Home Blog Page 2252

South Korea missile accident panics public on edge

south korea koreas tensions 89498 c0 221 5310

SEOUL, South Korea — A South Korean ballistic missile malfunctioned and crashed into the ground during a live-fire drill with the United States, panicking confused residents of a coastal city already uneasy over increasingly provocative weapons tests by rival North Korea.

The sound of the blast and subsequent fire on Tuesday night led many in Gangneung to believe it could be a North Korean attack, concern that only grew as the military and government officials provided no explanation about the explosion for hours.

South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff said Wednesday that there were so far no reports of any injuries from the accident, which involved a short-range Hyumoo-2 ballistic missile that crashed into the ground inside an air force base near the city.

The military said it was investigating what caused the “abnormal flight” of a missile that is a key weapon in South Korea’s preemptive and retaliatory strike strategies against the North.

The military said the test was meant to be a show of strength by South Korea and the United States, following North Korea’s firing just hours earlier of a nuclear-capable ballistic missile that crossed over Japan.

The launch over Japan was North Korea’s most provocative weapons demonstration in years. It extended a record number of North Korean launches this year as the country pushes to develop a fully fledged nuclear arsenal capable of threatening the U.S. mainland and its allies with the goal of wresting concessions from those countries.

The South Korean military’s acknowledgement of the missile malfunction came hours after internet users raised alarm about the blast and posted social media videos showing an orange ball of flames emerging from an area they described as near the air force base.

Officials at Gangneung’s fire department and city hall said emergency workers were dispatched to the air force base and a nearby army base Tuesday night in response to calls about a possible explosion but were sent back by military officials.

North Korea has fired nearly 40 ballistic missiles over about 20 different launch events this year, exploiting Russia’s war on Ukraine and a deepened division in the U.N. Security Council to accelerate arms development.

North Korea’s state media hadn’t commented on its launch over Japan as of Wednesday morning.

The United States, Britain, France, Albania, Norway and Ireland called for an emergency meeting of the Security Council over the latest North Korean launch. Diplomats said it is likely to be held Wednesday, but it’s not certain whether it will be open or closed.

South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff said Tuesday’s joint drills with the U.S. also involved firing four Army Tactical Missile Systems missiles. The allies earlier on Tuesday launched fighter jets that fired weapons at a target off South Korea’s west coast.

Copyright © 2022 The Washington Times, LLC.

Harris latches onto abortion issue to boost Democrats and her own political fortunes

Biden 20700.jpg 13945 c0 232 5565

Vice President Kamala Harris is leading Democrats’ efforts to elevate abortion access as the defining issue of the mid-term cycle, hoping to regain her footing after personal efforts to thwart illegal immigration and bolster voting rights stumbled.

For Ms. Harris, the abortion issue offers what should be a safe foothold as her party eyes her as a fall-back option if President Biden does not run in 2024.

Ms. Harris on Tuesday sat next to President Biden at the second meeting of a task force forged to address the Supreme Court ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade and the national right to abortion. Yet the vice president spoke first, setting the tone as the host of the meeting.

“The Dobbs decision created a health care crisis in America,” Ms. Harris, seated at the center of a long table, told the task force. “We believe, and I certainly believe, that a woman should have the freedom to make decisions about her own body. The government should not be making those decisions for her.”

Ms. Harris singled out two swing states — Arizona and Wisconsin — for reimposing bans that stretch back to the 19th century in the wake of the court’s decision.

Mr. Biden said he ordered Education Secretary Miguel Cardona to take a look at ways to ensure access to contraception and information about birth control on college campuses, as some schools clamp down.


SEE ALSO: Pro-life activists to march Wednesday on Ohio statehouse


“Folks, what century are we in?” Mr. Biden said, before thanking Mr. Harris for her leadership on the task force.

Mr. Biden gave Ms. Harris a long to-do list during his first term, turning her into a perpetual czar of thorny problems. 

Yet GOP critics lambasted her for failing to visit the southern border despite being tasked with addressing the illegal immigration crisis, and Democrats made little progress on their legislative ideas to protect voting rights. 

Trips designed to bolster her foreign policy credentials haven’t gone smoothly, either. A recent tour of East Asia was marred by Ms. Harris accidentally touting the U.S. alliance “with the Republic of North Korea” during her visit to the demilitarized zone dividing the Korean Peninsula.

“She has just not caught fire. She has not latched onto an issue that allows her to show her best side,” said Ross Baker, a politics professor at Rutgers University.

Democrats are hoping abortion will be the issue that boosts Ms. Harris’s stock. She is serving as the first female vice president in U.S. history while over a dozen states impose strict restrictions on abortion, making her an obvious figure to take on the debate.

Ms. Harris is crisscrossing the country to discuss reproductive health and abortion access with state and local leaders. She will travel to Connecticut on Wednesday to discuss abortion access in New Britain with Rep. Jahana Hayes and Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Federation of America and the Planned Parenthood Action Fund.

This weekend, she will travel to Austin, Texas, to meet with reproductive rights advocates ahead of a reception for Texas Democrats.

“She’s found her groove,” Donna Brazile, a former Democratic National Committee chairwoman, told CNN last month. “She has really been able to help the White House communicate its message on choice, on freedom and on equality — and that matters in a close election.”

