Home Blog Page 1869

Biden calls fight for democracy the world’s ‘defining challenge’

Biden 28257.jpg 2830e c0 0 5612

President Biden called on more than 100 world leaders gathered for the opening of his “Summit for Democracy” on Thursday to stand together in battling a “backward slide of rights and democracy” in the face of rising authoritarianism around the world.

“We stand at an inflection point in our history,” the president said.

Mr. Biden wants to make the two-day virtual summit a focal point of his administration’s global messaging at a moment of growing concern about the influence of nondemocratic governments such as communist China, autocratic Russia and theocratic Iran.

Some major U.S. allies were left off the invitation list. Regardless, Mr. Biden seized the moment to try to project American leadership to strengthen democracy and demonstrate its worth in a changing world. With Russian and Chinese diplomats questioning the premise of the summit, a full day of breakout sessions and panel discussions left many wondering whether all the talk will lead to action.

Still, Mr. Biden said, “This is the defining challenge of our time.”

“We’re bringing together leaders from more than 100 governments alongside activists, trade unionists and other members of civil society … not to assert that any one of our democracies is perfect or has all the answers, but to lock arms and reaffirm our shared commitment to make our democracies better,” he said.

The goal of the vast virtual gathering, Mr. Biden said, is to “share ideas and learn from each other and to make concrete commitments of how — how to strengthen our own democracies and push back on authoritarianism, fight corruption, promote and protect human rights of people everywhere.

“To act,” he added for emphasis, “to act.”

The message appeared to resonate among the leaders.

Others took turns delivering remarks, many prerecorded, on the state of democracy. The messages often reflected on the stress on their nations of rapidly evolving technology. They also bemoaned the increase in disinformation campaigns to undermine representative institutions and elections.

“The democratic conversation is changing,” said Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen. “New technologies and large tech companies are increasingly setting the stage for the democratic dialogue, sometimes with more emphasis on reach than on freedom of speech.”

Such concerns are widespread. Several democracy activist groups used the summit to pitch analyses of the struggling state of democracy in the world, including the U.S.

The International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance said in its annual report that the number of countries experiencing democratic backsliding “has never been as high” as in the past decade. The U.S. was added to the list alongside India and Brazil.

Some say the administration is projecting a domestic problem — vicious political divisions challenging American democracy from within — onto the international stage.

Mr. Biden made no specific reference to Russia or China, although he wasted little time before speaking about American efforts for racial and gender justice and equality, voting rights and laborers’ rights to organize.

“Here in the United States, we know as well as anyone that renewing our democracy and strengthening our democratic institutions requires constant effort,” the president said.

Some perceived the reference to “renewing” democracy as an attempt to stoke fervor around the notion that President Trump oversaw a major decline in democracy, underscored by demonstrators’ Jan. 6 storming of the U.S. Capitol.

In closing remarks on the first day of the summit, Vice President Kamala Harris said “Jan. 6 looms large in our collective conscience.”

“Here in the United States, we know that our democracy is not immune from threats,” said Ms. Harris. She said “anti-voter laws that many states have passed are part of an intentional effort to exclude Americans from participating in our democracy.”

Invitation politics

Some foreign leaders whose countries weren’t invited have expressed frustration. Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto dismissed the summit as a “domestic political-type of event” where leaders with a good relationship with Mr. Trump were not invited.

However, the criteria for the invitation list have been anything but clear-cut. Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, who was invited, built a close relationship with Mr. Trump but has yet to even talk by telephone with Mr. Biden. Bangladesh, Singapore, Hungary, and even NATO ally Turkey were not on the list.

The White House has been tight-lipped while observers speculate about snubbing nations for leaning toward authoritarianism while including others for strategic reasons.

Some analysts say the summit can already claim some significant successes. “Like any good dinner party, who gets invited usually determines the quality of the evening and the mood for future such gatherings,” said Ted Piccone, a nonresident senior fellow with the Brookings Institution.

“In the case of the Summit for Democracy, if the heads of state and government of some 112 countries (including the United States) bring to the meal some honest recognition of their shortcomings (humble pie), along with concrete pledges for reform and cooperation (the main course), the convening would have been worth the effort,” Mr. Piccone wrote on the liberal think tank’s website this week.

