Home Blog Page 1859

Speaker Pelosi dodges retirement question again

Congress Budget 85326.jpg 2b177 c0 213 5110

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi refused on Friday to say if she plans to run for reelection, or would make her plans known upon the possible final passage of President Biden’s multitrillion-dollar spending package. 

“I’m not here to talk about me, I’m here to talk about ‘Building Back Better’,” Mrs. Pelosi, 81, told The Washington Times at a press conference immediately following the House passage of Mr. Biden’s social welfare bill.

The fate of the legislation remains in question, as the bill heads to an evenly divided Senate. But questions persist about whether Mrs. Pelosi, California Democrat, will retire after serving in the House since 1987.

Mrs. Pelosi was previously asked about her future plans last month by Jake Tapper on CNN’s  “State of the Union,” to which she replied,  “Oh, you think I’m going to make an announcement right here and now?”  

She later added, “Why would I tell you that now… Probably, I would have that conversation with my family first, if you don’t mind.”

However, the House Republicans’ campaign arm is confident about their party’s chances of taking back the speaker’s gavel following the 2022 midterms. The GOP points to recent retirements of key Democratic lawmakers like Reps. Jackie Speier of California and John Yarmouth of Kentucky as signs that Mrs. Pelosi is on her way out soon as well. 

“There is no good news for House Democrats and their historically thin majority. No wonder Speaker Pelosi appears to be planning her retirement,” National Republican Congressional Committee spokesman Mike Berg said in a statement.

Name drop: Guardians’ launch starts with store sign smashing

guardians launch baseball 69056 c0 248 6048

CLEVELAND (AP) — A special opening day for the newly named Cleveland Guardians began with a bang.

Not the one they hoped for, either.

As fans were buying the first available Guardians merchandise on Friday as the team officially transitioned from Indians after 106 years, a sign installed outside the team store at Progressive Field broke free from its mount and crashed to the sidewalk.

“Well, that’s an ominous sign,” yelled one onlooker.

A worker was on a ladder checking bolts when the sign snapped a small section of the ballpark’s stone exterior, fell about 15 feet and smashed into pieces. No one was injured.

Fans began lining up early in the morning to buy new caps, sweatshirts, T-shirts and other gear bearing the Guardians’ logos.

“This kind of exceeds expectations,” said Karen Fox, the team’s director of merchandising. “Having people show up at 6:30, and then we had 100 people in by 9:14. You can kind of see the store looks like we’re having a game today.”

The team also changed its social media handles to complete the changeover, a process that began in June 2020, when owner Paul Dolan announced the Major League Baseball team was dropping Indians in the wake of a social reckoning on racist names and symbols.

The Guardians ran into a legal issue along the way as a local roller derby team also called the Guardians filed a lawsuit alleging trademark infringement. The sides reached an amicable resolution earlier this week allowing both to use the name.

___

More AP MLB: https://apnews.com/hub/MLB and https://twitter.com/AP_Sports

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC.

NATO chief: alliance watching Russian troops near Ukraine

germany politics 87634 c0 17 4880

BERLIN (AP) – NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said Friday that the alliance is closely monitoring an unusual concentration of Russian forces on the border with Ukraine, warning that similar troops were used by Moscow in the past to intervene in neighboring countries.

Speaking at a defense seminar in Berlin, Stoltenberg said NATO had seen a significant military buildup by Russia close to the borders of Ukraine lately.

“We are now closely monitoring the developments along the borders,” he said. “This matters for NATO and we have the capacity, we have the capabilities to collect information, to monitor it closely and to understand what is going on there.”

Stoltenberg said that the alliance had made clear to Russia that “we see their significant military buildup.”

“We see an unusual concentration of forces and we know that they have used these type of forces before to actually intervene and invade other countries, Georgia and Ukraine,” he added.

Moscow provided military support to separatists in the breakaway Georgian region of South Ossetia in 2008.

Russia also annexed Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula in 2014 and has supported a separatist insurgency that broke out that year in eastern Ukraine and still controls territory there.