Forecasters say Republicans will likely retake the House in this year’s mid-terms, but not by as many seats as initially thought, and may struggle to recapture the evenly divided Senate, in which Ms. Harris serves as a tie-breaker for Democrats.

Democrats see the Supreme Court’s abortion ruling as a key rallying point before the November contests. They hope Democrats concerned about abortion restrictions in GOP-led states, or the prospect of a national ban, will eat into the “red wave” that was anticipated earlier this year.

“The Supreme Court opened up a political debate that many Republicans would just as soon avoid, but unfortunately for them, the extreme elements within their party keep on adding fuel to the fire. For the vice president not to be engaged makes no sense,” said Jim Manley, a Democratic strategist and former spokesman for the late Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada.

Democrats are seizing, in particular, on a plan by Sen. Lindsey Graham, South Carolina Republican, that would ban abortion nationwide after 15 weeks, though some in the GOP have distanced themselves from the idea after saying the topic would be up to the states.

It’s a strategy that could appeal to women voters and young people who are vital to Democrats’ fortunes in any election year, though it’s not without risks.

A Monmouth University poll this week found economic issues are a bigger factor for midterm voters than concerns about abortion rights or democracy. Independents, in particular, are focused on rising prices even though Democrats are zeroing in on things like abortion access.

Only 31% of U.S. adults approved of President Biden’s handling of abortion, the pollsters said, indicating Ms. Harris has work to do.

The administration is prodding Congress to codify the broad right to abortion that was overturned by the Supreme Court about 100 days ago. In the meantime, the Biden administration is taking executive action where it can. 

The White House said Tuesday it is allocating $6 million in grant money for family planning and research and teenage pregnancy prevention in Florida, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Wisconsin.

Ms. Harris’ focus on the issue can be seen as a personal reset for Ms. Harris, who was hounded by low approval ratings early in her tenure and faced reports about dissatisfaction among her staff and high-level departure from her office.

Ms. Harris’s 2020 presidential bid started with promise but quickly fizzled. Still, she is floated as a potential 2024 alternative if Mr. Biden decides not to run, given her position as the No. 2 in the administration.

“Kamala won’t be the last woman to be vice president — or president,” Mr. Biden told guests at a Jewish New Year event last week in the White House East Room.

Some analysts say she still needs to prove she is the heir apparent.

“Harris is in a situation that has been faced by other vice-presidents, which is visibility without real power. Perhaps had she been longer in the Senate she might have made friendships that she could draw on to give Biden a lift on close votes,” Mr. Baker said. 

Ms. Harris’s approval rating dove to around 30% in November 2021 and April of this year, according to averages compiled by FiveThirtyEight. Things have improved a bit recently, with her average close to 38%, though around half the country still disapproves of her performance.

“If Biden and Harris expect pro-abortion extremism to save them from their dismal job approval, they are mistaken,” said Mallory Carroll, the vice president of communications at Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America.

She pointed to a Trafalgar Group poll that found majorities in every age group would prefer a federal bill that limits abortion after 15 weeks — with exceptions for rape and incest and allowing for state-level restrictions —  while a minority backs a Democratic plan that would allow abortion without limits.

“When Americans understand the reality of the Democratic Party’s radical agenda, they reject it,” Ms. Carroll said.

Chinese Embassy tries to silence Pompeo broadcasts into China

Election 2024 Pompeo 40740.jpg 98e34 c0 250 6000

China’s government is seeking to silence former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo for comments critical of the ruling Communist Party made during a new series of broadcasts that seek to speak directly to the Chinese people.

The first broadcast on September 14 focused on differentiating between the Chinese Communist Party (CPC) and China’s 1.4 billion people, a key China policy approach launched by Mr. Pompeo at the State Department during the Trump administration.

The Chinese Embassy in Washington responded to the broadcast by sending an angry letter to the Hudson Institute, the Washington think tank that is hosting the broadcasts at its new China Center. The Sept. 27 letter criticized Mr. Pompeo for making a “groundless accusation against the Communist Party of China.”

“Any attempts to cut off the blood ties between the CPC and the Chinese people are doomed to fail,” the letter, signed “the Chinese Embassy in the US,” stated.

Mr. Pompeo tweeted the letter Tuesday with the comment: “The CCP wants me to stop speaking the truth. Ain’t gonna happen.” The tweet included an emoji of a person placing a paper in a trash can.

The former secretary of state, who recently traveled to Taiwan, told The Washington Times he is undeterred by the criticism.

“The CCP seems highly peeved by the truth,” Mr. Pompeo said. “Seeking to silence me is at odds with its claims that, as a former secretary of state, I’m irrelevant.”

He added: “In any event, I intend to keep speaking to the American people about how the CCP has impacted their lives, and to the Chinese people about how they can have better lives too once their oppressor is confronted.”

Hudson President John Walter issued a statement on Twitter rejecting the Chinese criticism.

“The genocidal #CPP is the oppressor of the Chinese people & an enemy of free people around the globe,” he wrote in a tweet. “The Chinese people know this & the American people know it. … No one at Hudson is intimidated by this.”