Mr. Biden called the summit a critical moment for leaders to redouble their efforts to bolster democracies. He has repeatedly said the U.S. and like-minded allies need to show the world that democracy is a far better vehicle for societies than autocracy.

That is a central tenet of Mr. Biden’s foreign policy outlook, which he promised would be more outward-looking than Mr. Trump’s “America First” approach. In his remarks, the president announced he was starting an initiative to spend up to $424 million for programming around the world that supports independent media, anti-corruption work and more.

The gathering drew expected backlash from chief U.S. adversaries and other nations that were not invited.

Chinese officials accused the White House of using the summit to ratchet up Cold War-style tensions with Beijing. “This year marks the 30th anniversary of the end of the Cold War,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin told reporters this week. “The U.S. hosting of the summit for democracy is a dangerous move to rekindle the Cold War mentality, to which the international community should be on high alert.”

Ahead of the summit, the ambassadors to the U.S. from China and Russia wrote a joint essay saying the Biden administration is exhibiting a “Cold-War mentality” that will “stoke up ideological confrontation and a rift in the world.”

Mr. Biden is pressing Russian President Vladimir Putin to stand down after a massive buildup of troops on the Ukrainian border, creating growing concern in Washington and European capitals that Russia will again invade the former Soviet state. Mr. Biden said Wednesday that he warned Mr. Putin in a Tuesday video call of “severe consequences” of an invasion.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who participated in Thursday’s summit and later spoke by phone with Mr. Biden, said in a post on Twitter, “Democracy is not a given, it must be fought for.”

Polish President Andrzej Duda also spoke out against Russia. In his address, he decried Moscow’s support of Belarus. Poland and Western allies have accused Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko of using migrants as pawns to destabilize the 27-nation European Union in retaliation for its sanctions on his authoritarian regime.

• This article is based in part on wire service reports.

China’s surveillance tech is a global threat to religious freedom, former U.S. envoy Brownback says

huawei lawsuit dismissed 08596 c0 208 5000

Sam Brownback, the former U.S. envoy for international religious freedom during the Trump administration, said Wednesday that China’s use of high-tech tools to repress its religious minorities will lead to more authoritarian crackdowns around the globe.

Mr. Brownback, a former Kansas governor who also represented the state in the U.S. Senate, described China as “a nation that is authoritarian, and that’s currently conducting a genocide” against Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang province.

China’s communist government has in recent years also taken actions against independent Christian churches, as well as practitioners of the Falun Gong movement.

The religious liberty advocate said China is “the leading nation in the world to oppress religious freedom. And it’s using the latest technology to do it that they’re going to share” with other authoritarian regimes.

Mr. Brownback spoke as the 73rd anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations on Dec. 10, 1948, approached. That document, spearheaded by former U.S. first lady Eleanor Roosevelt, guaranteed a number of individual rights, including, under Article 18, religious liberty.

Its text reads, “Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.”

Asked where the U.S. and other Western nations went wrong on protecting religious freedoms, Mr. Brownback replied, “I think we really let China just run roughshod. We all were lulled to sleep thinking, ‘Oh, they’ll mature into democracy. And then all this will just be a bad dream.’ It turned out to be what they were [at their] core and what they were about.”

Mr. Brownback said middle America views the Chinese government as “an evil regime,” and wants “to separate our economy from the Chinese Communist Party economy.”

He praised the Biden administration for maintaining sanctions placed on China by the Trump administration — and adding new ones. 

Mr. Brownback said the United States — which this week said its diplomats would boycott the 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing — must continue to show resolve.

“I think we’ve just got to ‘set our face like flint’ to quote a biblical phrase, and just say, ‘We’re going to go back into a Cold War setting [as] we did against the Soviet Union for years,’” Mr. Brownback said.

Americans need the will, he said, “to confront China directly on human rights issues, on their economic espionage and theft of our technology.”

Katrina Lantos Swett, a former chair of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom who heads the Tom Lantos Human Rights Foundation, said Thursday that Mr. Brownback is “100% correct” when it comes to China.

“We need to recognize that China is aggressively seeking to become the world’s premier superpower,” Ms. Swett said in a telephone interview. “And they’re advancing this agenda on multiple fronts,” she added.

Ms. Swett, who co-chaired the 2021 International Religious Freedom event in Washington with Mr. Brownback, said they have a common human rights goal in relation to China.

