Think about watching Cloverfield and 10 Cloverfield Lane, considering, “Wow, what an interesting anthology of terrifying, mysterious scenarios wrapped in a neat little multiverse mystery box.” Now think about getting The Cloverfield Paradox, a movie that seems like that thriller field was dropped, kicked into area, and exploded in a microwave crammed with unhealthy concepts. Welcome to probably the most baffling entry in a once-promising franchise: The Cloverfield Paradox—a film so shocking it was introduced, marketed, and launched inside the span of a single Tremendous Bowl evening in 2018. And never as a result of it was too good to attend, however extra like they didn’t need you considering too exhausting about it earlier than you watched. That is the messy, overcooked lasagna of the Cloverfield universe. Immediately, on Horror Revisited, we’re diving headfirst into its complicated creation, Netflix dumping, dimensional weirdness, and why even proficient actors can’t save a script that performs prefer it was generated by a particle accelerator gone flawed.
The origins of The Cloverfield Paradox could be traced again to a totally unrelated movie known as God Particle. Written by Oren Uziel round 2012, it was a sci-fi thriller set aboard an area station the place a particle accelerator experiment causes Earth to fade. The pitch was compelling and recent: a closed-setting thriller within the stars, filled with paranoia, scientific horror, and existential dread. Produced by Paramount and J.J. Abrams’ Dangerous Robotic Productions, God Particle was in step with Dangerous Robotic’s love for mysterious, twisty style movies. Nonetheless, it wasn’t till manufacturing that somebody someplace mentioned, “Wait… what if this was a Cloverfield movie?” Reasonably than construct the Cloverfield mythology organically, they retrofitted God Particle into the third entry of the anthology. This late-stage Clover-fication of the mission was largely a strategic transfer. After the shock success of 10 Cloverfield Lane, which began life as a standalone script a.okay.a. The Cellar, Abrams and group realized there was worth in taking accomplished or nearly-complete movies and branding them with the Cloverfield title to assist launch a free shared universe. However whereas 10 Cloverfield Lane benefitted from its minimal connections and powerful storytelling, Paradox took the alternative route: a sledgehammer strategy to lore that solely raised extra questions than solutions.
Julius Onah, a comparatively unknown director on the time, was introduced in to helm the newly-titled The Cloverfield Paradox. The movie stars a wildly proficient solid: Gugu Mbatha-Uncooked, David Oyelowo, Daniel Brühl, Chris O’Dowd, Zhang Ziyi, Elizabeth Debicki, and John Ortiz. That’s a killer lineup. And but someway, this ensemble finally ends up feeling like a Star Trek solid caught in an HR coaching simulation. Or perhaps it’s just like the USS Callister from Black Mirror… you’ll be able to resolve. The movie takes place largely aboard the Cloverfield area station, see what they did there, the place a multinational crew is tasked with fixing Earth’s vitality disaster utilizing an enormous particle accelerator known as the Shepard. However after they lastly hearth it up, it causes the Earth to seemingly disappear, actuality to bend, and logic to fully exit the script. Worms seem inside folks. A girl is discovered inside a wall. Chris O’Dowd’s arm is severed and begins writing notes by itself. At one level, a personality vomits up worms prefer it’s an episode of Worry Issue: Quantum Version. There’s no inner logic. It’s only a sequence of “wouldn’t it be weird if?” moments strung collectively by high-concept babble.
So what is the plot? Basically, the Shepard experiment flings the crew into an alternate dimension the place a unique model of the station exists, and chaos ensues. However the film by no means actually defines its guidelines. As an alternative, we get obscure solutions that the particle accelerator “tore open reality” and allowed monsters, time shifts, and paradoxes to circulation via. On Earth, we sometimes minimize to Gugu Mbatha-Uncooked’s character’s husband working round a ruined metropolis that will or will not be underneath assault from a Cloverfield-style monster. These scenes really feel like they had been shot last-minute to remind you, “Hey, this is still a Cloverfield movie!” Besides it feels extra like a ghost of the franchise haunting a very unrelated movie. It’s at this level we truly miss following round Rob, Hud, Marlena and Lily within the first movie. We’d truly take the shaky cam pictures if that helps so as to add some enjoyable! The connections to the earlier movies are paper-thin. The monster that briefly reveals up on the finish? It appears vaguely just like the one from the primary film, however now it’s huge, towering above the clouds. There’s additionally some point out of a multiverse and dimensional rifts, which is supposed to tie collectively the wildly completely different tones of Cloverfield and 10 Cloverfield Lane. However as an alternative of deepening the mythology, it confuses it.
Right here’s the place issues get additional bizarre. In early 2018, with The Cloverfield Paradox affected by a troubled post-production and rumors swirling about poor take a look at screenings, Paramount made a daring transfer. Reasonably than launch the movie theatrically like the primary two entries, they offered the rights to Netflix. Reportedly, this deal helped Paramount recoup most of its funding immediately. Then, in some of the weird advertising and marketing stunts in movie historical past, a teaser trailer for The Cloverfield Paradox aired throughout Tremendous Bowl LII. On the finish of the teaser, Netflix dropped the bomb: the film can be obtainable to stream instantly after the sport. No buildup. No press screenings. Simply increase: right here it’s, go watch. In an period obsessive about spectacle and shock, this was a advertising and marketing transfer that demanded consideration. However because the mud settled and the film was truly watched, pleasure curdled into confusion, and awe become outrage. It labored like a attraction—for a short while. Twitter exploded. Articles had been written earlier than the credit had even rolled. Followers had been glued to their screens. For these few post-Tremendous Bowl hours, The Cloverfield Paradox grew to become a cultural second, a phenomenon that folks felt they had to observe, if solely to be a part of the shared expertise. In a way, everybody concerned bought what they needed: buzz, headlines, and a focus. After which… folks truly watched the film.
The Cloverfield Paradox was, by most accounts, a messy, undercooked sci-fi pastiche—much less a story growth and extra a set of half-baked concepts duct-taped collectively in orbit. The shock drop, which had felt so thrilling simply hours earlier, now appeared like a bait-and-switch. Audiences who thought they had been getting a fastidiously constructed new chapter within the Cloverfield saga as an alternative bought a repurposed sci-fi script hat had been retrofitted with Cloverfield components late in manufacturing. Critics and audiences alike had been baffled. The movie presently sits at a lowly 21% on Rotten Tomatoes. Most opinions echoed the identical sentiment: nice solid, intriguing setup, however wasted potential and nonsensical plotting. Even followers of the franchise had been left scratching their heads. Worse but, the transfer harm the model. Cloverfield had been constructed on thriller, sure, but in addition on high quality. Each earlier entries—no matter style—had felt creative and daring. The Cloverfield Paradox, in contrast, felt low-cost. Lazy. Tacked-on. The belief that had been constructed between the filmmakers and the followers cracked underneath the burden of unmet expectations.
What stung probably the most was how aggressively Paradox tried to over-explain the Cloverfield mythology. The place the primary two movies succeeded due to ambiguity, thriller, and suggestion, Paradox tried to outline every part in a single breath: monsters, aliens, vitality crises, multiverses, time loops—it’s all right here, and none of it lands. The issue isn’t that the movie asks large sci-fi questions. It’s that it fails to provide these questions emotional or thematic weight. Every part feels thrown in, not constructed up. It’s as if the filmmakers had been attempting to duct tape a cinematic universe collectively in actual time.
Let’s be clear: this solid deserved higher. Gugu Mbatha-Uncooked tries her absolute hardest to inject humanity right into a paper-thin character arc involving the loss of life of her kids in her house dimension. David Oyelowo brings gravitas to a nothing position. Daniel Brühl, normally magnetic, is given zero to do. Chris O’Dowd is supposed to be comedian reduction, however even his attraction can’t salvage the script’s confused tone. Elizabeth Debicki, who reveals up midway via the film as a model of a crew member from one other dimension, does her greatest with what she’s given, however once more, it’s like watching nice musicians attempt to play a symphony written in crayon.
The largest difficulty with The Cloverfield Paradox is that it tries to do an excessive amount of with out incomes any of it. The try and hyperlink it to the broader Cloverfield universe smothers what might have been a neat little sci-fi thriller. Had it remained God Particle, with a tighter script and a extra targeted narrative, it might need stood by itself. If the movie had embraced its cosmic horror potential—suppose Occasion Horizon meets The Factor, with just a little little bit of Sunshine on high and targeted much less on compelled franchise connections, it might have carved a brand new id inside the style. As an alternative, it grew to become the awkward center baby of a sequence looking for its goal.
Okay, okay, it’s not all unhealthy. The manufacturing design is first rate. The area station appears cool. Among the horror moments—just like the arm sequence and the inexplicable wall-woman—are eerie and intriguing, even when they don’t make sense. And the thought of exploring the Cloverfield universe via alternate dimensions remains to be attention-grabbing. There’s a superb film buried in right here someplace, perhaps even a fantastic one. It simply wanted a greater script, extra readability, and rather less studio meddling and extra shaky cam… all the time extra shaky cam!
After Paradox, the Cloverfield title took successful. For some time, followers weren’t positive if the sequence would proceed. However Abrams has since hinted {that a} “true” theatrical sequel to the unique Cloverfield is in improvement—one which follows via on the story as an alternative of dancing round it.
If something, this movie is a cautionary story. Slapping a model title on a film doesn’t assure success. You continue to want story, imaginative and prescient, and, you recognize, a plot that is smart. You must also attempt to launch your movie into theaters and never dump it proper to streaming. Give the film an opportunity to breath and join with audiences. Who is aware of? Possibly it could have performed as a greater expertise. Possibly folks would have been immersed within the claustrophobic setting, as an alternative of having the ability to half watch at house, cosy on their sofa whereas scrolling via social media and half being attentive to it.
Ultimately, The Cloverfield Paradox isn’t the worst film ever made, nevertheless it is likely to be some of the disappointing. It took a promising thought, a unbelievable solid, and an thrilling franchise and diluted them into one thing bloated and directionless. It tried to reply questions that didn’t want solutions and ended up creating extra confusion than cohesion. In comparison with the uncooked depth of Cloverfield and the tense claustrophobia of 10 Cloverfield Lane, this movie seems like an overcomplicated footnote. Nonetheless, it’s price revisiting as a lesson in franchise filmmaking. Not each story must be linked. Generally, a standalone story with a transparent starting, center, and finish is extra highly effective than a tangled internet of explanations.
The Cloverfield Paradox is the cinematic equal of waking up after a wild evening and realizing somebody put Cloverfield stickers throughout a very completely different film. And now all of us simply kinda nod politely and faux it belongs within the household picture.
Thanks for watching Horror Revisited. When you loved this dive into quantum disappointment, please keep in mind: by no means combine particle accelerators and franchise branding. It tears holes within the universe—and in your viewers’s belief.
Two earlier episodes of Revisited could be seen under. To see extra of our reveals, head over to the JoBlo Horror Originals channel – and subscribe when you’re at it!