Miles Yu, the director of the China Center who served as Mr. Pompeo’s chief China policymaker, said the former secretary of state has wanted for some time to speak directly to the Chinese people. The Hudson broadcasts were planned for when Mr. Pompeo was still in office, “but we ran out of time,” Mr. Yu said.

“As a private citizen, this is his passion — to talk to the Chinese people directly and this is something the CCP fears because they falsely claim they represent the people of China,” Mr. Yu said, adding, “We will continue this series because truth will never expire.”

Mr. Pompeo has been a major target of Chinese attacks for his criticisms of the government. As secretary of state from 2018 to 2021, the one-time Republican congressman from Kansas initiated a significant shift in U.S. policy toward China, pushing tougher policies on issues of human rights and aggressive maritime activities.

In January 2021, shortly before leaving office, he officially declared that Beijing’s repressive policies against minority Uyghurs in western China amounted to a “genocide.”

China has denied the charge and according to a recent State Department report, has used disinformation operations worldwide to obscure its treatment of the Uyghurs.

Mr. Pompeo, who headed the CIA under Mr. Trump before moving to the State Department, also shut down the Chinese consulate in Houston that U.S. officials said had been used as a major intelligence collection point.

During a visit to the Philippines in July 2020, Mr. Pompeo said Chinese claims to own some 90% of the South China Sea were “completely unlawful.”

The Chinese Embassy letter stated that the Communist Party, which has ruled China since 1949, was “founded for the people and nurtured by the people, and claimed that some 800 million people have climbed out of poverty under its rule. The statement is a reference to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s recent claim that his anti-poverty campaign had drastically reduced poverty rates among China’s 1.4 billion people.

However, current Chinese Premier Li Keqiang appeared to contradict the president, noting that in 2020 some 600 million Chinese were still earning the equivalent of $140 a month — not enough to pay rent.

“The average per-capita annual income in China is [$4,193], but there are over 600 million people whose monthly income is barely [$140], not enough to rent a room in Chinese cities,” Mr. Li said during a Beijing press conference.

The think tank’s rejection of Chinese officials’ criticism is a marked departure from a similar, more successful effort by Beijing to cancel a Hudson speech by a Chinese dissident in 2018.

Four years ago, a Hudson program called the Kleptocracy Initiative, created to highlight global corruption, scheduled a speech by Chinese dissident billionaire Guo Wengui, a former insider who fled China and has begun publicizing what he said was corruption among senior CCP leaders. The speech was canceled hours before the program was to begin as a result of what a former Hudson associate said were direct threats from the Chinese Embassy.

The Chinese notified the institute in emails that if the dissident’s speech went forward, visits to China by Hudson scholars would be blocked.

A Hudson spokesman said at that time the reason for the cancellation was the result of poor planning.

Jim Redmond, who helped injured son limp across finish line in 1992 Olympics, dies at 81

1992 barcelona redmond 58982 c0 195 2742

Jim Redmond, the father of British Olympic sprinter Derek Redmond who created an iconic moment when he helped his injured son cross the finish line in the 1992 Barcelona games, has died. He was 81.

Derek Redmond was shaping up to be a finalist in the 400-meter race after posting the fastest time in the first round and winning his quarterfinal race. 

But Redmond tore his hamstring just after halfway through his semifinal race, which is when dad Jim leapt onto the track and aided a sobbing Derek across the finish line, creating a memorable Olympic moment in the process.

Jim was a torch bearer when London hosted the Olympic Games in 2012.    

“He tried to talk me out of [finishing] at first,” Derek recalled during an interview with BBC in 2012. “He was telling me that I had nothing to prove and that I didn’t need to do this, but I told him I was going to finish. Then he said that we would do it together.”

“So we did, and I limped over the line in tears.”

U.S., East Asian allies must boost cooperation as North Korean threat grows, ex-U.S. commander says

aptopix nato summit biden 67372 c0 190 4557

The U.S.-South Korea military alliance is the “strongest” defense partnership that America has with any nation in the world, according to a former top U.S. commander in the region, but “trilateral cooperation” between the U.S., South Korea and Japan must be improved to more effectively prepare for threats emanating from North Korea.

“Any conflict on the Korean Peninsula is going to be regional and probably even global,” said Walter Lawrence “Skip” Sharp, a retired Army four-star general, who last served as commander of United Nations Command, ROK-U.S. Combined Forces Command and U.S. Forces Korea from 2008 to 2011.

The tangled history between Japan and South Korea has long complicated Washington’s attempts to coordinate security policy with its two key East Asian allies and present a united front to North Korea, which demonstrated again the threat it poses to the region Tuesday with a major new missile test that flew in part over Japanese airspace.

“It is critical for [South Korea], the United States and Japan to work together in areas of missile defense and intelligence,” Gen. Sharp told “The Washington Brief,” a virtual event series hosted by The Washington Times Foundation.

“Japan also brings a very strong strike capability that would greatly contribute to defending against any attack from North Korea,” he said.

Gen. Sharp’s comments during a “Washington Brief” discussion broadcast online Tuesday came as Japan increases its defense spending amid mounting provocations by Pyongyang, and as friction between Seoul and Tokyo shows signs of easing after years of intense bickering and a near-breakdown in bilateral ties.