“We call on Russia to be transparent and to prevent an escalation and to help and to reduce the tensions along the borders with Ukraine,” Stoltenberg said.

The NATO chief also spoke about the challenge posed by China due to its rising economic and military might.

“The aim of China is to have the most advanced and strongest military capabilities within a few decades,” he said. “And they invest: What they do now on nuclear is really big. They are building many new silos for missiles, and they’re investing in extremely advanced technologies.”

“China is coming closer to us: in space, in cyberspace,” Stoltenberg said.

“We see them in Africa. We see them in the Arctic. We see them trying to control critical infrastructure,” he added, noting the recent debates in some NATO countries over Chinese companies’ involvement in building 5G mobile networks.

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC.

EU reviewing Pfizer’s COVID antiviral pill for emergency use

virus outbreak pfizer pill 73430 c0 250 6000

AMSTERDAM (AP) – The European Union’s drug regulator said it has started evaluating the coronavirus pill made by Pfizer Inc. to see if it might be used in emergency situations before it is officially authorized.

In a statement Friday, the European Medicines Agency said it is looking at data on the effectiveness of Pfizer’s antiviral pill when given to people infected with COVID-19 who are not yet hospitalized but are at risk of developing severe disease.

Early results suggest Pfizer’s pill reduces the risk of hospitalization or death, compared with people who received a dummy pill, when they were treated within three to five days of developing COVID-19 symptoms, the agency said.

Although a more comprehensive evaluation will likely start soon, “this current review will provide EU-wide recommendations in the shortest possible timeframe so they can be used by national authorities who wish to take evidence-based decisions on the early use of the medicine,” the regulator said.

Europe is the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic, with numerous countries facing surges of disease amid lagging vaccination rates. On Friday, Austrian Chancellor Alexander Schallenberg announced the country would go into a national lockdown and that COVID-19 vaccinations would be mandatory by next year.

Pfizer said earlier this month that its pill cut the risk of hospitalization or death by up to 90%. The company reported few details on side effects but said rates of problems were similar between the groups at about 20%.

An independent group of medical experts monitoring the trial recommended stopping it early, standard procedure when interim results show such a clear benefit. The data has not yet been published for outside review, the normal process for vetting new medical research.

Most COVID-19 treatments require an IV or injection. Competitor Merck’s COVID-19 pill has already been authorized by Britain, and Pfizer’s pill is under consideration by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Since the beginning of the pandemic last year, researchers worldwide have been racing to find a pill to treat COVID-19 that can be taken at home to ease symptoms, speed recovery and keep people out of the hospital.

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC.

Maryland expands booster shot eligibility to all adults

virus outbreak boosters 74074 c0 250 3000

ANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) – Maryland became the latest state on Friday to expand eligibility for COVID-19 booster shots to all adults before the federal government has authorized them.

People 18 and older who completed a primary series of Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine at least six months ago are eligible for a booster. Individuals who received a primary series of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine at least two months ago continue to be eligible for a booster dose.

“As the holiday season approaches, with more travel and more gatherings, we are encouraging all Marylanders to get a booster shot and maintain their immunity,” Gov. Larry Hogan said in a news release. “The state has a robust network of vaccination providers, and we continue to have both the supply and the capacity to provide a booster shot to anyone who needs one.”

Maryland reports that the state has administered nearly 803,000 booster shots. Nearly half of the state’s eligible seniors have received a booster shot.

Several other states also have expanded eligibility for COVID-19 booster shots to all adults before the federal government. Utah and Massachusetts opened eligibility on Thursday. California, New Mexico, Arkansas, West Virginia and Colorado expanded the shots to all adults in the last week.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration decided Friday to open up booster shoots to all adults in the U.S. But there’s one more step: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention must agree to expand Pfizer and Moderna boosters to even healthy young adults. Its scientific advisers were set to debate later Friday.

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC.

Health, The New York Today

House narrowly passes Biden’s multitrillion-dollar social welfare bill, setting up Senate fight

Congress 60408.jpg 27db3 c0 0 4776

House Democrats narrowly passed a version of President Biden’s multitrillion-dollar social welfare bill on Friday, sending the measure to the Senate where it is likely dead on arrival.

