a disclosure of course of, one thing he needed to keep away from. His new technique allowed him to retain painterly contact with out the standard traces of the portray’s maker. Every slab, exceeding the scale of a person physique, creates a propulsive colour world and evokes the striations of geological time, the horizonless glitter of deep area, or the limitless expanse of the thoughts. Above all, these work communicate to a mystical location past the confines of a self.
Whitten’s slabs—similar to Delacroix’s Palette (1974; see illustration at high of article), wherein oranges and reds glow ember-like towards a matte, barely metallic, pewter-gray floor—have a depth that appears to carry the sunshine moderately than radiate or mirror it. Within the mid-Sixties an oracular phrase occurred to him, and he wrote it in his studio notes and copied it onto his studio wall: “The image is photographic; therefore, I must photograph my thoughts.” It appeared to talk to the instantaneous self-evidence of the swipe of the developer, to pictures as “writing with light,” to the photographic picture’s simple flatness that however opens into depth, and to the compression of time and area. All of those readings have been implicit within the slabs.
One other artist would have fortunately gone on making such works for the remainder of his life. Nonetheless, after solely a few years Whitten’s technique advanced once more: he drastically modified the looks and parameters of his work by limiting his colours to black and white, thereby opening up all of the ensuing grays. The racial shorthand was there, however so was his insistent rejection of the binary in favor of the complexities of blur. He made various densely variegated work that regarded more and more like technological photographs (X-rays, radar), experimented with Xerox course of and toner, and was fascinated by advances in physics and communications apparatuses. Utilizing his singular mix of extraordinarily viscous, translucent graphite paint, which he referred to as “slip” just like the watery clay utilized in ceramics, he raked overlapping grids wherein zones of subtly launched colours throbbed, alternating the notion of foreground and background. He determined that the grid itself was the DNA of visuality, which might mediate between materials actuality and the thoughts, the place notion resides.
Whitten’s early engagement with the “image” of summary portray in relation to pictures and different technical reproductions proved prophetic. He noticed abstraction as no much less a “sign” than any representational picture, going as far as to put in writing that it’s the equal of the “mask” in non-Western cultures; its perform is to embody concepts and talk visually throughout time. Portray can even resist the flattening results of pictures. Visible artwork is about notion, he wrote, and our notion is modified by our know-how in methods we most likely can’t absolutely comprehend; portray, nonetheless, can grapple with these adjustments, file and fight them, maintain the previous and the longer term in relation. Whitten’s perception that portray can present this important service to the world partly accounts for the inexplicable vitality and ubiquity of portray right now: we stay in a world dominated by photographs, digitally dematerialized and endlessly proliferating on screens. However in portray we encounter photographs as embodied issues; portray is a really previous know-how that we will use to work out our relationship with these photographs—one thing unattainable to do inside the infinitely flickering scroll.
Portray’s nice energy lies in the truth that it’s fabricated from matter; ideas and histories are embedded in it. But more and more Whitten understood this matter in relation to mild: how matter creates mild from colour, modulates it throughout surfaces, holds it in its depths. This seen mild, the essence of the visible itself, comes right here from distant stars, and so forth the face of the portray there’s a “weaving of light,” as he referred to as it, a gathering of close to and much. He was after a lightweight that “must define a space, not a pictorial space.” Via rigorous materials experimentation Whitten got here to consider that he might form these encounters, transferring past any earlier notion of abstraction or illustration, object or portray, actuality or phantasm. He started making molds of objects—a avenue grate, a stretch of sidewalk or mesh or cladding, the bottoms of bottles—then casting the impressions in acrylic paints. These relief-like parts, in works similar to Bessemer Dreamer (1986), are actually abstracted from life: they file specific moments of contact, with paint that has been formed by life then lower up and reassembled into artwork.
Whitten’s final nice breakthrough in 1990 harkened again to the slab. He realized that he might rework a slab into models that he referred to as “tesserae,” after the tiles of treasured stone or glass utilized in historical mosaics. He created them by constructing layered sheets of accrued acrylic paint that have been then hand-cut into irregular squares or rectangles and affixed to a canvas. As mild bounces throughout their undulating, translucent surfaces, these works, similar to Monk’s Kimono (For T.S.M.) (1990), appear to maneuver and shift with the viewer, as texture and element telescope into bigger visible patterns. Whitten’s modern varieties performed a dialog over hundreds of years, evoking Byzantine mosaics and the tiled polychrome of the Babylonian Ishtar Gate in addition to satellite tv for pc imagery and digital knowledge interfaces, creating a visible language with all of the formal complexity of jazz unfurling in time and area.