“We are committed to exposing and confronting the pernicious influence of China‘s brazen and shameless trampling of human rights, the religious freedom rights of all of their citizens,” she said.

Gig Worker Protections Get a Push in European Proposal

09eu gigworkers facebookJumbo

Last year, gig economy companies staged a successful referendum campaign in California to keep drivers classified as independent contractors while giving them limited benefits. Although a judge ruled in August that the result violated California’s Constitution, his decision is being appealed, and the companies are pursuing similar legislation in Massachusetts.

The Biden administration has suggested that gig workers should be treated as employees, but it has not taken significant steps to change employment laws. In May, the Labor Department reversed a Trump-era rule that would have made it more difficult to reclassify gig workers in the country as employees.

In Europe, Spain offers a preview of the potential effects of the E.U. proposal. The country’s so-called Riders Law, enacted in August, required food delivery services such as Uber and Deliveroo to reclassify workers as employees, covering an estimated 30,000 workers.

Uber responded by hiring several staffing agencies to hire a fleet of drivers for Uber Eats, a strategy to comply with the law but avoid responsibility for managing thousands of people directly. Deliveroo, which is partly owned by Amazon, abandoned the Spanish market.

The companies prefer policies like those in France, where the government has proposed allowing workers to elect union representation that could negotiate with companies on issues like wages and benefits. Uber also pointed to Italy, where a major union and food delivery companies struck a deal that guarantees a minimum wage, insurance and safety equipment, but does not classify the workers as employees.

Kim van Sparrentak, a Green lawmaker in the European Parliament who helped draft a report on platform workers that was published this year, praised the commission’s proposal as “quite radical.”

“It can set a new standard for workers’ rights,” Ms. Van Sparrentak said.

Adam Satariano reported from London, and Elian Peltier from Brussels. Kate Conger contributed reporting.

Why Apps Suddenly Want to Protect Kids

09ontech kidsonline still facebookJumbo v3

But most advocates for children believe the guidelines are a thoughtful approach to remodeling the internet for potentially vulnerable young people. “We definitely are fans,” James P. Steyer, the chief executive of Common Sense Media, told me.

Why has this spread globally?

To comply with the British code, Facebook, Google and other companies could have changed features only for kids who live in that country. But practically and philosophically, that might have been a bad choice.

There is growing support among lawmakers and tech executives for different features and safeguards to protect children from sexual predators, inappropriate content, bullying and other risks from being online.

Internet companies know that more regulations like Britain’s are most likely coming, so it may be prudent to act of their own accord. “I think they can see the writing on the wall,” Sonia Livingstone, a professor at the London School of Economics who studies children’s digital rights, told Wired this year.

What is Washington doing?

Members of Congress are deliberating potential updates to the U.S. law for comprehensive online child protection, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act. The 1990s law compelled most popular online services in the U.S. to bar users who are younger than 13. But we know that many American kids are online with or without their parents’ permission. The question now is what more could or should be done to help make them safer online.

In a video from The New York Times Opinion section, my colleagues made the case that Congress should copy the British regulations. Some U.S. lawmakers have essentially proposed that. “Why not here?” Senator Richard Blumenthal, Democrat of Connecticut, asked at Wednesday’s hearing, referring to the British code.

The British regulations are effectively here already, but without the force of U.S. law. Steyer said he was frustrated that Congress hadn’t yet passed new child safety laws but believed they would be coming very soon. “2022 is going to be very important here for tech legislation and regulation,” he said.

Joe Biden’s ‘broadband equity’ spending moves toward internet rate regs, feds to set low-cost plans

Biden Democracy Summit 37618.jpg 886f3 c0 0 3753

President Biden’s $65 billion program to extend broadband to poor urban and rural communities comes with a catch: Cable providers have to slash prices for the service.

Critics say it is the first step toward government price controls for the internet.

The broadband initiative in the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure plan that Mr. Biden signed into law last month wasn’t particularly controversial, garnering bipartisan support for bringing broadband to areas with subpar internet service.

But conservatives sounded alarms about requiring companies who pocket the taxpayer funds to offer customers a low-cost option, albeit possibly at slower speeds.

The low-cost plan must be cheaper than what the government determines is the price of regular plans, according to the new law.