SEE ALSO: U.S., South Korea hold bombing drills after North Korean missile launch over Japan


South Korea, U.S. and Japanese warships held their first trilateral anti-submarine drills in five years last month, as North Korea carried out a wave of missile tests in an apparent response to other joint military exercises by South Korean and U.S. forces.

“I am very encouraged … [that] this trilateral cooperation has started and is continuing,” said Gen. Sharp, who stressed that the three-way defensive exercises show that Seoul, Washington and Tokyo “are working together to be able to deter North Korean submarine attacks or provocations and clearly prepared to respond if those happen.”

U.S.-led efforts to counter the North Korean threat have been challenged during recent years by long-simmering tensions between South Korea and Japan over bilateral issues and historical tensions dating back to Japan’s long colonial domination of the Korean peninsula in the early 20th century. Things got so bad that Seoul threatened in 2019 to cancel a key intelligence-sharing pact with Japan.

South Koreans still bristle at Japan’s treatment of the country, first as a colony in the early 20th century and then during World War II. Japanese officials have argued Tokyo long ago made reparations for its actions and have accused Seoul of trying to revive historical grievances for domestic political gain.

Friction between the two soared in 2018 when Tokyo accused a South Korean navy destroyer of targeting a Japanese aircraft with fire-control radar. Tokyo subsequently announced trade sanctions targeting exports vital to South Korea’s technology sector — a move that triggered outbursts of anti-Japan sentiment in South Korea.

But the two have upheld their three-way alliance with the U.S., and the tensions began easing earlier this year in the face of increasingly aggressive North Korean ballistic missile tests, as well as U.S. intelligence warnings that Pyongyang may be on the verge of carrying out a seventh test of a nuclear bomb.

North Korea has not carried such a nuclear test since 2017, but as concerns began mounted that one may be imminent last June, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and new South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol met with President Biden on the sidelines of a NATO summit in Madrid and expressed hope to resolve their nations’ historical tensions.

The Associated Press has since reported that Mr. Kishida is pushing for a dramatic expansion of Japanese defense spending that would give Tokyo the world’s third-largest military budget in the coming years, after the United States and China.

Japan is currently upgrading its missile capabilities and reportedly preparing them for potential preemptive strikes — a move critics say would fundamentally change the country’s defense policy and breach the post-World War II pacifist constitution that has long placed limits on the Japanese military’s use of force.

Strongest alliance ‘anywhere’

With that as a backdrop, Gen. Sharp emphasized the strength of the military partnership between the U.S. and South Korea, which is home to U.S. Army Garrison-Humphreys, America’s largest overseas military base.

“This alliance between [South Korea] and the United States…from a military alliance perspective, I truly do believe is the strongest alliance that the United States has anywhere in the world,” he told The Washington Brief.

Gen. Sharp noted the unique “combined forces” aspect of the alliance that puts U.S. and South Korean soldiers and officers on equal footing at every level of the command structure. He also pointed to the integrated presence in South Korea of the U.N. command, which means military officers from 18 other nations from around the world are part of the force.

With the North an ever-present conventional and nuclear threat, Seoul’s “defense budget is larger, percentage wise of their GDP, than any of our NATO allies,” the general noted, spending that is vital as Pyongyang’s leaders are “now talking about having tactical nuclear weapons deployed close to the border” with South Korea.

The Washington Brief’s regular panelists, former CIA official and longtime U.S. diplomatic adviser Joseph DeTrani and Alexandre Mansourov, an adjunct professor at Georgetown University’s Center for Security Studies, also emphasized the danger posed by the potential deployment of lower-yield, “tactical” nuclear weapons by North Korea.

Mr. Mansourov pointed to the recent passage of a new North Korean law enshrining a policy of preemptive nuclear strikes to protect regime in the event that leader Kim Jong Un comes under attack or North Korea faces the threat of an imminent nuclear strike.

“Essentially, it says that North Korea can launch a preemptive nuclear strike if it detects an imminent attack of any kind,” Mr. Mansourov said.

Mr. DeTrani added that the stakes are so high at the moment that “we really do need to sit down with the North Koreans to move away from extreme tension that we have and the possibility of greater escalation and the possibility of stumbling into something of an accidental … conflict that could even possibly include the use of nuclear weapons.”

At the same time, Gen. Sharp emphasized that “North Korea has a huge conventional military capability that is located and deployed ready to fight just north of the demilitarized zone.”

“They have over 6,000 medium and long-range artillery systems [and] 4,000 of those could hit Korea — could hit Seoul — without even moving,” he said.

“North Korea also has the largest Special Operation Forces in the world and they have a cyber capability that they have demonstrated,” Gen. Sharp added, pointing also to Pyongyang’s development of other futuristic weapons “from hypersonics to heavy missiles that can fire from many different platforms, including submarines.”

Iranian Women Raise Voice in Protests against the Hijab

Author: Farzin Vajihi, Political and Energy Policy analyst, Journalist.

