Rep. Clay Higgins (R-La.) was the one “no” vote amidst 427 “yes” votes on a invoice that might drive the Justice Division to publicly launch its information on the deceased baby intercourse predator.
Contemplating the overwhelming assist given to the invoice, folks naturally had ideas why Higgins determined to be the contrarian.
Higgins started by saying he’s been “a principled ‘NO’ on this bill from the beginning,” and that “what was wrong with the bill three months ago is still wrong today.”
In response to the congressman, the invoice “abandons 250 years of criminal justice procedure in America,” and “reveals and injures thousands of innocent people – witnesses, people who provided alibis, family members, etc.”
Higgins claimed that “if enacted in its current form, this type of broad reveal of criminal investigative files, released to a rabid media, will absolutely result in innocent people being hurt.”
Nonetheless, Higgins stated that the Senate “amends the bill to properly address privacy of victims and other Americans, who are named but not criminally implicated, then I will vote for that bill when it comes back to the House.”
Though some folks did agree with Higgins’ reasoning for the no vote, the overwhelming majority of individuals thought he was simply attempting to guard folks in energy from being held accountable.
After all, one particular person trolled Higgins by questioning if he had an ulterior motive for voting no.
Be a part of OurMission: HelpImpartial Information
Your HelpFuelsOur Mission
Your HelpFuelsOur Mission