“That’s the definition of government intrusion. Instead of letting the market set prices, we’re going to set them,” said Andrew Long, a senior fellow at The Free State Foundation, a free market tech policy think tank.

The Biden administration called the program “broadband equity.”

The decision about whether the rates are low enough will be made by the federal government, namely the National Telecommunications and Information Agency. The agency is currently headed by Evelyn Remaley, the acting Commerce Department assistant secretary of communications and information and acting NTIA administrator.

Under the program, the broadband money will go to states who will dole it out. The states also will make the initial determination of whether low-cost plans are cheap enough and if companies can offer slower speeds for those plans.

But it’s NTIA that will have the final say. Ms. Remaley would be able to rule that companies have to lower their prices even more if they want broadband money.

The federal oversight could help align rates charged from state to state, said Greg Guice, government affairs director for Public Knowledge, a left-of-center advocacy group that advocates for greater regulation of the broadband industry.

“Five southern states could decide to offer people internet service for $30 a month,” he said. “But if another state’s proposal was $70. NTIA could say, ‘Hold up, that seems a little high compared to the other states.’”

To Mr. Guice, the mandate will make it easier for more customers to be able to afford internet service at a time when the pandemic has illustrated how essential it is to be able to get online to go to school or see a doctor.

NCTA — The Internet & Television Association, the cable industry’s main lobbying group, is staying silent on the requirement.

Pushing companies to charge less than they want could backfire, however. Not only could it reduce research companies do to improve broadband service, but it could also hurt their incentive to offer broadband in more areas, according to economists.

Despite the concerns about the broadband program, the infrastructure package received the support of 19 Republicans in the Senate and 13 in the House.

Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, who was among the Republicans who negotiated the broadband portion of the infrastructure deal, did not respond to a request for comment.

Biden administration is taking other steps to exert more government control over the internet industry.

Having failed to get bipartisan support to include other progressive ideas for lowering prices in the infrastructure package, federal agencies have just gone ahead and implemented them as regulations.

Mr. Biden’s infrastructure wishlist released in March included a plan to prioritize municipalities and nonprofits such as farm cooperatives for receiving broadband funds — an idea that NCTA and other critics said would lead to spending taxpayer dollars on poorer-quality government-run broadband.

Progressives argued that access to high-speed internet has become essential to modern life and should be treated as a public utility. Having more cities and towns offer broadband would create more competition and force companies to lower their rates, they said.

The final package did not prioritize municipalities but simply made them eligible for the funds. Undeterred, the Treasury Department in September said that states, U.S. territories and tribes receiving a share of the $3.9 billion for broadband in the American Rescue Plan are expected to use the money in projects involving local governments and nonprofits.

Treasury did not respond to requests for comment.

The Free State Foundation’s Mr. Long objected to the department moving ahead despite the lack of bipartisan agreement, calling city-run broadband a “risky venture” because local governments don’t have the expertise to run broadband service.

The Agriculture Department followed in October. The agency gave states and companies preferential treatment in applying for funding in the ReConnect rural broadband program if they involved local governments in running the service and by offering a low-cost plan.

NCTA spokesman Brian Dietz said it “gives some organizations an unfair advantage which could have the effect of taking the most qualified broadband providers off the field when the end goal should be to build and deliver the best broadband service to all consumers.”

The department, he said, is “setting up ReConnect to fail in the mission of accomplishing universal broadband service across the U.S.”

An Agriculture Department spokesperson said the department wanted to create “an incentive to get the local population more involved in delivery of the broadband solution.”

Oriole Park to test artificial intelligence security product

virus outbreak opening day photo gallery 47677 c0 195 4681

BALTIMORE (AP) — Oriole Park at Camden Yards will test a new security technology during the upcoming baseball season that uses 3D imaging and artificial intelligence to detect concealed weapons.

The Maryland Stadium Authority announced Tuesday the ballpark will try out a walk-through portal called Hexwave that can screen 1,000 people an hour, The Baltimore Sun reported.

Developed by a Massachusetts Institute of Technology lab, the product could make security checks faster by reducing the need to empty pockets and conduct bag checks or pat downs.

The stadium authority owns and manages Oriole Park and M&T Bank Stadium, home of the Baltimore Ravens. It signed a memo of understanding with Liberty Defense Holdings, which licenses the technology, to test Hexwave for a to-be-determined period during the 2022 season.