            In the recent past, Iranian government has increasingly suppressed and oppressed women because of not wearing a hijab or improper dressing in the hijab. This has resulted in many protests across the country. Recently, a woman arrested by the morality police named Mahsa Amini, aged 22 years, died after a beating by morality police sparking protests where women burned their hijabs and cut their hair as a show of solidarity. Most women in Iran are now protesting against the mandatory wearing of the hijab in public places for two main reasons. Firstly, most women feel the Iranian government is violating their freedoms on what to wear and when. Secondly, some think that the morality police enforcing the dress code on women are using too much force to abuse the freedoms and rights of women in Iran. As a result, there is a growing protest movement of Iranian women and those supporting their course to use the anti-hijab demands to ask for other women’s rights and freedoms, making it more than a hijab issue.

            The Islamic revolution in 1979 marked the start of the hijab requirement for women, although there was no law or force in place to enforce it. At this time, the government indicated that based on the principles of Prophet Mohammed and the Quran teachings, women were required to wear veils to cover their heads and faces in public places. However, there were protests against it, leading to relaxation through enforcement. Finally, in 1983, it was officially enacted, and the women violating the wearing of the hijab dress code could receive a punishment of lashes from the morality police. With time, the sentence also included confinement in a jail facility for up to 60 days once arrested for breaking the mandatory hijab law in Iran. Despite these restrictions, women have continued to protest against the policy, turning it into a call for other women’s rights by the feminist movements in the country and other parts of the world. As a result, most women in Iran wear the hijab loosely or let it fall over their shoulders.

            One of the issues raised by most Iranian women is the legitimacy of such a law under religious grounds resulting in protests. Most of the activists against the mandatory hijab have indicated that the Quran and other religious doctrines for the Islamic nation do not speak about the hijab but a veil. The lack of clarity and description of how the cover should be worn has sparked resistance by many women opposed to the mandatory requirement. Secondly, the morality police have been so harsh on women and abused their freedoms, including physical abuse protected by the government and perpetrated by the officers. For instance, in the recent past, most news stories from Iran have covered a report of a 22-year-old Iranian lady who was hit by the morality police many times because of not wearing the hijab properly. In the end, the woman fainted and died, although dismissed due to a heart attack. The family and witnesses indicated she was perfectly okay. This has sparked protests in Iran and other nations, where many women have shown solidarity by cutting their hair and burning their hijabs in objection to the government. This indicated the growing dissatisfaction among the Iranian women and the enriched movement that could force the Iranian government to change the policy.

            The use of violence by the police in implementing the mandatory hijab in Iran and other traditional norms that deny women many freedoms and rights preferred by the United Nations Commission on human rights and other feminist groups have resulted in a growing interest in advocating for women’s rights in Iran. The anti-hijab protests have turned not only against wearing the head scarf but also against other women’s rights being violated in the country. This recent trend, backed up by feminist and women’s rights movements worldwide, strengthens the protests to achieve these freedoms from the government. Most women complain about the lack of equal educational and job opportunities for women in the country. Men only dominate some fields. Women are considered objects to fulfill the sexual desires of their husbands and give birth to children, especially the male gender. This leaves many young girls stopping education and forcefully getting married at a young age. These issues and the nature of male dominance in Iran have come up in the protests against hijab-wearing.

            In summary, mandatory hijab requirements have sparked mixed reactions and protests against the government’s harassment of women and abuse of their freedoms. Most of the pro-hijab supporters have indicated that not only is this a religious requirement but also a part of the Islamic culture of Iranians, which the nations should respect. However, Iran has many ethnic affiliations with different beliefs and interpretations on the way of dressing and some of the freedoms. Besides, some advocate women’s rights are fundamental and universally agreed upon as the minimum of human rights. However, this has made the issue of culture be demeaned as it is being used as an excuse to continue the physical abuse of women and denial of their rights while protecting the male dominance on the other hand that is oppressive to the women.

GOP candidate tepid on Trump in Nevada gubernatorial debate: ‘I wouldn’t say great’

Election 2022 Nevada Governor Debate 41923.jpg 557a0 c0 125 3000

RENO, Nev. — Nevada’s Republican gubernatorial candidate, Joe Lombardo, sought in a debate on Sunday to distance himself from former President Donald Trump over his lies about the 2020 election, but said Trump’s policies were better than those under the Biden administration, which he blames for inflation and rising interest rates. 

“It’s an abysmal failure. In my opinion Trump moved the country forward,” Lombardo said. But when asked whether Trump was “a great president,” Lombardo hesitated, saying, “I wouldn’t say great, I think he was a sound president.”

Lombardo said he was bothered by Trump’s false claims of a stolen election, saying that he was “not shying away from that” and agreeing that Trump lying about election fraud undermined the confidence of the voters. 

Trump is scheduled to campaign for Lombardo next weekend, setting up a potentially awkward meeting. 

The debate with incumbent Democratic Gov. Steve Sisolak was a mostly cordial exchange animated by subjects that are defining midterm races across the country: abortion rights, the economy and inflation, education and crime, which by some measures is up in the Las Vegas area where Lombardo has spent his career in law enforcement and has served as sheriff since 2015.

A third of registered voters in Nevada are Democrats, while nonpartisan voters barely edge out Republicans, making the contest among the nation’s most closely watched. Nonpartisan registration has outpaced both major parties this year and Democratic registration has largely stalled, with some switching their registration to Republican.