From the start Whitten’s work typically functioned as a memorial, however because it progressed this took on even better dimensions. A sequence of giant darkish work referred to as “Black Monoliths,” spanning the late Nineteen Eighties to his loss of life and devoted to African American luminaries—James Baldwin, Barbara Jordan, Maya Angelou, Jacob Lawrence—are all organized round a central type in nuanced shades of usually glittering black, shiny and matte. Different memorial work add one other notion of abstraction; they honor not solely pals and mentors who died but additionally strangers, such because the monumental 9.11.01 (2006), with which he claimed his personal style: summary historical past portray. In his final many years he made artwork that sought to grieve every little thing from the Center Passage to the capturing at Sandy Hook Elementary Faculty. Whitten believed that the up to date artist can handle what it means to be alive right now with such an superior and horrible inheritance, which should be embodied, concretized, whether it is to be confronted and adjusted.
This coincided along with his rising recognition of artwork’s religious and ritual perform. Taken in its broadest sense, the vast majority of what we name artwork world wide has been made in relation to a religious follow. By the Nineties, Whitten usually wrote in his studio logs that he was in search of to construct a spot for spirit to inhabit, and that when spirit entered the work, they have been accomplished:
ONE MUST LEARN TO RECOGNIZE THE PRESENCE OF SPIRIT AND TO ACKNOWLEDGE ITS’ PRESENCE. I ACKNOWLEDGE ITS’ PRESENCE BY CONSTRUCTING AN OBJECT WHICH ALLOWS OR INVITES THE SPIRIT TO REST. THIS IS MY JOB AS AN ARTIST. YOU CAN IDENTIFY THE PRESENCE OF SPRIIT WITHIN A SPECIFIC QUALITY OF LIGHT. THIS AND ONLY THIS IS THE ART OF PAINTING.
He wrestled with the character of that spirit. Was it ancestral, transmitted genetically, within the blood? Was it divine, transferring between individuals via tradition? Or was it, no much less mysteriously, a human spirit, the emanation of the viewer’s personal thoughts? Was it particularly Black—as in “soul”—or was it the spirit that sought communion past race, nationality, gender, and all types of “difference”?
He posed these inquiries to himself in his work and writing, after which, in an artist’s model of the scientific technique, he rigorously studied what he made for solutions, one portray at a time. As a result of his work is an excessive model of portray, little that’s essential about it may be communicated in reproductions. It insists on direct viewing. What seems to be brilliantly stressed innovation is revealed to be rigorous interrogation of what portray, and solely portray, can do. The chance to see this for ourselves, to check it towards our personal perceptions, makes the Museum of Trendy Artwork’s retrospective not solely one in every of its finest reveals in a decade however, if correctly attended to, one in every of its most consequential.
This impression will also be felt in Notes from the Woodshed, an essential up to date entry in a particular class of books that chart the inside lifetime of the visible artist’s studio. It’s a style narrowly learn however deeply liked, principally by different artists and by students. Maybe probably the most well-known instance is the journals of Eugène Delacroix, a touchstone for the New York Faculty artist Robert Motherwell, who noticed:
Delacroix’s alert and cultivated thoughts continuously rolling, like an ever-changing tide, over the rocky questions of l’artwork trendye…remained a sustaining ethical power in my inside life, as I believe it might have within the lives of many artists who, in my expertise, are largely preoccupied, when not making artwork, with interested by what it is.
This sentiment summarizes the impact of Whitten’s collected studio writing, by the artist who proclaimed “I am the heir to Delacroix” on his studio wall and in his studio log. Written for himself, this file was unknown even to his closest pals. (So have been his sculptures, stored non-public in Crete for nearly fifty years, though he maintained that they’d the largest affect on his pondering as a painter.) Towards the tip of his life Katy Siegel satisfied him of his writing’s significance and labored with him to arrange it for publication. In these pages Whitten wrestles with the issues of abstraction, the character of sunshine, the symbolism of colour, and his place in artwork historical past as he tried to fuse historical archaeological websites, African sculpture, and Western summary portray whereas giving up nothing.
He was not in any method conflicted about his Blackness or the significance of his worldview as a Black artist, and he was painfully conscious of the racism that prevented his work from getting the institutional consideration and help it deserved, shutting him out of the art-historical file. On the identical time he challenged the instrumentalization of his id and resisted it via his insistence on abstraction. He was additionally crucial of the methods wherein sure strains of Black artwork have been gaining business and institutional acceptance, writing in 2006, “I have no interest in the autobiographical identity issue bullshit, especially from Black artist. The shit is boring!… Please do not show me anything that doesn’t go beyond the self!” For him the politics of Blackness have been infused into his creative varieties and course of—as he wrote barely later, “My identity is compressed into paint as matter”—undeniably current and but unillustrated, a unifying cosmic imaginative and prescient firmly inside the Black radical custom.
Whitten’s ambition as an summary painter and his overriding spirituality proceed to problem the discourses of latest artwork. The ultimate entry of his log, from December 27, 2017, lower than a month earlier than he died, ends:
Artwork is the one religious type that we will rely upon. When politics goes amok, when organized religions grow to be political…we will all the time rely upon artwork to drag us via. We should make certain the humanities will survive for the advantage of all. Assist the humanities with none types of restrictions. Artwork is what artist do. And we’re the canaries within the coal mines. So all the artists on the market, hold sniffing the air for warning indicators of any pollution…. ART IS OUR COMPASS TO THE COSMOS.