Vice President of Safety and Security Vernon J. Conaway Jr. said the authority is “extremely confident” in its existing security measures. He said participating in the trial will test an emerging technology that could enhance the current system.

The product can – unlike metal detectors – sense non-metal weapons such as ghost guns, 3D-printed guns or liquid and plastic explosives. It’s similar to body scanners used at most airports but operates at a lower frequency, Liberty Defense’s CEO Bill Frain told the newspaper. He said the technology does not pose any health risks or privacy issues.

Frain said due to the COVID-19 pandemic, “people are getting used to further detection, further examination before they’re going into an event.”

“Unfortunately,” he said, “we have incidents like the Michigan school shooting, and these things continue to happen at places where you wouldn’t expect.”

Hexwave, which has been in development for five years, was first beta tested at a Liberty Defense facility in Atlanta and at its Massachusetts headquarters. Frain said trials will also be conducted at an international airport, a police department, a port and a university. He did not identify specific locations.

The company is aiming to launch the product commercially late next year.

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC.

Here’s Why Inflation Is Worrying Washington

09dc inflation01 facebookJumbo

Aquan Brunson, 45 and from Brooklyn, used to buy three slices of cheese pizza from 99 Cents Pizza of Utica for lunch each day. But about three months ago, inflation ate away that third slice. The shop has pasted over its old sign to alert customers that it is now “$1.50 Hot Pizza.”

“The dollar doesn’t take us far,” said Mr. Brunson, patting his greasy lunch down with paper napkins on a gray December afternoon. “The cost of everything is going up.”

Consumers across the country can tell you that inflation has been high this year, evidenced by more expensive used cars, pricier furniture and the ongoing demise of New York City’s famous dollar slice. But until recently, policymakers in Washington responded to it with a common refrain: Rapid price increases were likely to be transitory.

Last week, policymakers said it was time to retire the label “transitory,” and acknowledged that the price increases have been proving more persistent than expected.

Jerome H. Powell, the Fed chair, said that while his basic expectation is that price gains will cool off, there’s a growing threat that they won’t do so soon or sufficiently.

“I think the risk of higher inflation has increased,” he said.

A fresh report set for release on Friday is expected to reinforce that concern. The Consumer Price Index could show that inflation picked up by 6.8 percent over the past year, the fastest pace in nearly 40 years. More worrisome for the Fed is that inflation is broadening to many products and services, not just those directly affected by the supply chain woes that have driven up prices for cars and electronics.

Here is a rundown about what to know about the price pops sweeping America and the world — and what to expect when new U.S. consumer price inflation figures are released on Friday.

When economists and policymakers talk about “inflation,” they typically mean the increase in prices for the things that people buy out of pocket — tracked by the Consumer Price Index, or C.P.I. — or the change in the cost of things that people consume either out of pocket or through government payments and insurance, which is tracked by the less-timely Personal Consumption Expenditures index.

Both measures are way up this year, and C.P.I. data set for release on Friday is expected to show that inflation picked up by the most since 1982. Back then, Paul Volcker was the Fed chair, and he was waging a war on years of rapid price gains by pushing interest rates to double digits to cripple business and consumer demand and cool off the economy. Today, interest rates are set at near-zero after policymakers slashed borrowing costs at the beginning of the pandemic.

There are plenty of differences between 1982 and today. Inflation had been low for years leading up to 2021, and pandemic-era lockdowns and the subsequent reopening are behind much of the current price pop.

Consumer demand surged just as rolling factory shutdowns and a reshuffle in spending to goods from services caused manufacturing backlogs and overwhelmed ports. That’s why policymakers were comfortable dismissing high inflation for a while: It came from kinks that seemed likely to eventually work themselves out.

But price gains are increasingly coming from sectors with a less clear-cut, obviously temporary pandemic tieback. Rents, which make up a big chunk of inflation, are rising at a solid clip.

“Housing — that is the key broadening,” said Laura Rosner, an economist at MacroPolicy Perspectives.

The potential for wider and more lasting price pressures have put Fed officials on edge. Policymakers at the central bank, who had been slowly tiptoeing away from supporting the economy, broadcast clearly last week that they are preparing to speed up the retreat.