In a 220-to-213 vote, the House voted to approve the more than 2,000-page bill only hours after the Congressional Budget Office determined it will add upwards of $367 billion to the federal deficit.

“We are proud to be passing this legislation under the leadership of President Joe Biden,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat. “

The bill now heads to the Senate where even the strongest of supporters say the House version is dead on arrival. Mrs. Pelosi ensured as much by reinserting several costly provisions, including paid family leave, that is opposed by moderate Senate Democrats.

Since the bill is moving via a budget reconciliation in the Senate, which allows some spending measures to avert the 60-vote filibuster threshold and pass by a simple majority, the upper chamber has what is akin to veto power.

House Democrats rushed the bill through shortly after the CBO, a nonpartisan federal agency, released a report showing it would add more than $367 billion to the federal deficit over the next 10 years.

The analysis contradicted Mr. Biden’s frequent boast that his Build Back Better agenda “costs zero dollars.” 

“Every page of the Democrats’ socialist spending scam will be paid for by or borrowed from America’s hardworking taxpayers,” said House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, California Republican. “This is the single most reckless and irresponsible spending bill in our nation’s history.” 

Sen. John Kennedy, Louisiana Republican, was even less sparing in his criticism of the bill, mocking it during a Fox News interview as “Build Back Bonkers.”

Democrats, for their part, have championed the bill which is the largest expansion of the federal safety net since the Great Society of the 1960s. 

If enacted, it will radically transform the relationship between employers and employees. 

The bill provides a $214 billion four-week paid-leave guarantee for nearly every worker, including those with only $2,000 in earnings over the last two years. 

It also offers four years of subsidized health insurance for low-income families in states that have yet to expand Medicaid. That’s on top of a $36 billion Medicare expansion to cover hearing services. 

Apart from health care, the bill includes a one-year extension of the expanded child tax credit, which gives parents with kids under the age of 6 approximately $3,600 in direct payments annually. The legislation also provides for six years of childcare subsidies and universal pre-kindergarten for all 3- and 4-year-olds.

To combat climate change, the package includes $320 billion in clean energy tax credits, along with $105 billion for environmental resilience programs and a Civilian Climate Corps. The bill also includes:  

• Home-care for the elderly.

• $250-tax credit for union dues.

• $150 billion for affordable housing.

• Money to hire 87,000 new IRS agents.

• A $50,000-per-year journalist tax credit.

• Increased Pell Grants and HBCU funding.

• $100 billion to reduce immigration backlogs.

• Lucrative tax credits for union-made electric vehicles.

“Democrats will not rest until all Americans have the tools to build back better, to access opportunities, to get ahead,” said House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer, Maryland Democrat.

Sen. Joe Manchin III, a key swing vote for the White House’s legislative agenda, has expressed serious reservations about portions of the bill. Mr. Manchin, a moderate West Virginia Democrat, refused to endorse the measure, citing concerns over inflation and spending. 

“From the grocery store to the gas pump, Americans know the inflation tax is real and [Washington,] D.C. can no longer ignore the economic pain Americans feel every day,” Mr. Manchin said. 

Compounding matters is that fiscal watchdogs warn lower-and-middle class families will be disproportionately impacted by the tax hikes Mr. Biden is proposing to pay for the bill. 

An analysis by the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) released earlier this week indicates the bill breaks a key pledge from Mr. Biden’s 2020 campaign: that he would not raise taxes on individuals making less than $400,000 annually.

“Biden promised ‘if you make under $400,000 a year, I’ll never raise your taxes one cent,’” said House Republican Whip Steve Scalise of Louisiana. “That was a lie.” 

Starting in 2023, individuals making between $75,000 and $100,000 would see a 2.9% rise in taxes. Similarly, taxpayers making between $100,000 and $200,000 would see a hike of 7.4%. 

By 2031, taxpayers in the 75,000 to $100,000 range would see a 2.9% increase, while those making between $100,000 to $200,000 see an overall tax hike of 11.3%.