ABORTION

Echoing efforts by Democrats nationwide, Sisolak sought to make abortion access a campaign centerpiece, saying voters “have a clear choice in this race.” It’s a tricky topic for Lombardo, who has touted since the Republican primary that he would govern through a “pro-life lens” but has flip-flopped on certain measures.

Sisolak is a staunch supporter of abortion rights and has worked to make Nevada a safe haven for the procedure as neighboring Utah, Arizona and Idaho have restricted access. He has attempted to paint Lombardo as an anti-abortion extremist. A big screen outside the debate said “Joe Lombardo wants to ban contraception.”

Lombardo will keep contraceptives “accessible,” he said on his website in a 106-word explanation for his abortion stance that during the primary race had three words: “Joe is pro-life.”

Lombardo told KRNV-TV that he would overturn Sisolak’s June executive order that protects out-of-state abortion patients and in-state providers. Days later, he told The Associated Press only that he would view it through a “pro-life lens” but did not cite specific action. In a letter posted on his website last week, he said that he would uphold the order. 

Earlier this month, Lombardo said he would oppose a national abortion ban proposed by South Carolina Sen. Lindsay Graham.

Lombardo specified Sunday that he supports laws that require parents to be notified if a minor is having an abortion and legislation to require a waiting period between consultation and abortion. He said he does not support mandatory ultrasounds. 

A state law allows abortions up to 24 weeks into pregnancy. Lombardo said “there’s nothing the governor can do” to change that law. 

Sisolak scoffed at a question about whether he supports abortions at 28, 30 or 32 weeks. He said it was a “volatile” question to ask, given that the vast majority of abortions occur before 21 weeks, and called it “political theater.” 

CRIME AND PUBLIC SAFETY

Sisolak has the final say on criminal justice bills that come out of Carson City. Lombardo implements those laws in Clark County.

Lombardo said crime decreased for six years there but has climbed in the last two years, which he blamed on a Democratic-controlled state government that has passed “soft-on-crime legislation,” including a law that raised the dollar amount for a theft to be considered a felony from $650 to $1,200 and increased the weight of drugs that qualify for felony trafficking. 

Debate moderator Jon Ralston, CEO of the Nevada Independent, noted that Lombardo’s sheriff’s department was neutral on the bill. Lombardo said his department had to compromise, “knowing that it was still bad legislation.”

Ralston noted that Sisolak once called Lombardo the “best sheriff in America.” But Sisolak said Lombardo’s policies have changed as he sought the governor’s office.

“People are not safer today than they were eight years ago,” when Lombardo became sheriff, he said. “I met with a roundtable of local businesses, who told me one of the main problems they have is burglary. They can’t get (Las Vegas police) to even respond to burglary because it’s so far down on their list.”

Lombardo said that was “absolutely false,” and that criminal justice reforms mean police have more burglaries to respond to. 

ECONOMY

The Democratic governor defended his decision to close nonessential businesses at the start of the pandemic. He said he remembered looking at the Las Vegas Strip and “knowing that if I signed this executive order I’m gonna shut down the Strip, (and) put 250,000 people out of work.”

“Those lives were more important to me,” said Sisolak, who is endorsed by the Nevada Chamber of Commerce. “The economy came back. Those lives we could never regain. There’s 11,051 empty seats at Thanksgiving or Christmas dinner right now.”

Lombardo has criticized the longevity of school and business closures and Sisolak’s determinations about which businesses were essential, calling it “too draconian.”

“We didn’t have to be a beta agency or a beta state or a beta department. You can rely on what other people are doing in other states that were showing success,” he said. “I believe the governor just solely relied on what (California Gov.) Gavin Newsom advised him.”

EDUCATION

Lombardo and Sisolak both said they support raising teacher pay. Lombardo said he would back a raise tied to the Consumer Price Index of around 2-3%, but said the exact amount would be negotiated. Sisolak said he would increase starting teacher pay and negotiate raises “north of 3%.”

The sheriff said he would restore a provision in Nevada’s “Read by Grade 3” program that holds back third graders who don’t read at grade level, and supports an expansion of charter schools, which teachers’ unions oppose.

Lombardo, like other Republicans, strongly supports voucher programs that provide public money for students to attend private schools, and said parents should have options besides “failing schools.”

Nevada has long placed near the bottom of national education rankings. The Clark County School District, with 326,000 students, is the fifth in size nationally and has weathered staff shortages. Lombardo has indicated he would consider breaking up CCSD.

Sisolak said the state can’t afford to drain funding from the cash-strapped public school system, noting that private schools “don’t have to take the students that are more expensive to teach,” such as those with learning disabilities or English learners. 

Copyright © 2022 The Washington Times, LLC.

Hughes wins Sanderson Farms with birdie on second playoff hole

sanderson farms golf 33725 c0 0 3998

JACKSON, Miss. — Whether it was sheer confidence or remarkable resilience, Mackenzie Hughes never doubted he would win the Sanderson Farms Championship. He just never imagined how it would unfold Sunday evening.

Hughes had to make six key putts on the final seven holes — four of them for par — to outlast Sepp Straka on the second playoff hole for his second PGA Tour victory.