“They know this report is coming,” Ms. Rosner said of Friday’s anticipated number. “It’s going to confirm and explain why we’ve seen such a sharp shift.”

Disruptions to the global flow of goods are not fading as quickly as policymakers had hoped. Additional virus waves have kept factories from running at full speed in Asia and elsewhere. Shipping routes are clogged, and consumers are still buying goods at a robust pace, adding to backlogs and making it hard for the situation to normalize.

Households have some $2.5 trillion in excess savings, thanks in part to pandemic-era stimulus, which could help to keep them buying home gym equipment and new coffee tables well into next year.

“The earliest we see things normalizing is really the end of 2022,” said Phil Levy, chief economist at the logistics firm FlexPort. When it comes to misunderstanding inflation, he said, “part of the problem is that we treated the supply chain like it was a special category, like food or energy.”

But as 2021 has made inescapably clear, the global economy is a delicately balanced system. Take the car industry: Virus-spurred semiconductor factory shutdowns in Taiwan delayed new car production. Given the dearth of new autos, rental car companies had to compete with consumers for previously owned vehicles, leaving shortages on used car lots. The chain reaction pushed prices higher at every link along the way.

Global snarls have also helped to push up food prices, as Abdul Batin, owner of 99 Cents Pizza of Utica, can attest. He plans to rebrand it as “$1.50 Pizza of Utica,” and explains that while some customers balked at the cost increase, he couldn’t help it.

“Everything is going up right now — cheese, flour, even the soda price,” he said.

Another thing that could keep inflation high? Wages are climbing swiftly, and some companies have begun to talk about passing those rising expenses onto customers, who seem willing and able to pay more. The Employment Cost Index, a measure the Fed watches closely, picked up notably in the three-month period that ended in September.

The risk is that this is an early, and still dim, echo of the kind of wage-and-price dynamic that helped to fuel higher prices in the 1970s and 1980s. Back then, unions were a much more powerful force, and they helped to make sure pay kept up with rising prices. Inflation and wage gains pushed each other into an upward spiral, to the point that price increases leapt out of control and demanded a Fed response.

In the years since, workers have typically had less formalized bargaining power. But employers are contending with labor shortages as the virus keeps many would-be employees on the sidelines and as demand booms. That is giving workers the ability to command higher pay as they face climbing costs themselves, and it is prompting many employers to lift wages to compete for scarce talent. That could keep demand solid by bolstering peoples’ wherewithal to spend.

“Looking ahead, businesses across all major sectors foresee continued widespread wage hikes,” the New York Fed reported in its section of the Fed’s Beige Book, an anecdotal survey of business and labor contacts carried out by regional Fed banks.

In Atlanta’s region, the Beige Book noted, “several contacts mentioned that labor costs were already being passed along to consumers with little resistance, while others said plans were underway to do so.”

Mr. Brunson — the pizza aficionado — works at a grocery store. They’ve raised his pay, he said, but it is not enough to keep up with climbing cost of food and other expenses.

“They gave us an extra dollar, but that’s just to offset the inflation,” he said. He and his family, three adult children who live with him, are coping by cutting back. “No eating out, less food, less meat.”

FDA expands Pfizer COVID booster, opens extra dose to age 16

ye tv moments 14142 c0 125 3000

The U.S. is expanding COVID-19 boosters, ruling that 16- and 17-year-olds can get a third dose of Pfizer’s vaccine.

The U.S. and many other nations already were urging adults to get booster shots to pump up immunity that can wane months after vaccination, calls that intensified with the discovery of the worrisome new omicron variant.

On Thursday, the Food and Drug Administration gave emergency authorization for 16- and 17-year-olds to get a third dose of the vaccine made by Pfizer and its partner BioNTech — if it’s been six months since their last shot.

There’s one more step: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention must formally recommend the boosters for this age group and a decision is expected soon.

The Pfizer vaccine is the only option in the U.S. for anyone younger than 18, either for initial vaccination or for use as a booster. It’s not yet clear if or when teens younger than 16 might need a third Pfizer dose.

Vaccinations for children as young as 5 just began last month, using special low-dose Pfizer shots. By this week, about 5 million 5- to 11-year-olds had gotten a first dose.