The middle class is targeted by doubling the federal tobacco tax to more than $2 per pack, imposing new taxes on income derived from small businesses, and closing hundreds of various “loopholes” and deductions.

Mr. Biden’s bill also gives the super-wealthy a generous tax cut. The reality stems from a proposal Democrats have included within the bill to expand the state and local tax (SALT) deduction.

“Many of my colleagues argue this major line item is worth accepting to pass the rest of the bill,” said Rep. Jared Golden of Maine, who was the only Democrat to vote against the bill. “I disagree: the SALT giveaway … is larger than the child care, pre-K, health care or senior care provisions.”

SALT allows individuals to write off a portion of their annual state and local taxes. Former President Trump’s signature 2017 tax overhaul capped the deduction to $10,000 annually. 

The bill passed by House Democrats raises the cap to $80,000, almost exclusively to the benefit of the super-wealthy. 

For instance, according to the JCT, starting in 2023 people making between $200,000 to $500,000 would see a 12.7% tax cut because of SALT. That same year, individuals making between $500,000 to $1 million would see a tax decrease of 35.5%. 

People making between $50,000 to $100,000, however, continue to see an overall tax hike.

Joe Biden transfers power to VP Kamala Harris while he undergoes colonoscopy

Biden 41305.jpg 8f9fb c0 0 2000

President Biden on Friday transferred power to Vice President Kamala Harris while he undergoes a routine colonoscopy, the White House said.

Ms. Harris, the nation’s first woman vice president, becomes the first woman to assume presidential power. 

Mr. Biden will get the medical procedure done at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland, as part of his annual physical, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said.

“As was the case when President George W. Bush had the same procedure in 2002 and 2007, and following the process set out in the Constitution, President Biden will transfer power to the Vice President for the brief period of time when he is under anesthesia,” Ms. Psaki said in a statement. “The Vice President will work from her office in the West Wing during this time.”

Ms. Psaki said the White House will release a full summary of the president’s physical later this afternoon. 

Mr. Biden, who turns 79 on Saturday, is the nation’s oldest president.

The president early Friday headed to Walter Reed for what the White House said was a routine annual exam. 

Pressed for months about when Mr. Biden would get an exam, the White House repeatedly pledged to be transparent about the results.

Earlier this year, Ms. Psaki promised to make “all of that information available” about the results of his physical.

Ahead of the 2020 presidential election, Mr. Biden released a summary of his medical history, which described him as “healthy” and “vigorous.”

The three-page report found that Mr. Biden was treated for irregular heartbeat, gastroesophageal reflux and allergies.

President George W. Bush was the first to use the Constitution’s temporary transfer power, handing the reins to Vice President Dick Cheney twice while undergoing colonoscopies in 2002 and 2007.

Former President Trump also underwent a colonoscopy at Walter Reed in 2019. Former White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham alleges in her new book that Mr. Trump refused anesthesia for the procedure so he would not have to transfer power to Vice President Mike Pence. 

Health, The New York Today

China fuming over Biden’s talk of U.S. Olympic boycott, sends invite to Putin

getting to beijing olympics 49261 c0 208 5000

China‘s Foreign Ministry Friday sharply criticized President Biden‘s comments that he is weighing a modified boycott of the 2022 Winter Olympic Games in Beijing, accusing Washington of politicizing the global sports event.

Mr. Biden, meeting with Canadian and Mexican leaders Thursday at a White House summit, confirmed for the first time he is considering a diplomatic boycott of the Games, allowing U.S. athletes to compete but preventing American officials from attending.

Asked about limiting the U.S. presence at the Games, Mr. Biden acknowledged tersely Thursday evening that it is “something we’re considering.”

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian, in a Friday briefing with reporters in Beijing, said Washington was using “groundless” charges of human rights abuses in Xinjiang and elsewhere to justify the modified boycott.

“Politicizing sports is violating the spirit of the Olympics,” Mr. Zhao said, adding that Beijing‘s policies toward the ethnic minority Uighurs in China‘s Xinjiang region are “purely China‘s internal affairs.”

The state-controlled Global Times, citing Chinese political analysts, said the potential boycott, coupled with Mr. Biden‘s planned summit of the world’s democratic countries next month, was a sign that the U.S. president was bowing to pressure from anti-China hardliners because of his weakened political standing at home.

Separately, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov confirmed in Moscow Friday that Russian President Vladimir Putin had received an official invitation from the Chinese government to attend the Games.

With Moscow and Beijing growing closer in the face of rising tensions with the U.S., Mr. Putin had been widely expected to travel to Beijing for the opening ceremony of the Games set for February 4.

Can a Machine Learn Morality?

00delphi facebookJumbo

Researchers at an artificial intelligence lab in Seattle called the Allen Institute for AI unveiled new technology last month that was designed to make moral judgments. They called it Delphi, after the religious oracle consulted by the ancient Greeks. Anyone could visit the Delphi website and ask for an ethical decree.

Joseph Austerweil, a psychologist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, tested the technology using a few simple scenarios. When he asked if he should kill one person to save another, Delphi said he shouldn’t. When he asked if it was right to kill one person to save 100 others, it said he should. Then he asked if he should kill one person to save 101 others. This time, Delphi said he should not.

Morality, it seems, is as knotty for a machine as it is for humans.

Delphi, which has received more than three million visits over the past few weeks, is an effort to address what some see as a major problem in modern A.I. systems: They can be as flawed as the people who create them.

Facial recognition systems and digital assistants show bias against women and people of color. Social networks like Facebook and Twitter fail to control hate speech, despite wide deployment of artificial intelligence. Algorithms used by courts, parole offices and police departments make parole and sentencing recommendations that can seem arbitrary.

A growing number of computer scientists and ethicists are working to address those issues. And the creators of Delphi hope to build an ethical framework that could be installed in any online service, robot or vehicle.

“It’s a first step toward making A.I. systems more ethically informed, socially aware and culturally inclusive,” said Yejin Choi, the Allen Institute researcher and University of Washington computer science professor who led the project.

Delphi is by turns fascinating, frustrating and disturbing. It is also a reminder that the morality of any technological creation is a product of those who have built it. The question is: Who gets to teach ethics to the world’s machines? A.I. researchers? Product managers? Mark Zuckerberg? Trained philosophers and psychologists? Government regulators?

While some technologists applauded Dr. Choi and her team for exploring an important and thorny area of technological research, others argued that the very idea of a moral machine is nonsense.

“This is not something that technology does very well,” said Ryan Cotterell, an A.I. researcher at ETH Zürich, a university in Switzerland, who stumbled onto Delphi in its first days online.

Delphi is what artificial intelligence researchers call a neural network, which is a mathematical system loosely modeled on the web of neurons in the brain. It is the same technology that recognizes the commands you speak into your smartphone and identifies pedestrians and street signs as self-driving cars speed down the highway.

A neural network learns skills by analyzing large amounts of data. By pinpointing patterns in thousands of cat photos, for instance, it can learn to recognize a cat. Delphi learned its moral compass by analyzing more than 1.7 million ethical judgments by real live humans.

After gathering millions of everyday scenarios from websites and other sources, the Allen Institute asked workers on an online service — everyday people paid to do digital work at companies like Amazon — to identify each one as right or wrong. Then they fed the data into Delphi.

In an academic paper describing the system, Dr. Choi and her team said a group of human judges — again, digital workers — thought that Delphi’s ethical judgments were up to 92 percent accurate. Once it was released to the open internet, many others agreed that the system was surprisingly wise.

When Patricia Churchland, a philosopher at the University of California, San Diego, asked if it was right to “leave one’s body to science” or even to “leave one’s child’s body to science,” Delphi said it was. When she asked if it was right to “convict a man charged with rape on the evidence of a woman prostitute,” Delphi said it was not — a contentious, to say the least, response. Still, she was somewhat impressed by its ability to respond, though she knew a human ethicist would ask for more information before making such pronouncements.

