A listening to started Monday for a Massachusetts decide dealing with civil costs over allegations that she allowed an unlawful immigrant in her court docket evade a ready immigration enforcement agent.
The case stems from a 2018 incident through which Shelley Joseph, a district court docket decide, is accused of colluding with the immigrant’s legal professional and a court docket officer to permit him escape out a again door of the courthouse after a listening to on costs that included drug possession. An Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer had been ready outdoors the courtroom to detain the defendant, Jose Medina-Perez.
“This case is about the integrity, impartiality and independence of the Massachusetts judiciary and the appearance of the integrity, impartiality and independence every judge must uphold,” Judith Fabricant, particular counsel for the fee, instructed the listening to.
A lawyer for Joseph, Elizabeth Mulvey, mentioned the case had been distorted over time and that everybody had come to imagine that her consumer “let an illegal immigrant out of the door” with half of these folks believing she needs to be jailed and the opposite half calling her a “folk hero.”
She argued Joseph had been vilified within the media and folks had been giving the impression that “dozens of people” had seen Joseph “get off the bench, escort the defendant to the door, give him a hug and wish him god speed.”
“Today in this court room and we are going to have opportunity to hear all the evidence,” Mulvey mentioned.
The case is much like a Milwaukee decide accused in April of serving to a person evade immigration authorities. The case has escalated a conflict between the Trump administration and native authorities over the Republican president’s sweeping immigration crackdown.
Milwaukee County Circuit Court docket Choose Hannah Dugan is accused of escorting the person and his lawyer out of her courtroom by way of the jury door after studying that immigration authorities had been looking for his arrest. The person was taken into custody outdoors the courthouse after brokers chased him on foot.
Within the Massachusetts case, federal obstruction of justice costs in opposition to Joseph had been dropped in 2022 after she agreed to refer herself to a state company that investigates allegations of misconduct by members of the bench. That company, the Fee on Judicial Conduct, concluded final 12 months that Joseph “engaged in willful judicial misconduct that brought the judicial office into disrepute, as well as conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and unbecoming a judicial officer.”
Denis McInerney, the listening to officer assigned to the case by the Supreme Judicial Court docket, mentioned he’ll hear the proof after which make a advice afterward based mostly on whether or not he finds Joseph violated the Massachusetts Code of Judicial Conduct. The listening to is predicted to final a couple of week.
A lot of the primary day was dominated by the primary witness, lawyer David Jellinek, who instructed the court docket he had been employed that day to signify Medina-Perez and had been granted immunity by federal prosecutors. Together with the drug costs, Medina-Perez was in court docket on a warrant out of Pennsylvania.
After doing a little analysis, Jellinek believed his consumer wasn’t the identical particular person wished on the warrant. “I was worried they were going to take a US citizen into custody,” he instructed the court docket. “I was quite concerned for my client.”
Jellinek didn’t persuade the ICE agent that that they had the “wrong guy” so he got here up with a plan to launch Medina-Perez out the again door.
Jellinek testified Monday that he requested if he and the ADA on the case may have a “sidebar” dialog with the decide. A transcript of that sidebar is available in two components, with a 52-second “off the record” dialog occurring within the center.
Jellinek mentioned that in that off-the-record second, he defined to the decide that he hoped to get his consumer out of the courthouse with out encountering ICE. He knew there was a door utilized by court docket officers to simply accept legal defendants, and in accordance with his testimony he instructed the decide he would use that again door, together with her permission.
Fabricant argued that Joseph signaled her approval for the plan – together with within the off the file dialog in the course of the aspect bar — when she appeared sympathetic to Jellinek’s need for his consumer to keep away from ICE.
However one other legal professional for Joseph, Thomas Hoopes, recommended that Jellinek may need misinterpreted Joseph’s feedback when she raised the chance that Medina-Perez may very well be detained, moderately than be launched.
The prosecutor had agreed Medina-Perez wasn’t the person wished in Pennsylvania and moved to drop the fugitive from justice cost. She additionally wasn’t looking for bail on the drug costs so he was free to go.
A lot will hinge on what was mentioned throughout that off the file dialog, which lasted solely 52 seconds and is being disputed by either side.
Joseph’s listening to was adjourned for the day after Jellinek’s testimony, however will proceed on Tuesday at 10 a.m.
Initially Printed:
