This text consists of materials from HuffPost’s weekly tradition and leisure e-newsletter, The Tradition Catchall. Click on right here to subscribe.
Movie star self-portrait documentaries have at all times been a puzzling subgenre that tends to supply greater than it may well truly ship in relation to real shows of humanization. Whereas most purport to be revealing and candid reflections of a well-known topic, they typically quantity to disjointed items of a narrative, from which we by no means get a full sense, a minimum of not an goal one.
Such is the case in “aka Charlie Sheen,” Netflix’s exhausting two-part documentary directed by Andrew Renzi, which sees the previous “Two and a Half Men” star open up about his ugly public truths — his drug habit, wild life-style, the general public spectacles, his disastrous fall from TV grace — and others he’s but to talk on till now.
The movie, cut up into two 90-minute elements, is crammed with unflinching revelations about Sheen’s colourful previous that began making headlines earlier than it even premiered on Sept. 10. Publications have already rounded up the juiciest and most salacious tidbits revealed as a result of they know that’s precisely what persons are tuning in for.
It’s comprehensible why the documentary is presently the No. 1 film on Netflix. That’s simply the world we dwell in now. The metric isn’t a measure of how nicely put collectively “aka Charlie Sheen” truly is, however reasonably what piques audiences’ curiosity as of late, which, in Sheen’s case, occurs to be the darkest points of his life and profession that he’s nonetheless dwelling within the shadow of.
However that’s only one problem along with his documentary. The opposite is what many movie star docs that function their topic typically endure from: the shortcoming to relinquish management.
Whereas Sheen isn’t credited as a producer on his movie, he seems to steer the narrative as if he have been one. A query Renzi poses on the high of Half 1 suggests so, as he curiously asks the actor, “How do you imagine structuring the story of Charlie Sheen?” To which the latter breaks it down into three neat sections: “Partying, partying with problems and then just problems.”
And that’s just about how the doc is organized, which says lots about what Renzi — and Sheen — need us to know concerning the actor at this level in his life, now eight years sober and on a path towards self-forgiveness, by his personal account.
To the director’s credit score, a number of figures in Sheen’s life communicate within the doc as nicely — together with his older brother, Ramon Estevez; his childhood pal, Sean Penn; former “Two and a Half Men” co-star Jon Cryer; his ex-wives Denise Richards and Brooke Mueller; and even Heidi Fleiss, the Hollywood madam that Sheen (considered one of her former purchasers) testified in opposition to in her 1995 federal cash laundering and tax evasion trial.
Richards makes it a degree to share why she agreed to sit down down for an interview, which is commendable to a level when you concentrate on the aim of the movie.
“I want to peel the layers and be honest because, otherwise, this movie is going to be a fluffy, glossed-over, sugar-coated piece of shit,” she says in Half 2.
And whereas “aka Charlie Sheen” is brutally trustworthy in some respects, the place seemingly no matter is off-limits, it nonetheless holds again when it shouldn’t.
Positive, there are poignant mentions of Sheen’s childhood — rising up along with his well-known father, Martin Sheen, and older brother, Emilio Estevez (each of whom declined to take part within the movie) — in addition to his battles with sobriety and fatherhood. There are even attention-grabbing tales concerning the actor’s skilled pursuits, just like the time he needed to flip down the lead half in “Karate Kid.”
Nevertheless, a lot of the doc’s lengthy three-hour runtime is spent revisiting essentially the most sensational elements of Sheen’s life — the intercourse, medicine, partying and crashouts — leaving little room for depth, and even much less for inspecting how Sheen, regardless of hitting all-time low a number of occasions, has nonetheless managed to stage a comeback (or as he calls it, a “reset”).
Different stars, significantly those that aren’t white males from profitable households, aren’t at all times afforded the identical second possibilities. So how does Sheen reckon with that privilege?
Such nuanced queries don’t make it into “aka Charlie Sheen,” because it appears Renzi had different pursuits in thoughts, like making a movie Sheen didn’t even need to be part of.
“He did not want to make a documentary,” the director instructed Tudum. “[Sheen] was like, ‘Why step into this arena in this way?’”
That’s an incredible query, particularly because the actor is already releasing a tell-all e-book this fall that rehashes the identical tales. And but, he nonetheless sat for Renzi’s movie to seemingly set the report straight on rumors and tales about him that come to outline his public persona.