“The second one felt a lot harder than the first one, that’s for sure,” Hughes said.

The 31-year-old Canadian renowned for his putter finally made birdie his third time playing the 18th hole at the Country Club of Jackson, pouring in an 8-footer for the win.

But this was as much about pars — the 15-footer on the par-5 14th, the 7-foot putt on the 16th after he couldn’t reach the green from a fairway bunker, and two tough par saves on the 18th hole from 100 feet behind the green in regulation and from a bunker on the first playoff hole.

“I kept telling myself the whole week that I was going to do it. That was the only thing I saw in my mind,” Hughes said. “Those par saves down the stretch, I was just trying to will the ball into the hole.”

The first par save on the 18th gave him a 3-under 69 to force a playoff against Straka, who played two groups ahead of Hughes and shot 67 to post at 17-under 271.

On the second playoff hole, Straka missed from 18 feet on the fringe before Hughes made the winning putt. It was the second time in his last four tournaments that Straka lost in a playoff. The other was against Will Zalatoris at the start of the PGA Tour postseason.

“I played good golf on a tough Sunday,” said Straka, who picked up his first PGA Tour title earlier this year at the Honda Classic. “Giving yourself chances to win out here it key. The more you can do that, the more comfortable you’ll be.”

For Hughes, it had been six years since his lone victory — also in a playoff — at Sea Island.

“I was fighting like hell to stay in it,” Hughes said. “Finishing second, while it’s still great, it kind of stings when you’re that close. I just wasn’t going to accept that today.”

The victory comes one week after the Presidents Cup, and Hughes was disappointed not to be included on the International team at Quail Hollow in Charlotte, North Carolina, where he lives. He wanted to use that as motivation, and it sure worked out that way.

Garrick Higgo of South Africa had a 68 and finished third.

Straka took the lead by getting up-and-down for birdie on the par-5 14th and the reachable par-4 15th. He had to settle for pars the rest of the day.

Hughes had those scoring holes still to play, and he nearly squandered the chance. On the 14th, he was out of position off the tee, his wedge over a tree back toward the fairway came up short in a bunker, he had to lay up again and escaped with a 15-foot par putt.

On the closing hole, he was well left off the tee and punched under a tree and over the green against the grandstand. After free relief, he used putter from 100 feet away off the green with perfect pace to 3 feet for.

On the first playoff hole at the 18th, Hughes came up short in a bunker with only about 15 feet from the edge of the bunker to the pin. He blasted out to 5 feet and made par.

That sent them back to the 18th for a third time, and Hughes closed him out.

Mark Hubbard, who went into the final round with a one-shot lead, managed only two birdies in his round of 74 and tied for fifth.

The final round featured five players who had at least a share of the lead at some point. That included Emiliano Grillo of Argentina, whose round came undone on the par-5 14th when he took a triple bogey without a penalty shot.

Higgo never was part of the lead, though he lingered the entire day and missed an 8-foot birdie putt on the 17th that ultimately kept him out of the playoff.

Copyright © 2022 The Washington Times, LLC.

Penalties doom Commanders against Cowboys

Commanders Cowboys Football 68719.jpg 56085 c0 205 4921

ARLINGTON, TEXAS — Benjamin St-Juste lept up to pick off the pass from Cowboys quarterback Cooper Rush. But before the Commanders cornerback could even celebrate, there was a flag on the ground. Illegal contact. Defense. No. 25. 

Rush’s interception — St-Juste’s takeaway — was taken away. Just like that. 

“It’s tough, man,” said St-Juste, who was called for impeding receiver Noah Brown.

St-Juste’s penalty was one of 11 on the Commanders in Sunday’s 25-10 loss to the Dallas Cowboys, an area that proved to be a huge difference in the loss. The flags cost Washington 136 yards, gave the Cowboys four first downs and wiped out two would-be interceptions. Later in the game, Kam Curl’s takeaway was also negated: William Jackson III was called for holding. 

How damaging were the penalties? After St-Juste’s illegal contact, for instance, the Cowboys went on to score their first touchdown of the game — and retake the lead from Washington. The Commanders had just engineered their best drive of the day with a Carson Wentz touchdown throw to Jahan Dotson. The Cowboys answered with a 15-play, 75-yard drive that ended with a Rush touchdown to Michael Gallup. 

The score gave the Cowboys a 12-7 lead, which they took into halftime.

“I’m disappointed for the most part,” Commanders coach Ron Rivera said. “Certain penalties are concentration focused. … We’ve got to sit in there and we’ve got to be disciplined. That’s something that we as coaches got to make sure gets corrected. That was not good enough. 

“We hurt ourselves and took ourselves out of certain opportunities.”

The penalties weren’t just on the defense. Far from it. Too often, the Commanders would wipe away positive offensive plays with back-breaking penalties that squandered offensive drives. 

No sequence better encapsulated this than quarterback Carson Wentz’s intentional grounding in the third quarter. Down 15-7, technically a one-score game, the Commanders had broken into the Cowboys’ red zone. But on the very next snap, pressure had gotten to Wentz — who made a desperate attempt to throw it away rather than take the sack. 

There was a problem, however: The referees determined no receiver was in the area. The Commanders went from second-and-8 to third-and-22. 