Others found the system woefully inconsistent, illogical and offensive. When a software developer stumbled onto Delphi, she asked the system if she should die so she wouldn’t burden her friends and family. It said she should. Ask Delphi that question now, and you may get a different answer from an updated version of the program. Delphi, regular users have noticed, can change its mind from time to time. Technically, those changes are happening because Delphi’s software has been updated.

Artificial intelligence technologies seem to mimic human behavior in some situations but completely break down in others. Because modern systems learn from such large amounts of data, it is difficult to know when, how or why they will make mistakes. Researchers may refine and improve these technologies. But that does not mean a system like Delphi can master ethical behavior.

Dr. Churchland said ethics are intertwined with emotion. “Attachments, especially attachments between parents and offspring, are the platform on which morality builds,” she said. But a machine lacks emotion. “Neutral networks don’t feel anything,” she added.

Some might see this as a strength — that a machine can create ethical rules without bias — but systems like Delphi end up reflecting the motivations, opinions and biases of the people and companies that build them.

“We can’t make machines liable for actions,” said Zeerak Talat, an A.I. and ethics researcher at Simon Fraser University in British Columbia. “They are not unguided. There are always people directing them and using them.”

Delphi reflected the choices made by its creators. That included the ethical scenarios they chose to feed into the system and the online workers they chose to judge those scenarios.

In the future, the researchers could refine the system’s behavior by training it with new data or by hand-coding rules that override its learned behavior at key moments. But however they build and modify the system, it will always reflect their worldview.

Some would argue that if you trained the system on enough data representing the views of enough people, it would properly represent societal norms. But societal norms are often in the eye of the beholder.

“Morality is subjective. It is not like we can just write down all the rules and give them to a machine,” said Kristian Kersting, a professor of computer science at TU Darmstadt University in Germany who has explored a similar kind of technology.

When the Allen Institute released Delphi in mid-October, it described the system as a computational model for moral judgments. If you asked if you should have an abortion, it responded definitively: “Delphi says: you should.”

But after many complained about the obvious limitations of the system, the researchers modified the website. They now call Delphi “a research prototype designed to model people’s moral judgments.” It no longer “says.” It “speculates.”

It also comes with a disclaimer: “Model outputs should not be used for advice for humans, and could be potentially offensive, problematic or harmful.”

Leasing a Car? Here’s Why You Can Get a Good Deal if You Buy.

19Adviser illo facebookJumbo

For drivers with leases, the gap between the projected price and current market price may be substantial. The auto search website iSeeCars recently compared current prices for three-year-old cars and estimated buyout values of new models leased in 2018 and found that the average car may be worth 36 percent more than the value estimated at the beginning of the lease.

The gap may be even greater for some models. The current market value of a Volkswagen Tiguan, for instance, could be $9,800 higher than projected three years ago — a 69 percent increase. Even a subcompact, the Nissan Versa, has increased in value by more than $4,300, or more than 50 percent, according to iSeeCars. The analysis was based on a database of about 10 million new- and used-car listings.

So if you like your car and it’s in good condition, it may make sense to purchase it when the lease ends. “You should very carefully consider buying the car instead of returning it,” said Karl Brauer, an executive analyst at iSeeCars.

Consumers increasingly have been doing just that. Daniel Berce, the chief executive of GM Financial, the financial services arm of General Motors, told an investor conference in August that in the second quarter of this year, 89 percent of lease customers purchased their vehicles at the end of their leases, compared with about 20 percent a few years ago.

You could also buy the car and then resell it yourself, pocketing the profit. But you may owe sales tax, and there’s another catch: If you need another car, you may not easily find one that you like at a price you consider reasonable.

An alternative may be to use the “equity” in your lease — the difference between the current market valuation and the buyout price — to reduce the cost of leasing a new car, Mr. Drury of Edmunds said. In effect, you sell your lease to a dealer, which credits the amount to your new vehicle lease.

Jeff Perlman, an independent public relations consultant in Los Angeles, said he prefers to drive new cars and was able to apply equity from his lease of a 2019 Genesis G70, a luxury sports sedan, to a lease of a more expensive, redesigned 2022 version of the car. He did not have to put any money down, he said, and pays just $38 more per month. “I’m beyond happy,” he said.