The extra-contagious delta variant is causing nearly all COVID-19 infections in the U.S., and in much of the world. It’s not yet clear how vaccines will hold up against the new and markedly different omicron mutant. But there’s strong evidence that boosters offer a jump in protection against delta-caused infections, currently the biggest threat.

Complicating the decision to extend boosters to 16- and 17-year-olds is that the Pfizer shot — and a similar vaccine made by Moderna — have been linked to a rare side effect. Called myocarditis, it’s a type of heart inflammation seen mostly in younger men and teen boys.

Health officials in Israel, which already gives boosters to teens, have said the side effect continues to be rare with third doses.

A U.S. study this week offered additional reassurance. Researchers from children’s hospitals around the country checked medical records and found the rare side effect usually is mild and people recover quickly, while COVID-19 itself can cause more serious heart inflammation. The research was published Monday in the journal Circulation.

For more information, visit The Washington Times COVID-19 resource page.

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC.

Health, The New York Today

Reality TV’s Josh Duggar convicted of child porn possession; he faces decades in prison

josh duggar child pornography 74090 c0 109 585

FAYETTEVILLE, Ark. (AP) — A federal jury in Arkansas on Thursday convicted former reality TV star Josh Duggar of downloading and possessing child pornography.

The jury in Fayetteville, about 140 miles (225 kilometers) northwest of Little Rock, found the 33-year-old Duggar guilty on one count each of receiving and possessing child pornography. He faces up to 20 years in prison and fines of up to $250,000 for each count when he’s sentenced at a later date.

Duggar and his large Arkansas family starred on TLC’s “19 Kids and Counting” until the network canceled the show in 2015 following revelations that he had molested four of his sisters and a babysitter. Authorities began investigating the abuse in 2006 after receiving a tip from a family friend but concluded that the statute of limitations on any possible charges had expired.

Duggar’s parents said he had confessed to the fondling and apologized. Duggar later apologized for a pornography addiction and for cheating on his wife.

The judge in the child porn case ruled that jurors could hear testimony about how in 2003, Duggar admitted to molesting four girls. A family friend testified that Duggar told her about the abuse.

Federal authorities said they began investigating after a Little Rock police detective found child porn files were being shared by a computer traced to Duggar. A federal agent testified in May that images depicting the sexual abuse of children, including toddlers, were downloaded in 2019 onto a computer at a car dealership Duggar owned.

Duggar’s attorney argued that someone else downloaded or uploaded the images onto Duggar’s computer. But the jury wasn’t swayed.

Duggar’s father Jim Bob Duggar, who also starred on the reality show, is running in a special election for a vacant state Senate seat in northwestern Arkansas. He previously served in the Arkansas House.

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC.

How Nursing Homes’ Worst Offenses Are Hidden From the Public

merlin 197440290 f22bfa2f 95ad 4765 b948 b7242b2ced4a facebookJumbo

The public never found out that inspectors cited another New Jersey nursing home, Rehab at River’s Edge, for failing to protect a fragile resident who fell seven separate times, at one point fracturing her foot.

And the public never found out that a resident at the Golden Living Center nursing home in Morgantown, W.Va., crashed to the ground and died after staff mistakenly removed the safety rails from his bed.

In all three of those cases, the state inspectors’ findings were upheld by a federal judge.

Mr. Blum, the C.M.S. official, didn’t say why such citations had never appeared on Care Compare. He said the agency was working to fix the problem. (The three homes declined to comment or didn’t respond to requests for comment. Golden Living is under new management.)

Dr. David Gifford, the chief medical officer of the American Health Care Association, which represents the nursing home industry, said the group’s members believed the appeals process should be faster and more transparent. He said Medicare should not post the results of inspections that are in dispute.

On paper, Hilltop Rehabilitation, a sprawling ranch-style nursing home in Weatherford, Texas, seems like a place where little ever goes wrong. On Medicare’s rating website, the facility has won the highest scores on its health inspections for four years straight, not incurring a single serious infraction.

What’s missing from that picture, though, is what happened to Alan Hart’s mother, Laverne.

In 2014, he placed the 87-year-old retired children’s book author, who had dementia, at Hilltop because he was having trouble caring for her on his own.

Mr. Hart said it broke his heart to move her, but he thought she would be in good hands at the five-star nursing home, which planned to keep her on a supervised, locked floor.