Nonetheless, a few of these moments don’t get all the eye they deserve; the doc’s director saves essentially the most weighty subjects for final — and makes a present of clearing out the diner he filmed Sheen’s interviews at for a non-public chat between the 2 — and breezes by way of them as in the event that they’re not among the many movie’s largest revelations that Sheen has by no means brazenly talked about.
The primary is the Corey Haim allegation that was made by actor Corey Feldman, who claimed that Haim instructed him that Sheen sexually assaulted the late actor throughout filming for 1986’s “Lucas.” Sheen vehemently denied the accusation earlier than encouraging anybody who’d pause the doc to Google the story to “go for it.”
For as typically as you hear Renzi’s voice all through the doc, he’s significantly quiet right here, and doesn’t push again as Sheen shrugs off the declare. “Fuck off,” the actor concludes.
The movie then transitions to deal with Sheen’s HIV prognosis, which Renzi explores with main questions concerning the actor being blackmailed over it and sued for allegedly knowingly passing HIV to his sexual companions, which Sheen additionally denied.
This half strikes on simply as swiftly to get to the “bombshell” that’s not precisely explosive (relying on who you ask): Sheen’s sexual experiences with males that began along with his use of crack cocaine — an admission that arrives within the final quarter-hour of the doc. He by no means truly says it outright, although.
As a substitute, Sheen talks round the subject exhaustedly with a convoluted metaphor about restaurant menus and appetizers, and in the end leaves it to those that are “gonna come out of the fucking woodwork” to elucidate the sexual encounters he’s had with males, true or in any other case. Renzi ultimately pries the confession out of Sheen, who then rattles off questions on what might’ve presumably led him down that path, however he doesn’t attempt to reply them. Ultimately, he merely chalks the experiences as much as being “weird” and “fun.”
That’s hardly the strategy you’d count on from a doc that guarantees Sheen is able to be extra open than ever. And that is the place “aka Charlie Sheen,” and docs alike, fall wanting delivering the susceptible movie star self-portrait it units out to be.
Don’t get me incorrect, there are nonetheless some introspective moments within the movie, like in Half 1, when Sheen explains how he was “deathly afraid” of how his drug use would get away from him after being launched to crack (and receiving oral intercourse on the identical time).
“I got a little shaky telling that… I could feel some of that shit coming back up,” Sheen admits within the doc.
Nonetheless, Renzi’s movie opts to give attention to moments that remind us extra of what Sheen has executed in his previous, reasonably than digging into the why behind these actions. And in most scenes the place Sheen displays on his worst publicized moments, he does so with little regard for what hardships he put these round him by way of. However Richards and Mueller fill in a few of these blanks.
In Half 2, Mueller remembers recanting her assertion a couple of drug-dazed, home violence incident that occurred round Christmas 2009, the place Sheen was arrested for allegedly holding a knife to her throat.
“I had to recant my story,” Mueller says, taking partial blame. “If I didn’t, then he could have gotten into a lot of trouble.” Sheen, who was arrested for the incident, acknowledges his half and says he and his ex-wife are “past it,” however the doc spends fairly a couple of minutes revisiting the general public fallout. It makes you surprise what the precise motive is that if not accountability.
“I don’t think it’s fair just to pick up these moments at Charlie’s lowest and define him as a human being based on those moments,” Mueller factors out. Humorous, as a result of that’s precisely what the doc is doing. The query is, do Renzi and Sheen notice that?
With that in thoughts, it is smart why Cryer expressed reservations about taking part in a doc that would both assist or damage Sheen’s plans to bounce again each personally and publicly.
“Part of the cycle of Charlie Sheen’s life has been that he messes up terribly, he hits rock bottom, and then he gets things going again,” Cryer says on the high of the movie, “and brings a lot of positivity in his life, and that’s when he burns himself out again.”
“aka Charlie Sheen” by no means fairly will get to the underside of that conundrum or the basis explanation for Sheen’s self-destructive methods, which misses your complete level of the documentary. If the aim was to put the actor’s life naked as soon as and for all, it ought to’ve tried to dig a little bit deeper.
Higher but, it ought to’ve made him dig deeper.
Subscribe to The Tradition Catchall to remain updated on all issues leisure.
