Massachusetts city employee fined $10,000 for utilizing public sources to switch fence on his property

Date:

The State Ethics Fee wasn’t on the fence about this punishment.

A foreman of a city’s upkeep division has paid a $10,000 superb to the Bay State after he used city sources to switch a fence on his property.

Christopher Vincent, foreman of Carver’s operations and upkeep (O&M) division, paid the $10,000 civil penalty for violating the battle of curiosity regulation, in line with the Massachusetts Ethics Fee.

“When public employees misuse public resources to benefit themselves, they cheat the public and erode its confidence in the integrity of public service,” stated State Ethics Fee Govt Director David Wilson.

“Town-owned resources, such as materials, vehicles, and public employee worktime, are to be used for public purposes, not private benefit,” Wilson added.

Two years in the past, Vincent really useful to his direct supervisor — the O&M deputy director — that O&M exchange a fence product of wood phone poles on Vincent’s property. His property subsequent to a cranberry bathroom has an assessed worth of $768,900, in line with the city assessor’s on-line database.

The O&M deputy director agreed to Vincent’s request, after which Vincent directed two of the division’s staff to exchange the fence utilizing new pressure-treated wooden.

Final January, the O&M workers eliminated the previous fence and put in the brand new fence throughout their public worktime — utilizing greater than $500 value of city supplies, which they transported to Vincent’s property in a town-owned truck.

The fence work took the 2 workers 1.5 public workdays. Primarily based on their salaries, the mixed worth of the 2 workers’ city work time was about $573.

Share post:

Subscribe

Latest Article's

More like this
Related

Trump border czar defends ICE arrests in colleges, church buildings

Following the primary wave of deportations underneath the Trump...

Taunton man discovered responsible of raping co-worker in 2018 drugged drink case

A 50-year-man was sentenced to six to 10 years...