Then, to make matters worse, tackle Sam Cosmi was called for a false start. Third-and-27.

The Commanders picked up on a chunk of yards and settled for a 45-yard field goal. Opportunity wasted.

“You can’t get away with shooting yourself in the foot like that and it definitely cost us,” Wentz said. 

Wentz actually had two intentional grounding penalties. He was called earlier in the game for one after his pass failed to clear the line of scrimmage. On that particular play, the quarterback appeared to hold the ball for way too long as he likely could have thrown it away before he was on his way to the ground. 

The penalties were part of a rough day for Wentz, who also had two interceptions and threw for just 170 yards. The quarterback was hit a total of 11 times, a week after he was sacked nine times against the Philadelphia Eagles, his former team. 

On defense, Jackson’s penalties also hurt. Even more so than the interception that was taken away, Jackson was whistled for pass interference that helped the Cowboys gain 38 yards. Jackson appeared in position to make the play, but used too much contact with Gallup before the ball arrived. 

That error moved Dallas into scoring territory. Two plays later, Rush hit wide receiver CeeDee Lamb for a 30-yard touchdown. On that play, Jackson said he expected help from safety over the top and played outside leverage — only there was no safety. The Cowboys had drawn Washington’s other defensive back away from the area, Jackson said. 

Defensive tackle Jonathan Allen, meanwhile, expressed frustration at the discrepancy in calls. The Cowboys finished with only four penalties for 20 yards. 

“The officiating was horrible,” Allen said. “But that’s not the reason we lost. It helped, but that’s not the reason we lost. We have to do better as a team.” 

Da Silva, Bolsonaro head to runoff in Brazil’s presidential race

Brazil Elections 27288.jpg d8316 c0 254 6095

The top two candidates in Brazil’s presidential election, leftist former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and right-wing incumbent Jair Bolsonaro, are headed for a runoff after neither won Sunday’s crowded contest outright.

The runoff will pit Mr. Bolsonaro, a regulation-slashing firebrand who has been called Brazil’s version of Donald Trump, against his political nemesis, Mr. da Silva, head of the Workers’ Party.

Nine other candidates were in the race, but their support paled compared with Mr. Bolsonaro and Mr. da Silva.

With 98.8% of votes counted, Mr. da Silva had 48.1%, ahead of Mr. Bolsonaro with 43.5%, according to the electoral authority.

In Brazil, the winning candidate must take more than 50% of the vote or the two front-runners will face off in a second round of voting.

Polling data on Saturday from the Brazilian firm Datafolha showed a commanding lead for Mr. da Silva. The pollsters said 50% of the respondents said they would vote for the former president, compared with 36% who were inclined to return Mr. Bolsonaro to power.

The election is widely considered the most important in years. It is a crucial moment for Brazil, which has been racked by rising fuel prices and an economic slowdown.

Some analysts predicted that Mr. da Silva would be unable to hit the 50% mark required to avoid an Oct. 30 runoff with Mr. Bolsonaro.

“I think what’s more likely is that there will be a second round,” Brazilian political columnist Jose Roberto de Toledo told The Guardian. “If there is a second round, it will be much worse than it has been thus far. It would mean four weeks of gore. I hope I’m wrong.”

Mr. Bolsonaro promised Brazilians that he would create jobs by slashing red tape, cutting taxes and investing in technology. He has faced withering criticism over his administration’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil and for extensive erosion of the Amazon rainforest.

If returned to office, Mr. Bolsonaro said, he will continue privatizing public companies and increasing mining opportunities. He has stated that Brazil, like any other country, has the right to use its natural resources. He also promised to continue sending $110 monthly checks to Brazilians for pandemic aid.

Mr. da Silva, a former union leader, was Brazil’s president from 2003 to 2010. It was a time of relative economic prosperity. He was jailed as part of a wide-ranging corruption investigation, but the dismissal of his conviction allowed him to make another bid for elective office.

Mr. da Silva promised to raise taxes on the wealthy, enact generous social programs and bring back environmental regulations that Mr. Bolsonaro’s administration has relaxed.

Mr. Bolsonaro has portrayed himself as a defender of traditional family values and personal liberties and a foe of political correctness and other liberal policies. Manuel Pintoadinho, a metalworker living in Rio de Janeiro, told NPR that he intended to cast his ballot for Mr. Bolsonaro even though the economy has been rough.

“The pandemic ruined everything. Inflation is really high,” Mr. Pintoadinho said. “It’s not his fault.”

Holding an election on a single day for 150 million people across a country the size of a continent is not a simple task, said Oliver Stuenkel, a professor in the school of international relations at Brazil’s Fundacao Getulio Vargas in Sao Paulo.

“It is a tremendous logistical challenge, and pulling it all off so seamlessly should be a source of national pride,” Mr. Stuenkel said in a message on Twitter.

He rejected Mr. Bolsonaro’s doubts about the fairness of the election. He said recent comments could cause millions of citizens to question the results and deny the legitimacy of the next government.

“The quality of a country’s democracy not only depends on its government. It also depends on the opposition,” Mr. Stuenkel said. “A democratic opposition provides constructive criticism and holds the government accountable. It should not, however, question the legitimacy of the government.”